Literature DB >> 34161930

Overview of epidemiological studies of nuclear workers: opportunities, expectations, and limitations.

Richard Wakeford1.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies of those exposed occupationally to ionising radiation offer an important opportunity to directly check the assumptions underlying the international system of radiological protection against low-level radiation exposures. Recent nuclear worker studies, notably the International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS) and studies of the Mayak workforce in Russia, provide powerful investigations of a wide range of cumulative photon doses received at a low dose-rate over protracted periods, and broadly confirm radiation-related excess risks of leukaemia and solid cancers at around the levels predicted by standard risk models derived mainly from the experience of the Japanese atomic-bomb survivors acutely exposed principally to gamma radiation. However, the slope of the dose-response for solid cancers expressed in terms of the excess relative risk per unit dose, ERR/Gy, differs between INWORKS and Mayak, such that when compared with the slope derived from the atomic-bomb survivors, INWORKS does not provide obvious support for the use in radiological protection of a dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor greater than one whereas the Mayak workforce apparently does. This difference could be a chance effect, but it could also point to potential problems with these worker studies. Of particular concern is the adequacy of recorded doses received in the early years of operations at older nuclear installations, such as the potential for 'missed' photon doses. A further issue is how baseline cancer rates may influence radiation-related excess risks. There is scope for a considerable increase in the statistical power of worker studies, with longer follow-up capturing more deaths and incident cases of cancer, and further workforces being included in collaborative studies, but the difficulties posed by dosimetry questions should not be ignored and need to be the subject of detailed scrutiny. Creative Commons Attribution license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer risk; dose uncertainties; low-level radiation exposure; nuclear workers

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34161930     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac0df4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  1 in total

1.  Exaggerated Risk Perception of Low-Dose Radiation: Motives and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Sergei Jargin
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.