Literature DB >> 34162430

Development of the Paranormal and Supernatural Beliefs Scale using classical and modern test theory.

Charlotte E Dean1, Shazia Akhtar2, Tim M Gale2, Karen Irvine2, Richard Wiseman2, Keith R Laws2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study describes the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring belief in paranormal phenomena. The work aims to address psychometric and conceptual shortcomings associated with existing measures of paranormal belief. The study also compares the use of classic test theory and modern test theory as methods for scale development.
METHOD: We combined novel items and amended items taken from existing scales, to produce an initial corpus of 29 items. Two hundred and thirty-one adult participants rated their level of agreement with each item using a seven-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: Classical test theory methods (including exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis) reduced the scale to 14 items and one overarching factor: Supernatural Beliefs. The factor demonstrated high internal reliability, with an excellent test-retest reliability for the total scale. Modern test theory methods (Rasch analysis using a rating scale model) reduced the scale to 13 items with a four-point response format. The Rasch scale was found to be most effective at differentiating between individuals with moderate-high levels of paranormal beliefs, and differential item functioning analysis indicated that the Rasch scale represents a valid measure of belief in paranormal phenomena.
CONCLUSIONS: The scale developed using modern test theory is identified as the final scale as this model allowed for in-depth analyses and refinement of the scale that was not possible using classical test theory. Results support the psychometric reliability of this new scale for assessing belief in paranormal phenomena, particularly when differentiating between individuals with higher levels of belief.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anomalous beliefs; Classical test theory; Factor analysis; Modern test theory; Paranormal beliefs; Rasch analysis; Rating scale model; Scale; Scale development; Supernatural

Year:  2021        PMID: 34162430     DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00600-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Psychol        ISSN: 2050-7283


  28 in total

1.  Age and sex differences in paranormal beliefs: a response to Vitulli, Tipton, and Rowe (1999)

Authors:  H J Irwin
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2000-04

2.  Rejoinder to Irwin's (2000) "age and sex differences in paranormal beliefs: a response to Vitulli, Tipton, and Rowe (1999)".

Authors:  W F Vitulli
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2000-10

3.  Objective measurement of paranormal belief: a rebuttal to Vitulli.

Authors:  R Lange; H J Irwin; J Houran
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2001-06

4.  Associative processing and paranormal belief.

Authors:  L R Gianotti; C Mohr; D Pizzagalli; D Lehmann; P Brugger
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.188

5.  The role played by ego permissiveness and imagery in hypnotic responsivity.

Authors:  M J Diamond; R Taft
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  1975-04

6.  Belief in the paranormal and suggestion in the seance room.

Authors:  Richard Wiseman; Emma Greening; Matthew Smith
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-08

Review 7.  Belief in psychic ability and the misattribution hypothesis: a qualitative review.

Authors:  Richard Wiseman; Caroline Watt
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2006-08

8.  Executive functions in morality, religion, and paranormal beliefs.

Authors:  Omar Wain; Marcello Spinella
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.292

9.  Supernatural beliefs among graduate students at the University of Pennsylvania.

Authors:  C A Salter; L M Routledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Beliefs in the paranormal: age and sex differences among elderly persons and undergraduate students.

Authors:  W F Vitulli; S M Tipton; J L Rowe
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1999-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Variations in Well-Being as a Function of Paranormal Belief and Psychopathological Symptoms: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Neil Dagnall; Andrew Denovan; Kenneth Graham Drinkwater
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Paranormal beliefs and cognitive function: A systematic review and assessment of study quality across four decades of research.

Authors:  Charlotte E Dean; Shazia Akhtar; Tim M Gale; Karen Irvine; Dominique Grohmann; Keith R Laws
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.