Kartik Anand1, Polly Niravath1, Tejal Patel1, Joe Ensor2, Angel Rodriguez1, Toniva Boone1, Stephen T Wong3, Jenny C Chang4. 1. Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 2. Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX. 3. Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX. 4. Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX. Electronic address: jcchang@houstonmethodist.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy eliminates most of the cancer cells except those with potential for self-renewal and tumor initiation, called cancer stem cells (CSCs). Chloroquine, through bioinformatics, was found to be a potential agent to target CSCs. We designed a phase II trial to test the efficacy and safety of chloroquine in combination with taxane or taxane-like chemotherapy agents in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer who are refractory to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients ≥ 18 years of age who had received prior anthracycline chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Chloroquine 250 mg was given daily orally with either docetaxel or paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone every 3 weeks. The maximum number of 3-week cycles allowed was 6. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, and 31 patients were evaluated for response. The median age was 54.1 years (range, 31.7-78.1 years). The ORR was 45.16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2%-62.2%), which was higher than the expected ORR of 30% (P = .03). Patients were followed for a median of 25.4 months and experienced a median PFS of 12.4 months (95% CI, 4.9-24.6 months) and a median OS of 25.4 months (95% CI, 13.7-83.5 months). The combination was well-tolerated, with only 13.15% of patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: A combination of chloroquine with taxane or taxane-like chemotherapy was efficacious in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy eliminates most of the cancer cells except those with potential for self-renewal and tumor initiation, called cancer stem cells (CSCs). Chloroquine, through bioinformatics, was found to be a potential agent to target CSCs. We designed a phase II trial to test the efficacy and safety of chloroquine in combination with taxane or taxane-like chemotherapy agents in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer who are refractory to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients ≥ 18 years of age who had received prior anthracycline chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Chloroquine 250 mg was given daily orally with either docetaxel or paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone every 3 weeks. The maximum number of 3-week cycles allowed was 6. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, and 31 patients were evaluated for response. The median age was 54.1 years (range, 31.7-78.1 years). The ORR was 45.16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2%-62.2%), which was higher than the expected ORR of 30% (P = .03). Patients were followed for a median of 25.4 months and experienced a median PFS of 12.4 months (95% CI, 4.9-24.6 months) and a median OS of 25.4 months (95% CI, 13.7-83.5 months). The combination was well-tolerated, with only 13.15% of patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: A combination of chloroquine with taxane or taxane-like chemotherapy was efficacious in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Authors: F Y Lee; R Borzilleri; C R Fairchild; S H Kim; B H Long; C Reventos-Suarez; G D Vite; W C Rose; R A Kramer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S E Jones; J Erban; B Overmoyer; G T Budd; L Hutchins; E Lower; L Laufman; S Sundaram; W J Urba; K I Pritchard; R Mennel; D Richards; S Olsen; M L Meyers; P M Ravdin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Katherine L Cook; Anni Wärri; David R Soto-Pantoja; Pamela Ag Clarke; M Idalia Cruz; Alan Zwart; Robert Clarke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J M Nabholtz; H J Senn; W R Bezwoda; D Melnychuk; L Deschênes; J Douma; T A Vandenberg; B Rapoport; R Rosso; V Trillet-Lenoir; J Drbal; A Molino; J W Nortier; D J Richel; T Nagykalnai; P Siedlecki; N Wilking; J Y Genot; P S Hupperets; F Pannuti; D Skarlos; E M Tomiak; M Murawsky; M Alakl; M Aapro Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael F Marmor; Ulrich Kellner; Timothy Y Y Lai; Jonathan S Lyons; William F Mieler Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Dong Soon Choi; Elvin Blanco; Yoo-Shin Kim; Angel A Rodriguez; Hong Zhao; Tim Hui-Ming Huang; Chun-Liang Chen; Guangxu Jin; Melissa D Landis; Lacey A Burey; Wei Qian; Sergio M Granados; Bhuvanesh Dave; Helen H Wong; Mauro Ferrari; Stephen T C Wong; Jenny C Chang Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Diana H Liang; Dong Soon Choi; Joe E Ensor; Benny A Kaipparettu; Barbara L Bass; Jenny C Chang Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 8.679