Literature DB >> 34161281

Proteasomal conformation controls unfolding ability.

Julianna R Cresti1, Abramo J Manfredonia1, Christopher E Bragança1, Joseph A Boscia1, Christina M Hurley1, Mary D Cundiff1, Daniel A Kraut2.   

Abstract

The 26S proteasome is the macromolecular machine responsible for the bulk of protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. As it degrades a ubiquitinated protein, the proteasome transitions from a substrate-accepting conformation (s1) to a set of substrate-processing conformations (s3 like), each stabilized by different intramolecular contacts. Tools to study these conformational changes remain limited, and although several interactions have been proposed to be important for stabilizing the proteasome's various conformations, it has been difficult to test these directly under equilibrium conditions. Here, we describe a conformationally sensitive Förster resonance energy transfer assay, in which fluorescent proteins are fused to Sem1 and Rpn6, which are nearer each other in substrate-processing conformations than in the substrate-accepting conformation. Using this assay, we find that two sets of interactions, one involving Rpn5 and another involving Rpn2, are both important for stabilizing substrate-processing conformations. Mutations that disrupt these interactions both destabilize substrate-processing conformations relative to the substrate-accepting conformation and diminish the proteasome's ability to successfully unfold and degrade hard-to-unfold substrates, providing a link between the proteasome's conformational state and its unfolding ability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP-dependent protease; ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA); proteasome; protein degradation; protein unfolding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34161281      PMCID: PMC8237680          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101004118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

Review 1.  Recognition of Client Proteins by the Proteasome.

Authors:  Houqing Yu; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 12.981

2.  Specific lid-base contacts in the 26s proteasome control the conformational switching required for substrate degradation.

Authors:  Eric R Greene; Ellen A Goodall; Andres H de la Peña; Mary E Matyskiela; Gabriel C Lander; Andreas Martin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Mode of targeting to the proteasome determines GFP fate.

Authors:  Christopher Eric Bragança; Daniel Adam Kraut
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Sequence- and species-dependence of proteasomal processivity.

Authors:  Daniel A Kraut; Eitan Israeli; Erin K Schrader; Ashwini Patil; Kenta Nakai; Dhaval Nanavati; Tomonao Inobe; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  Structural Snapshots of 26S Proteasome Reveal Tetraubiquitin-Induced Conformations.

Authors:  Zhanyu Ding; Cong Xu; Indrajit Sahu; Yifan Wang; Zhenglin Fu; Min Huang; Catherine C L Wong; Michael H Glickman; Yao Cong
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Characterization of a spectrally diverse set of fluorescent proteins as FRET acceptors for mTurquoise2.

Authors:  Marieke Mastop; Daphne S Bindels; Nathan C Shaner; Marten Postma; Theodorus W J Gadella; Joachim Goedhart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  New vectors for simple and streamlined CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Marian F Laughery; Tierra Hunter; Alexander Brown; James Hoopes; Travis Ostbye; Taven Shumaker; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.239

8.  Recombinant Expression, Unnatural Amino Acid Incorporation, and Site-Specific Labeling of 26S Proteasomal Subcomplexes.

Authors:  Jared A M Bard; Andreas Martin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

9.  Expanded Coverage of the 26S Proteasome Conformational Landscape Reveals Mechanisms of Peptidase Gating.

Authors:  Markus R Eisele; Randi G Reed; Till Rudack; Andreas Schweitzer; Florian Beck; Istvan Nagy; Günter Pfeifer; Jürgen M Plitzko; Wolfgang Baumeister; Robert J Tomko; Eri Sakata
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  An Allosteric Interaction Network Promotes Conformation State-Dependent Eviction of the Nas6 Assembly Chaperone from Nascent 26S Proteasomes.

Authors:  Antonia A Nemec; Anna K Peterson; Jennifer L Warnock; Randi G Reed; Robert J Tomko
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 9.423

View more
  2 in total

1.  The 26S Proteasome Switches between ATP-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms in Response to Substrate Ubiquitination.

Authors:  Abramo J Manfredonia; Daniel A Kraut
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  The RPN12a proteasome subunit is essential for the multiple hormonal homeostasis controlling the progression of leaf senescence.

Authors:  Clément Boussardon; Pushan Bag; Marta Juvany; Jan Šimura; Karin Ljung; Stefan Jansson; Olivier Keech
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.