| Literature DB >> 34157982 |
Mohsen Ahmadi1, Mahmoud-Reza Hemami2, Mohammad Kaboli3, Masoud Nazarizadeh4,5, Mansoureh Malekian2, Roozbeh Behrooz6, Philippe Geniez6, John Alroy7, Niklaus E Zimmermann8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The orogeny of the eastern Mediterranean region has substantially affected ecological speciation patterns, particularly of mountain-dwelling species. Mountain vipers of the genus Montivipera are among the paramount examples of Mediterranean neo-endemism, with restricted ranges in the mountains of Anatolia, the Levant, Caucasus, Alborz, and Zagros. Here we explore the phylogenetic and ecological diversification of Montivipera to reconstruct its ecological niche evolution and biogeographic history. Using 177 sequences of three mitochondrial genes, a dated molecular phylogeny of mountain vipers was reconstructed. Based on 320 occurrence points within the entire range of the genus and six climatic variables, ecological niches were modelled and used to infer ancestral niche occupancy. In addition, the biogeographic history and ancestral states of the species were reconstructed across climate gradients.Entities:
Keywords: Allopatric speciation; Biogeography; Divergence dating; Diversification; Middle East; Montivipera; Mountain orogeny; