Literature DB >> 3415889

No effect of continuous i.p. infusion of bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia, pulmonary function and the stress response to surgery.

N B Scott1, T Mogensen, A Greulich, N C Hjortsø, H Kehlet.   

Abstract

In a double-blind prospective study, 20 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were allocated randomly to receive a continuous 8-h i.p. infusion of either physiological saline or 0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml h-1 (in saline) following a loading dose of saline 1 ml kg-1 or 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml kg-1 on entering the peritoneum. The following variables were measured before and at 2-h intervals during the infusion: serum glucose and cortisol concentrations, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in the first second, peak expiratory flow rate and pain at rest, on mobilization and on coughing (visual analogue scale). Postoperative pain, impairment in pulmonary function and increase in serum cortisol and glucose concentrations were not influenced by the i.p. infusion of bupivacaine when compared with saline. This study shows that the i.p. instillation of therapeutically safe doses of bupivacaine was without effect in the management of pain, postoperative pulmonary dysfunction and the stress response in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3415889     DOI: 10.1093/bja/61.2.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  7 in total

1.  The use of bupivacaine to relieve pain at iliac graft donor sites.

Authors:  B D Todd; S C Reed
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Postoperative pain control using continuous i.m. bupivacaine infusion plus patient-controlled analgesia compared with epidural analgesia after major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Edgar M Wong-Lun-Hing; Ronald M van Dam; Fenella K S Welsh; John K G Wells; Timothy G John; Adrian B Cresswell; Cornelis H C Dejong; Myrddin Rees
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  An alternative method of wound pain control following hepatic resection: a preliminary study.

Authors:  S Basu; A Tamijmarane; D Bulters; J K G Wells; T G John; M Rees
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  [Wound perfusion with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after elective abdominal surgery.].

Authors:  A Tiemann; A Bettermann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Medial open transversus abdominis plane (MOTAP) catheters for analgesia following open liver resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul Karanicolas; Sean Cleary; Paul McHardy; Stuart McCluskey; Jason Sawyer; Salima Ladak; Calvin Law; Alice Wei; Natalie Coburn; Raynauld Ko; Joel Katz; Alex Kiss; James Khan; Srinivas Coimbatore; Jenny Lam-McCulloch; Hance Clarke
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Evaluation of analgesic effect of two different doses of fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine for surgical site infiltration in cases of modified radical mastoidectomy: A double blind randomized study.

Authors:  Geeta Bhandari; Kedar Singh Shahi; Nitish Kumar Parmar; Mohammad Asad; Hemchandra Kumar Joshi; Rajni Bhakuni
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 May-Aug

7.  Dexmedetomidine in a surgically inserted catheter for transversus abdominis plane block in donor hepatectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Mohamed Adel Aboelela; Al-Refaey Kandeel; Usama Elsayed; Mohamed Elmorshedi; Waleed Elsarraf; Eman Elsayed; Ahmed Elgawalby; Ahmed Mohamed Sultan; Mohamed Abdel Wahab; Amr Yassen
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.