| Literature DB >> 34158808 |
Sumaira Thind1, Iqbal Hussain1, Shafaqat Ali2,3, Rizwan Rasheed1, Muhammad Arslan Ashraf1.
Abstract
Silicon (Si) application enhanced the tolerance of plants against different environmental stresses. Therefore, objective of the study revealed that foliar applied Si alleviates the adverse effect of Cd by enhancing the growth, metabolite accumulation, strengthening the antioxidant defense system, reducing oxidative injury, improving plant nutrient status, and decreasing the Cd uptake in wheat. The surface sterilized seeds of Sahar-2006 (tolerant) and Inqalab-91 (sensitive) having the differential metal tolerance capacity were sown in plastic pots containing normal and Cd spiked sandy loamy soil. The design of experiments was completely randomized with 3 replicates per treatment. Two weeks after germination, plants were sprayed with different concentrations of Si (1.5 and 3 mM) with 0.1% surfactant in the form of Tween-20. The plants were harvested after 2 weeks of Si application to determine various attributes. High concentration of Cd (25 mg kg-1) decreased growth-related-attributes, essential nutrient uptake and increase the levels of oxidative stress indicators. The application of Si increased the growth-related attributes, photosynthetic pigments, essential nutrient uptake and also enhanced the activities of various antioxidant compounds (superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT) by decreasing the contents of oxidative stress indicators and Cd uptake in root and shoot of both wheat cultivars. Sahar-2006 cultivar showed more tolerance to Cd regimes than that of Inqalab-91 as clear from greater plant dry masses. Thus, our results showed that the applied Si level (3 mM) is an efficient strategy for field use in the areas, where slightly Cd polluted soils limit the agriculture production.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant compounds; cadmium; nutrient uptake; oxidative stress; silicon; wheat
Year: 2021 PMID: 34158808 PMCID: PMC8182634 DOI: 10.1177/15593258211014646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dose Response ISSN: 1559-3258 Impact factor: 2.658
Mean Values of Physico-Chemical Properties of Dry Loamy Soil.
| Soil characteristics | Values | Soil characteristics | Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil texture | Clay loam | Carbonate (meq L-1) | Nil |
| Saturation percentage (%) | 34.1 | Bicarbonate (meq L-1) | 4.0 |
| ECe (dS m-1) | 6.7 | Total nitrates (mg kg-1) | 10.5 |
| pH | 7.7 | Total nitrogen (mg kg-1) | 14.5 |
| Organic matter (%) | 0.4-0.6 | Phosphates | 8.1-10.7 |
| Calcium (meq L-1) | 3.53 | Potassium (mg kg-1) | 108-204 |
| Magnesium (meq L-1) | 5.67 |
Mean Sum of Squares From ANOVA of Data for Growth and Physio-Chemical Attributes of Wheat Cultivars Treated With Si Under Cadmium Stress.
