Literature DB >> 34160622

Cost, reach, and representativeness of recruitment efforts for an online skin cancer risk reduction intervention trial for young adults.

Carolyn J Heckman1, Mary Riley1, Olga Khavjou2, Pamela Ohman-Strickland1, Sharon L Manne1, Amy L Yaroch3, Trishnee Bhurosy1, Elliot J Coups4, Karen Glanz5.   

Abstract

Despite its increasing use, few studies have reported on demographic representativeness and costs of research recruitment via social media. It was hypothesized that cost, reach, enrollment, and demographic representativeness would differ by social media recruitment approach. Participants were 18-25 year-olds at moderate to high risk of skin cancer based on phenotypic and behavioral characteristics. Paid Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter ads, unpaid social media posts by study staff, and unpaid referrals were used to recruit participants. Demographic and other characteristics of the sample were compared with the 2015 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) sample. Analyses demonstrated significant differences among recruitment approaches regarding cost efficiency, study participation, and representativeness. Costs were compared across 4,274 individuals who completed eligibility screeners over a 7-month period from: Instagram, 44.6% (of the sample) = 1,907, $9 (per individual screened); Facebook, 31.5% = 1,345, $8; Twitter, 1% = 42, $178; unpaid posts by study staff, 10.6% and referred, 6.5%, $1. The lowest rates of study enrollment among individuals screened was for Twitter. Most demographic and skin cancer risk factors of study participants differed from those of the 2015 NHIS sample and across social media recruitment approaches. Considering recruitment costs and number of participants enrolled, Facebook and Instagram appeared to be the most useful approaches for recruiting 18-25 year-olds. Findings suggest that project budget, target population and representativeness, and participation goals should inform selection and/or combination of existing and emerging online recruitment approaches. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Recruitment; Skin cancer prevention; Social media

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34160622      PMCID: PMC8541696          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.626


  29 in total

1.  Identifying careless responses in survey data.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; S Bartholomew Craig
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-04-16

Review 2.  Perspectives on social media in and as research: A synthetic review.

Authors:  Natalie T Lafferty; Annalisa Manca
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-05

3.  Clinical Trial Recruitment and Retention of College Students with Type 1 Diabetes via Social Media: An Implementation Case Study.

Authors:  Lauren E Wisk; Eliza B Nelson; Kara M Magane; Elissa R Weitzman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-22

4.  Development and reliability of a brief skin cancer risk assessment tool.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Elinor Schoenfeld; Martin A Weinstock; Gabriela Layi; Jeanne Kidd; Dorothy M Shigaki
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2003

5.  Using social media for smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Luo; M S Li; D Williams; S Phillippi; Q Yu; S Kantrow; Y H Kao; M Celestin; W T Lin; T S Tseng
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2020-02-20

Review 6.  The Use of Social Media for Health Promotion in Hispanic Populations: A Scoping Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julia Hudnut-Beumler; Eli Po'e; Shari Barkin
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-07-11

7.  Recruiting Hard-to-Reach Populations for Survey Research: Using Facebook and Instagram Advertisements and In-Person Intercept in LGBT Bars and Nightclubs to Recruit LGBT Young Adults.

Authors:  Jamie Guillory; Kristine F Wiant; Matthew Farrelly; Leah Fiacco; Ishrat Alam; Leah Hoffman; Erik Crankshaw; Janine Delahanty; Tesfa N Alexander
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  The potential use of social media and other internet-related data and communications for child maltreatment surveillance and epidemiological research: Scoping review and recommendations.

Authors:  Laura M Schwab-Reese; Wendy Hovdestad; Lil Tonmyr; John Fluke
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2018-02-01

9.  Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas J Hulbert-Williams; Rosina Pendrous; Lee Hulbert-Williams; Brooke Swash
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-12-12

Review 10.  The Use of Facebook in Recruiting Participants for Health Research Purposes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher Whitaker; Sharon Stevelink; Nicola Fear
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.