David Collister1,2, Nathalie Saad3, Emily Christie4, Sofia Ahmed5,6. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. 2. Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada. 6. Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
We thank Jue et al for their comments regarding the assessment of renal function in
transgender patients with kidney disease. We agree that any evaluation should include
consideration of a patient’s anatomy, medical history, medications, and laboratory values. We
also agree that the measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) by either 24-hour urine for
creatinine clearance or an alternative method is necessary if an accurate and precise measure
of GFR is needed for clinical decision-making. However, mGFR has its own limitations and may
not be feasible to be assessed or repeated at all clinical encounters. Similarly, 24-hour
urine collections are often inaccurate even in tertiary care settings.
Thus, we recommended using the range of estimated GFR (eGFR) using both sex at birth
and current gender identity for all transgender patients, including those treated with
long-term gender affirmation hormone therapy (GAHT). Ideally, this value could be confirmed by
mGFR with eGFR used longitudinally. These ranges must be taken with consideration of the
patient’s estimated muscle mass, which may be evolving over time with the use of GAHT and
other interventions.We understand their concerns about extrapolating data from small case series and cohort
studies with heterogeneous populations and interventions. Our review only included 9 studies,
whereas that of Webb et al
included only 4 studies, 2 of which are cited in our review. However, their review also
highlights other pharmacokinetic differences between sexes and genders including absorption,
volume of distribution, protein binding, and hepatic metabolism which are relevant to
transgender persons and their clinicians. There is clearly a need for large population-based
cohort studies and a systematic review addressing the assessment of kidney function and the
impact of GAHT on kidney function in transgender persons.
Finally, the development and validation of eGFR equations,[4,5] specific to transgender persons, should be a research priority, but this
will require collaboration across institutions given at present, the relative rarity of the
intersection of transgender persons, and chronic kidney disease.
Authors: Andrew J Webb; Dayna McManus; Ginger E Rouse; Robyn Vonderheyde; Jeffrey E Topal Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Carter Boyd; Kyle Wood; Dustin Whitaker; Omotola Ashorobi; Lisa Harvey; Robert Oster; Ross P Holmes; Dean G Assimos Journal: Rev Urol Date: 2018
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Lesley A Stevens; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Stephen Hendriksen; John W Kusek; Frederick Van Lente Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391