| Source of Variance | Cultivars (CV), df = 1 | Cadmium (Cd), df = 2 | Silicon (Si), df = 2 | CV × Cd, df = 2 | CV × Si, df = 2 | Cd × Si, df = 4 | CV × Cd × Si, df = 4 | Error, df = 36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root length | 62.875*** | 36.622*** | 3.922*** | 0.430*** | 0.281*** | 0.081** | 0.159*** | 0.0299 |
| Shoot length | 49.832*** | 110.262*** | 2.399*** | 0.223* | 0.120ns | 0.032ns | 0.042ns | 0.068 |
| Shoot fresh weight | 18.963*** | 31.062*** | 2.657*** | 0.054ns | 0.146ns | 0.113ns | 0.038ns | 0.0622 |
| Shoot dry weight | 1.356*** | 1.439*** | 0.128*** | 0.005* | 0.009** | 0.004* | 0.0007ns | 0.00165 |
| Root fresh weight | 3.190*** | 4.461*** | 0.481*** | 0.040** | 0.004ns | 0.018ns | 0.003ns | 0.00895 |
| Root dry weight | 0.199*** | 0.355*** | 0.038*** | 0.0001ns | 0.007** | 0.0002ns | 0.00004ns | 0.00140 |
| Chlorophyll | 0.6350*** | 1.0485*** | 0.0288*** | 0.0091** | 0.00008ns | 0.00068ns | 0.00042ns | 0.00113 |
| Chlorophyll | 0.9180*** | 0.6608*** | 0.0233*** | 0.01701*** | 0.00057ns | 0.00064ns | 0.00019ns | 0.00113 |
| Total chlorophyll | 3.0816*** | 3.3665*** | 0.1036*** | 0.0472*** | 0.00103ns | 0.00224ns | 0.00030ns | 0.00127 |
| Total carotenoid | 0.0126*** | 0.0089*** | 2.72 × 10-4*** | 1.73 × 10-5ns | 4.31 × 10-6ns | 3.78 × 10-6ns | 3.37 × 10-6ns | 8.56 × 10-6 |
| Hydrogen peroxide | 245.08*** | 95.595*** | 10.050*** | 5.845*** | 1.635*** | 0.398** | 0.111ns | 0.128 |
| Malondialdehyde | 41.724*** | 21.929*** | 0.849*** | 1.273*** | 0.1599*** | 0.042** | 0.0325ns | 0.0237 |
| Electrolyte leakage | 3855.18** | 2681.42*** | 197.67*** | 145.23*** | 9.62* | 1.16ns | 3.12ns | 3.28 |
| TSP | 6.738*** | 3.362*** | 0.357*** | 0.085*** | 0.0103ns | 0.0032ns | 0.00146ns | 0.00490 |
| Anthocyanin | 1.689*** | 2.325*** | 0.268*** | 0.014** | 0.013** | 0.006* | 0.004ns | 0.00277 |
| SOD | 484.69*** | 322.47*** | 119.47*** | 2.135ns | 0.294ns | 3.999* | 0.389ns | 1.513 |
| POD | 5162.5*** | 5271.11*** | 1498.09*** | 25.66ns | 15.16ns | 8.39ns | 10.45ns | 33.25 |
| CAT | 121793*** | 37923*** | 9378*** | 892*** | 37ns | 81ns | 19ns | 79 |
| APX | 43896*** | 25669.7*** | 6910.3*** | 404.8*** | 54.5ns | 41.3ns | 89.8* | 39.1 |
| Root Fe2+ | 42629*** | 31543.5*** | 6487.1*** | 478.9*** | 1875.6*** | 34.6ns | 20.8ns | 56.9 |
| Shoot Fe2+ | 20193*** | 11275.2*** | 2066.2*** | 67.2ns | 46.8ns | 41.6ns | 5.8ns | 33.7 |
| Root Zn2+ | 12138** | 2681*** | 333.1*** | 232.2*** | 9.6ns | 2.5ns | 14ns | 12.6 |
| Shoot Zn2+ | 1262.4*** | 497.31*** | 34.30*** | 14.64*** | 0.20ns | 0.37ns | 0.17ns | 0.88 |
| Root Mg2+ | 116361*** | 25978*** | 5828*** | 770*** | 10ns | 154** | 125** | 39 |
| Shoot Mg2+ | 51746*** | 25126.2*** | 3317.7*** | 109.4** | 131.6** | 49.7ns | 10.0ns | 27.6 |
| Root Cd2+ | 12.033*** | 152.368*** | 11.655*** | 2.317*** | 0.034ns | 2.150*** | 0.034ns | 0.048 |
| Shoot Cd2+ | 2.8921*** | 17.764*** | 1.1299*** | 0.591*** | 0.036*** | 0.1734*** | 0.0218*** | 0.0050 |
| Root Si | 0.6828*** | 0.9447*** | 0.7219*** | 0.0788*** | 0.0155*** | 0.0417*** | 0.0047** | 0.00146 |
| Shoot Si | 0.2790*** | 0.2440*** | 0.0221*** | 0.0085*** | 0.0032*** | 0.0004ns | 0.0005ns | 0.00051 |
Abbreviations: TSP, total soluble protein; SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; Fe2+, iron ion; Zn2+, zinc ion; Mg2+, magnesium ion; Cd2+, cadmium; Si, silicon.
