| Literature DB >> 34159303 |
Guanxiong Yan, Wentao Yang, Xiaojie Han, Kai Chen, Jie Xiong, Eileen P Hamilton, Eduardo Orias, Wei Miao.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101950.].Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34159303 PMCID: PMC8193607 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Table 1. Mating type systems of Tetrahymena species investigated in this article
| Clade∗ | Subcladea | Species | # Mating types | MTD patternb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borealis | “The-Mal” | 7 | Karyonidal | |
| Borealis | “The-Mal” | 6 | Karyonidal | |
| Borealis | “Pyr-Vor” | asexual | N/A | |
| Borealis | “Pyr-Vor” | asexual | N/A | |
| Borealis | “Bor-Can” | 7 | Karyonidal | |
| Borealis | “Bor-Can” | 5 | Karyonidal | |
| Australis | “Pig-Ame” | perpetual selfer | N/A | |
| Australis | “Pig-Ame” | 3 | Synclonal | |
| Australis | “Pig-Ame” | 9 | Synclonal | |
| Paravorax | N/A | N/D | N/D |
N/D: not determined.
aThe phylogeny is illustrated in Figure 2B.
bMating type determination pattern observed in sexual progeny (see text and Figure S1 for explanation). N/A: not applicable; only strain and only species characterized in this clade.