Literature DB >> 34162368

Exploring the use of health and wellbeing measures during pregnancy and the first year following birth in women living with pre-existing long-term conditions: qualitative interviews with women and healthcare professionals.

Laura Kelly1,2, Jennifer J Kurinczuk3, Oliver Rivero-Arias3, Ray Fitzpatrick4, Elizabeth Gibbons5, Fiona Alderdice6,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One way in which care for pregnant and postpartum women living with long-term health conditions (LTCs) may be improved is through the adoption of standardised measures to provide evidence of health outcomes and wellbeing from the woman's perspective. AIM: The study explores the views of pregnant and postpartum women living with LTCs, and healthcare professionals to better understand the potential value of using standardised health and wellbeing measures within this patient population.
METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted to explore the perceived value of using measures with pregnant and postpartum women living with LTCs within maternity services. Participants were asked to provide feedback on three exemplar measures: the Long Term Conditions Questionnaire, the Wellbeing in Pregnancy Questionnaire and the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L instrument. Thematic analysis was used in the analysis of the transcripts.
RESULTS: Eleven women and 11 healthcare professionals took part in semi-structured interviews. Analysis identified five themes as relevant to the use of measures within maternity services: 1) Improving care, 2) Assessing outcomes, 3) Interpretation and application of data, 4) Engagement challenges and implementation and, 5) Women and healthcare professionals alignment.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite varying prior experience and expressing some questions about implementation, respondents were cautiously positive about the use of standardised health and wellbeing measures. Their use offers the opportunity for both affected women and healthcare professionals caring for them to collectively identify and assess important areas of unmet needs and improve outcomes. Incorporating the perspectives of women with LTC's will help bring awareness to elements of women centred care which health services may seek to address.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic conditions; Maternity care; Patient-reported outcomes; Postpartum; Pregnancy; Qualitative interviews; Questionnaire

Year:  2021        PMID: 34162368     DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06615-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  23 in total

1.  Developing core patient-reported outcomes in maternity: PRO-Maternity.

Authors:  A Mahmud; E Morris; S Johnson; K M Ismail
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview.

Authors:  Keith A Meadows
Journal:  Br J Community Nurs       Date:  2011-03

3.  Early cognitive development in children born to women with epilepsy: a prospective report.

Authors:  Rebecca L Bromley; George Mawer; Jenna Love; James Kelly; Laura Purdy; Lauren McEwan; Maria Briggs; Jill Clayton-Smith; Xin Shi; Xin Sin; Gus A Baker
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 4.  Asthma Outcomes and Management During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Catherine A Bonham; Karen C Patterson; Mary E Strek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Disparities in Chronic Conditions Among Women Hospitalized for Delivery in the United States, 2005-2014.

Authors:  Lindsay K Admon; Tyler N A Winkelman; Michelle H Moniz; Matthew M Davis; Michele Heisler; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Women living with epilepsy, experiences of pregnancy and reproductive health: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Annalise Weckesser; Elaine Denny
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.184

8.  Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal.

Authors:  Malini Anand Nijagal; Stephanie Wissig; Caleb Stowell; Elizabeth Olson; Isis Amer-Wahlin; Gouke Bonsel; Allyson Brooks; Matthew Coleman; Shamala Devi Karalasingam; James M N Duffy; Tracy Flanagan; Stefan Gebhardt; Meridith E Greene; Floris Groenendaal; J Ravichandran R Jeganathan; Tessa Kowaliw; Marije Lamain-de-Ruiter; Elliott Main; Michelle Owens; Rod Petersen; Irwin Reiss; Carol Sakala; Anna Maria Speciale; Rachel Thompson; Oluwakemi Okunade; Arie Franx
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  "Nobody knows, or seems to know how rheumatology and breastfeeding works": Women's experiences of breastfeeding whilst managing a long-term limiting condition - A qualitative visual methods study.

Authors:  Denitza Williams; Jessica Webber; Bethan Pell; Aimee Grant; Julia Sanders; Ernest Choy; Adrian Edwards; Ann Taylor; Meng-Chieh Wu; Rhiannon Phillips
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.372

10.  PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review.

Authors:  Jonathan Field; Michelle M Holmes; Dave Newell
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2019-07-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Refinement of the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) questionnaire: cognitive interviews with women and healthcare professionals and a validation survey.

Authors:  Laura Kelly; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Ray Fitzpatrick; Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.