***, **, * = significant at 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05 levels, respectively.
Effect of Si Spray on Growth Attributes of 2 Wheat Cultivars Under Cd Regimes.
| Cultivars | Cd Stress (mg/kg) | Silicon (Si) (mM) | Root length (cm) | Shoot length (cm) | Root fresh weight (g) | Root dry weight (g) | Shoot fresh weight (g) | Shoot dry weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sahar-2006 | 0 | 0 | 7.2c ± 0.057 | 10.00c ± 0.100 | 2.03cd ± 0.09 | 0.54c ± 0.031 | 5.66cd ± 0.24 | 1.171cd ± 0.004 |
| 1.5 | 7.63b ± 0.066 | 10.60b ± 0.06 | 2.20b ± 0.057 | 0.61b ± 0.032 | 6.33b ± 0.20 | 1.30b ± 0.028 | ||
| 3.0 | 8.23a ± 0.033 | 11.23a ± 0.145 | 2.50a ± 0.115 | 0.68a ± 0.016 | 7.00a ± 0.252 | 1.45a ± 0.029 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 5.84f ± 0.024 | 7.66h ± 0.088 | 1.73fg ± 0.03 | 0.40ef ± 0.04 | 5.00ef ± 0.12 | 1.02g ± 0.044 | |
| 1.5 | 6.27e ± 0.126 | 7.97gh ± 0.120 | 1.93de ± 0.03 | 0.47d ± 0.006 | 5.47cd ± 0.12 | 1.13de ± 0.044 | ||
| 3.0 | 6.75d ± 0.083 | 8.33fg ± 0.328 | 2.12bc ± 0.07 | 0.54c ± 0.022 | 5.85c ± 0.08 | 1.23bc ± 0.033 | ||
| 25 | 0 | 3.69k ± 0.078 | 5.53k ± 0.152 | 1.26j ± 0.025 | 0.26hi ± 0.04 | 3.44k ± 0.25 | 0.70kl ± 0.015 | |
| 1.5 | 4.63h ± 0.328 | 5.84jk ± 0.217 | 1.31ij ± 0.02 | 0.33g ± 0.005 | 3.70jk ± 0.199 | 0.77jk ± 0.026 | ||
| 3.0 | 5.30g ± 0.058 | 6.28i ± 0.217 | 1.47hi ± 0.02 | 0.38fg ± 0.005 | 4.08ij ± 0.06 | 0.84i ± 0.034 | ||
| Inqalab-91 | 0 | 0 | 4.57h ± 0.053 | 8.58ef ± 0.251 | 1.69fg ± 0.06 | 0.46de ± 0.03 | 4.83fg ± 0.04 | 0.94h ± 0.012 |
| 1.5 | 5.34g ± 0.062 | 8.93de ± 0.123 | 1.83ef ± 0.06 | 0.49cd ± 0.004 | 5.33de ± 0.03 | 1.05fg ± 0.005 | ||
| 3.0 | 5.67f ± 0.070 | 9.13d ± 0.017 | 2.06bcd ± 0.05 | 0.51cd ± 0.031 | 5.50cd ± 0.06 | 1.09ef ± 0.005 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 3.98jk ± 0.044 | 5.82jk ± 0.197 | 1.29j ± 0.035 | 0.32gh ± 0.017 | 3.71jk ± 0.056 | 0.71kl ± 0.012 | |
| 1.5 | 4.179ij ± 0.05 | 6.13ij ± 0.007 | 1.37ij ± 0.07 | 0.35fg ± 0.007 | 4.16hi ± 0.05 | 0.80ij ± 0.005 | ||
| 3.0 | 4.41hi ± 0.036 | 6.39i ± 0.034 | 1.59gh ± 0.03 | 0.38fg ± 0.009 | 4.50gh ± 0.05 | 0.85ij ± 0.004 | ||
| 25 | 0 | 2.43m ± 0.048 | 3.37m ± 0.070 | 0.69l ± 0.043 | 0.19j ± 0.005 | 2.46l ± 0.231 | 0.40n ± 0.022 | |
| 1.5 | 2.59m ± 0.084 | 3.80lm ± 0.026 | 0.77kl ± 0.020 | 0.21ij ± 0.010 | 2.59l ± 0.036 | 0.44mn ± 0.015 | ||
| 3.0 | 2.95l ± 0.055 | 3.99l ± 0.026 | 0.89k ± 0.016 | 0.23ij ± 0.009 | 2.77l ± 0.063 | 0.48m ± 0.007 |
Means are followed by standard errors. Three-way ANOVA was performed and different mean values (control and treatment values) were tested by least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05 and different letters following means within the same column indicate the significant differences between the variables in the table.
