Danielle M Nash1,2, Zohra Bhimani3, Jennifer Rayner4,5, Merrick Zwarenstein6,4,7. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada. Danielle.nash@ices.on.ca. 2. ICES, London, ON, Canada. Danielle.nash@ices.on.ca. 3. Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada. 4. Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Research and Evaluation, Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 7. ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Learning health systems have been gaining traction over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to understand the spread of learning health systems in primary care, including where they have been implemented, how they are operating, and potential challenges and solutions. METHODS: We completed a scoping review by systematically searching OVID Medline®, Embase®, IEEE Xplore®, and reviewing specific journals from 2007 to 2020. We also completed a Google search to identify gray literature. RESULTS: We reviewed 1924 articles through our database search and 51 articles from other sources, from which we identified 21 unique learning health systems based on 62 data sources. Only one of these learning health systems was implemented exclusively in a primary care setting, where all others were integrated health systems or networks that also included other care settings. Eighteen of the 21 were in the United States. Examples of how these learning health systems were being used included real-time clinical surveillance, quality improvement initiatives, pragmatic trials at the point of care, and decision support. Many challenges and potential solutions were identified regarding data, sustainability, promoting a learning culture, prioritization processes, involvement of community, and balancing quality improvement versus research. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 21 learning health systems, which all appear at an early stage of development, and only one was primary care only. We summarized and provided examples of integrated health systems and data networks that can be considered early models in the growing global movement to advance learning health systems in primary care.
BACKGROUND: Learning health systems have been gaining traction over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to understand the spread of learning health systems in primary care, including where they have been implemented, how they are operating, and potential challenges and solutions. METHODS: We completed a scoping review by systematically searching OVID Medline®, Embase®, IEEE Xplore®, and reviewing specific journals from 2007 to 2020. We also completed a Google search to identify gray literature. RESULTS: We reviewed 1924 articles through our database search and 51 articles from other sources, from which we identified 21 unique learning health systems based on 62 data sources. Only one of these learning health systems was implemented exclusively in a primary care setting, where all others were integrated health systems or networks that also included other care settings. Eighteen of the 21 were in the United States. Examples of how these learning health systems were being used included real-time clinical surveillance, quality improvement initiatives, pragmatic trials at the point of care, and decision support. Many challenges and potential solutions were identified regarding data, sustainability, promoting a learning culture, prioritization processes, involvement of community, and balancing quality improvement versus research. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 21 learning health systems, which all appear at an early stage of development, and only one was primary care only. We summarized and provided examples of integrated health systems and data networks that can be considered early models in the growing global movement to advance learning health systems in primary care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Family medicine; Health systems improvement; Health systems research; Healthcare delivery; Learning health systems; Primary care; Quality of care; Scoping review; Systematic review
Authors: Dave Davis; Mike Evans; Alex Jadad; Laure Perrier; Darlyne Rath; David Ryan; Gary Sibbald; Sharon Straus; Susan Rappolt; Maria Wowk; Merrick Zwarenstein Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-07-05
Authors: Richard W Grant; Connie S Uratsu; Karen R Estacio; Andrea Altschuler; Eileen Kim; Bruce Fireman; Alyce S Adams; Julie A Schmittdiel; Michele Heisler Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Shayna L Henry; Yasmina Mohan; Joel L Whittaker; Marguerite A Koster; Joanne E Schottinger; Michael H Kanter Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.983