Literature DB >> 34158494

Commercial afforestation can deliver effective climate change mitigation under multiple decarbonisation pathways.

Eilidh J Forster1, John R Healey1, Caren Dymond2, David Styles3,4.   

Abstract

Afforestation is an important greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation strategy but the efficacy of commercial forestry is disputed. Here, we calculate the potential GHG mitigation of a UK national planting strategy of 30,000 ha yr-1 from 2020 to 2050, using dynamic life cycle assessment. What-if scenarios vary: conifer-broadleaf composition, harvesting, product breakouts, and decarbonisation of substituted energy and materials, to estimate 100-year GHG mitigation. Here we find forest growth rate is the most important determinant of cumulative mitigation by 2120, irrespective of whether trees are harvested. A national planting strategy of commercial forest could mitigate 1.64 Pg CO2e by 2120 (cumulative), compared with 0.54-1.72 Pg CO2e for planting only conservation forests, depending on species composition. Even after heavy discounting of future product substitution credits based on industrial decarbonisation projections, GHG mitigation from harvested stands typically surpasses unharvested stands. Commercial afforestation can deliver effective GHG mitigation that is robust to future decarbonisation pathways and wood uses.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34158494     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24084-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  9 in total

1.  Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Luyssaert; E-Detlef Schulze; Annett Börner; Alexander Knohl; Dominik Hessenmöller; Beverly E Law; Philippe Ciais; John Grace
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sustainability: Five steps for managing Europe's forests.

Authors:  Silvano Fares; Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza; Piermaria Corona; Marc Palahí
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon.

Authors:  Simon L Lewis; Charlotte E Wheeler; Edward T A Mitchard; Alexander Koch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Europe's forest management did not mitigate climate warming.

Authors:  Kim Naudts; Yiying Chen; Matthew J McGrath; James Ryder; Aude Valade; Juliane Otto; Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs.

Authors:  Jonathan C Doelman; Elke Stehfest; Detlef P van Vuuren; Andrzej Tabeau; Andries F Hof; Maarten C Braakhekke; David E H J Gernaat; Maarten van den Berg; Willem-Jan van Zeist; Vassilis Daioglou; Hans van Meijl; Paul L Lucas
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Old-growth forest carbon sinks overestimated.

Authors:  Per Gundersen; Emil E Thybring; Thomas Nord-Larsen; Lars Vesterdal; Knute J Nadelhoffer; Vivian K Johannsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Forest carbon in North America: annual storage and emissions from British Columbia's harvest, 1965-2065.

Authors:  Caren C Dymond
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2012-07-24

Review 8.  Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions.

Authors:  Christina Howard; Caren C Dymond; Verena C Griess; Darius Tolkien-Spurr; G Cornelis van Kooten
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2021-03-30

9.  Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Luyssaert; Guillaume Marie; Aude Valade; Yi-Ying Chen; Sylvestre Njakou Djomo; James Ryder; Juliane Otto; Kim Naudts; Anne Sofie Lansø; Josefine Ghattas; Matthew J McGrath
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Jean Damascene Harindintwali; Zhizhang Yuan; Min Wang; Faming Wang; Sheng Li; Zhigang Yin; Lei Huang; Yuhao Fu; Lei Li; Scott X Chang; Linjuan Zhang; Jörg Rinklebe; Zuoqiang Yuan; Qinggong Zhu; Leilei Xiang; Daniel C W Tsang; Liang Xu; Xin Jiang; Jihua Liu; Ning Wei; Matthias Kästner; Yang Zou; Yong Sik Ok; Jianlin Shen; Dailiang Peng; Wei Zhang; Damià Barceló; Yongjin Zhou; Zhaohai Bai; Boqiang Li; Bin Zhang; Ke Wei; Hujun Cao; Zhiliang Tan; Liu-Bin Zhao; Xiao He; Jinxing Zheng; Nanthi Bolan; Xiaohong Liu; Changping Huang; Sabine Dietmann; Ming Luo; Nannan Sun; Jirui Gong; Yulie Gong; Ferdi Brahushi; Tangtang Zhang; Cunde Xiao; Xianfeng Li; Wenfu Chen; Nianzhi Jiao; Johannes Lehmann; Yong-Guan Zhu; Hongguang Jin; Andreas Schäffer; James M Tiedje; Jing M Chen
Journal:  Innovation (Camb)       Date:  2021-10-30

2.  Poplar's Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science.

Authors:  Xuelin Xie; Xinye Zhang; Jingfang Shen; Kebing Du
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Silvopastoral systems for offsetting livestock emissions in the tropics: a case study of a dairy farm in Costa Rica.

Authors:  Robert Brook; Eilidh Forster; David Styles; André Mancebo Mazzetto; Claudia Arndt; M Jimena Esquivel; David Chadwick
Journal:  Agron Sustain Dev       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 7.832

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.