Effect of Si Spray on Photosynthetic Pigments and Biochemical Attributes of 2 Wheat Cultivars Under Cd Regimes.
| Cultivars | Cd stress (mg/kg) | Silicon (Si) | Chl. | Chl. | Total Chl. | Total Car. | TSP (mg g-1 FW) | Anthocyanin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sahar-2006 | 0 | 0 | 1.128b ± 0.040 | 0.916b ± 0.027 | 2.04c ± 0.039 | 0.120b ± 0.003 | 1.93b ± 0.042 | 1.50c ± 0.026 |
| 1.5 | 1.185a ± 0.007 | 0.969b ± 0.019 | 2.15b ± 0.017 | 0.123b ± 0.001 | 2.18a ± 0.006 | 1.71b ± 0.029 | ||
| 3.0 | 1.219a ± 0.005 | 1.026a ± 0.005 | 2.24a ± 0.004 | 0.129a ± 0.001 | 2.29a ± 0.039 | 1.88a ± 0.069 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 0.879f ± 0.019 | 0.784def ± 0.005 | 1.66h ± 0.017 | 0.097c ± 0.002 | 1.62d ± 0.043 | 1.15f ± 0.019 | |
| 1.5 | 0.918ef ± 0.012 | 0.813cde ± 0.003 | 1.73fg ± 0.011 | 0.100bc ± 0.001 | 1.78c ± 0.033 | 1.28de ± 0.023 | ||
| 3.0 | 0.972de ± 0.005 | 0.846c ± 0.005 | 1.82e ± 0.005 | 0.106b ± 0.002 | 1.96b ± 0.045 | 1.46c ± 0.071 | ||
| 25 | 0 | 0.687hi ± 0.039 | 0.608h ± 0.020 | 1.29jk ± 0.019 | 0.074fgh ± 0.001 | 1.02j ± 0.062 | 0.85k ± 0.008 | |
| 1.5 | 0.717gh ± 0.006 | 0.632gh ± 0.006 | 1.35j ± 0.099 | 0.077fg ± 0.001 | 1.16hi ± 0.048 | 0.94ij ± 0.014 | ||
| 3.0 | 0.756g ± 0.010 | 0.684g ± 0.027 | 1.44i ± 0.031 | 0.082ef ± 0.001 | 1.30fg ± 0.030 | 1.06gh ± 0.02 | ||
| Inqalab-91 | 0 | 0 | 0.947e ± 0.013 | 0.746f ± 0.042 | 1.69gh ± 0.031 | 0.087de ± 0.004 | 1.21gh ± 0.027 | 1.20ef ± 0.006 |
| 1.5 | 1.011cd ± 0.003 | 0.769ef ± 0.023 | 1.78ef ± 0.020 | 0.091cd ± 0.002 | 1.37ef ± 0.023 | 1.30d ± 0.023 | ||
| 3.0 | 1.055c ± 0.010 | 0.826cd ± 0.013 | 1.88d ± 0.006 | 0.097c ± 0.002 | 1.48e ± 0.076 | 1.36d ± 0.033 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 0.640i ± 0.022 | 0.490j ± 0.033 | 1.13l ± 0.011 | 0.067h ± 0.002 | 0.85k ± 0.063 | 0.86jk ± 0.013 | |
| 1.5 | 0.650i ± 0.022 | 0.514ij ± 0.022 | 1.16l ± 0.018 | 0.069gh ± 0.001 | 1.02j ± 0.005 | 0.99hi ± 0.019 | ||
| 3.0 | 0.688hi ± 0.007 | 0.550i ± 0.014 | 1.24k ± 0.010 | 0.073gh ± 0.001 | 1.09ij ± 0.007 | 1.14fg ± 0.027 | ||
| 25 | 0 | 0.469k ± 0.029 | 0.325j ± 0.004 | 0.79n ± 0.025 | 0.047i ± 0.0005 | 0.51m ± 0.041 | 0.53m ± 0.014 | |
| 1.5 | 0.510jk ± 0.016 | 0.342k ± 0.010 | 0.85mn ± 0.027 | 0.049i ± 0.001 | 0.63l ± 0.019 | 0.60lm ± 0.008 | ||
| 3.0 | 0.540j ± 0.021 | 0.366k ± 0.026 | 0.91m ± 0.023 | 0.052i ± 0.001 | 0.69l ± 0.029 | 0.67l ± 0.018 |
