Literature DB >> 34158463

Benchmarking Adenoma Detection Rates for Colonoscopy: Results From a US-Based Registry.

Aasma Shaukat1,2, Jennifer Holub3, Irving M Pike4, Mark Pochapin5, David Greenwald6, Colleen Schmitt7, Glenn Eisen8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is highly variable across practices, and national or population-based estimates are not available. Our aim was to study the ADR, variability of rates over time, and factors associated with detection rates of ADR in a national sample of patients undergoing colonoscopy.
METHODS: We used colonoscopies submitted to the GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Ltd. registry from 2014 to 2018 on adults aged 50-89 years. We used hierarchical logistic models to study factors associated with ADR.
RESULTS: A total of 2,646,833 colonoscopies were performed by 1,169 endoscopists during the study period. The average ADR for screening colonoscopies per endoscopist was 36.80% (SD 10.21), 44.08 (SD 10.98) in men and 31.20 (SD 9.65) in women. Adjusted to the US population, the ADR was 39.08%. There was a significant increase in ADR from screening colonoscopies over the study period from 33.93% in 2014 to 38.12% in 2018. DISCUSSION: The average ADR from a large national US sample standardized to the US population is 39.05% and has increased over time.
Copyright © 2021 by The American College of Gastroenterology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34158463     DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  3 in total

1.  Serum Chloride and Admission Status Are Potential Prognostic Markers of High-Risk Polyps: A Prospective Characterization of Colorectal Polyps in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Algassim; Toufic Semaan; Manhal A Aldaher; Abdulsalam Alluhaydan; Ameen Jaddoh; Saeed Al-Zubide; Shakir Bakkari; Naif Benragosh; Thamer Aldarsouny; Ibrahim Alruzug
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Declining Colectomy Rates for Nonmalignant Colorectal Polyps in a Large, Ethnically Diverse, Community-Based Population.

Authors:  Asim Alam; Christopher Ma; Sheng-Fang Jiang; Christopher D Jensen; Kenneth H Webb; Eshandeep S Boparai; Terry L Jue; Craig A Munroe; Suraj Gupta; Jeffrey Fox; Christopher M Hamerski; Fernando S Velayos; Douglas A Corley; Jeffrey K Lee
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 3.  Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Oliver Bendall; Joel James; Katarzyna M Pawlak; Sauid Ishaq; J Andy Tau; Noriko Suzuki; Steven Bollipo; Keith Siau
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.