Zeinab Aryanian1, Kamran Balighi2, Maryam Daneshpazhooh2, Emad Karamshahi3, Parvaneh Hatami4, Azadeh Goodarzi5, Mahroo Tajalli6, Terrence M Vance7. 1. Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1199663911, Iran; Department of Dermatology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol 47176_47745, Iran. 2. Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1199663911, Iran; Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1199663911, Iran. 3. Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1199663911, Iran. 4. Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1199663911, Iran. Electronic address: p-hatami@alumnus.tums.ac.ir. 5. Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1445613131, Iran. 6. Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is an autoimmune disease that is challenging to treat and has few available therapeutic options. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that rituximab may be an efficacious first-line treatment in newest guidelines. AIM: To compare the side effect profiles of rituximab administered after a course of immunosuppressant agents versus as a first-line therapy and evaluate the impact of patient characteristics and disease severity indices on occurrence of adverse effects. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 999 patients with pemphigus vulgaris who received rituximab either as a first-line treatment or after conventional adjuvant therapies. The occurrence of partial or complete remission as well as the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Smoking, pulmonary comorbidity, and mucocutaneous phenotype were associated with an increased risk of developing infectious complications by 12.49, 5.79, and 2.37 fold, respectively. These associations were more prominent among those who received rituximab after immunosuppressant agents. CONCLUSIONS: Early use of rituximab benefits pemphigus patients, especially those with a mucocutaneous phenotype, pulmonary comorbidity, or history of smoking, and reduces their risk of infectious adverse events.
BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is an autoimmune disease that is challenging to treat and has few available therapeutic options. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that rituximab may be an efficacious first-line treatment in newest guidelines. AIM: To compare the side effect profiles of rituximab administered after a course of immunosuppressant agents versus as a first-line therapy and evaluate the impact of patient characteristics and disease severity indices on occurrence of adverse effects. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 999 patients with pemphigus vulgaris who received rituximab either as a first-line treatment or after conventional adjuvant therapies. The occurrence of partial or complete remission as well as the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Smoking, pulmonary comorbidity, and mucocutaneous phenotype were associated with an increased risk of developing infectious complications by 12.49, 5.79, and 2.37 fold, respectively. These associations were more prominent among those who received rituximab after immunosuppressant agents. CONCLUSIONS: Early use of rituximab benefits pemphigus patients, especially those with a mucocutaneous phenotype, pulmonary comorbidity, or history of smoking, and reduces their risk of infectious adverse events.