Abbreviations: Chl., chlorophyll; Car., carotenoids; TSP, total soluble protein.
Means are followed by standard errors. Three-way ANOVA was performed and different mean values (control and treatment values) were tested by least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05 and different letters following means within the same column indicate the significant differences between the variables in the table.
Figure 1.Effect of Si spray on MDA contents, H2O2 contents and EL in the shoot of 2 wheat cultivars seedlings grown under different levels of Cd stress (n = 3 ± SE). Three-way ANOVA was performed and mean values (control and treatment values) were tested by least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05 and different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between the treatments.
Figure 2.Effect of Si spray on SOD, POD, CAT and APX contents in the shoot of 2 wheat cultivars seedlings grown under different levels of Cd stress (n = 3 ± SE). Three-way ANOVA was performed and mean values (control and treatment values) were tested by least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05 and different lowercase letters indicate the significant difference between the treatments.
Effect of Si Spray on Mineral Nutrient in 2 Wheat Cultivars Under Cd Stress.
| Cultivars | Cd stress (mg/kg) | Silicon (Si) (mM) | Root Fe2+ (µg g-1 DW) | Shoot Fe2+ (µg g-1 DW) | Root Zn2+ (µg g-1 DW) | Shoot Zn2+ (µg g-1 DW) | Root Mg2+ (µg g-1 DW) | Shoot Mg2+ (µg g-1 DW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sahar-2006 | 0 | 0 | 201.49d ± 1.70 | 154.20b ±2.72 | 87.76b ±1.81 | 31.06b ± 0.61 | 278.51cd ±4.19 | 199.62b ±1.91 |
| 1.5 | 234.82b ± 5.71 | 164.20a ±3.29 | 93.37b ±5.04 | 32.01b ± 0.93 | 295.90b ±4.37 | 226.79a ±3.75 | ||
| 3.0 | 259.11a ± 1.92 | 172.46a ± 4.76 | 99.26a ±2.54 | 33.78a ± 0.62 | 315.05a ±4.08 | 234.54a ±2.86 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 151.50f ± 7.88 | 127.13e ±3.71 | 73.64de ±1.37 | 24.15de ± 0.67 | 242.42e ±4.13 | 164.84de ±2.81 | |
| 1.5 | 183.85e ± 4.87 | 143.40cd ± 3.51 | 79.17cd ±2.37 | 25.27d ± 0.40 | 268.73d ±3.01 | 182.74c ±2.05 | ||
| 3.0 | 214.97c ± 3.84 | 150.26bc ± 1.91 | 79.96c ±1.51 | 27.41c ± 0.64 | 283.28c ±3.06 | 199.30b ±1.67 | ||
| 25 | 0 | 131.70g ± 7.13 | 111.20gh ± 4.48 | 70.30ef ±1.53 | 21.54g ± 0.55 | 217.13f ±6.15 | 136.79g ±5.88 | |
