| Literature DB >> 34161278 |
Shengqing Gu1,2, Stephanie Lheureux1,3, Azin Sayad1, Paulina Cybulska1,4, Liat Hogen1,4, Iryna Vyarvelska1,4, Dongsheng Tu5, Wendy R Parulekar5, Matthew Nankivell6, Sean Kehoe7, Dennis S Chi8,9, Douglas A Levine10, Marcus Q Bernardini1,4, Barry Rosen1,4, Amit Oza1,3, Myles Brown11,12, Benjamin G Neel13,2.
Abstract
High-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) is a major cause of cancer-related death. Treatment is not uniform, with some patients undergoing primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS) and others being treated directly with chemotherapy and only having surgery after three to four cycles (NACT). Which strategy is optimal remains controversial. We developed a mathematical framework that simulates hierarchical or stochastic models of tumor initiation and reproduces the clinical course of HGSC. After estimating parameter values, we infer that most patients harbor chemoresistant HGSC cells at diagnosis and that, if the tumor burden is not too large and complete debulking can be achieved, PDS is superior to NACT due to better depletion of resistant cells. We further predict that earlier diagnosis of primary HGSC, followed by complete debulking, could improve survival, but its benefit in relapsed patients is likely to be limited. These predictions are supported by primary clinical data from multiple cohorts. Our results have clear implications for these key issues in HGSC management.Entities:
Keywords: computational model; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ovarian cancer; primary debunking surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34161278 PMCID: PMC8237655 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026663118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205