| 1.5 | 162.36f ± 6.12 | 116.40fg ±4.89 | 71.96ef ±2.21 | 22.39fg ± 0.48 | 238.39e ±3.58 | 150.19f ±2.25 | ||
| 3.0 | 185.75e ± 3.79 | 124.20ef ±3.25 | 75.42cde ± 0.93 | 23.60ef ± 0.42 | 245.00e ±1.76 | 164.35e ±1.11 | ||
| Inqalab-91 | 0 | 0 | 175.63e ± 4.42 | 114.00g ±2.14 | 60.19h ± 2.75 | 21.31g ± 0.77 | 185.99g ±2.62 | 148.79f ±2.10 |
| 1.5 | 186.01e ± 3.60 | 129.93e ±4.75 | 62.79gh ±1.04 | 22.33fg ± 0.38 | 219.70f ±3.12 | 165.76de ±2.50 | ||
| 3.0 | 199.2d ± 4.28 | 140.00d ±3.47 | 67.11fg ±1.71 | 23.54ef ± 0.61 | 241.48e ±1.79 | 173.19d ±1.43 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 115.29h ± 3.09 | 88.24i ±2.51 | 49.60i ±1.71 | 16.24i ± 0.45 | 160.02i ±3.87 | 112.01h ±1.71 | |
| 1.5 | 126.23gh ± 4.66 | 103.72h ± 2.99 | 53.49i ±1.92 | 17.76i ± 0.23 | 171.72h ±1.62 | 120.21h ±1.14 | ||
| 3.0 | 133.77g ± 2.72 | 116.79fg ±2.50 | 61.45gh ± 0.70 | 19.55h ± 0.40 | 189.61g ±5.90 | 132.73g ± 4.13 | ||
| 25 | 0 | 89.71i ± 1.40 | 64.37k ±2.02 | 31.11k ±1.11 | 9.65k ± 0.19 | 113.60k ± 4.11 | 72.52j ± 5.75 | |
| 1.5 | 93.83i ± 2.30 | 74.81j ±3.27 | 34.36k ± 0.93 | 11.26j ± 0.36 | 128.55j ±1.50 | 84.19i ±1.97 | ||
| 3.0 | 100.48i ± 1.67 | 83.54ij ±1.43 | 40.88j ± 1.34 | 12.56j ± 0.49 | 138.16j ± 0.79 | 92.56i ± 2.99 |
Abbreviations: Fe2+= iron ion; Zn2+= Zinc; Mg2+= magnesium ion.
Means are followed by standard errors. Three-way ANOVA was performed and different mean values (control and treatment values) were tested by least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05 and different letters following means within the same column indicate the significant differences between the variables in the table.
Figure 3.Effect of Si spray on Si contents in the root and shoot of 2 wheat cultivars seedlings grown under different levels of Cd stress (n = 3 ± SE). Three-way ANOVA was performed and mean values (control and treatment values) were tested by least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05 and different lowercase letters indicate the significant difference between the treatments.
Figure 4.Effect of Si spray on Cd contents in the root and shoot of 2 wheat cultivars seedlings grown under different levels of Cd stress (n = 3 ± SE). Three-way ANOVA was performed and mean values (control and treatment values) were tested by least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05 and different lowercase letters indicate the significant difference between the treatments.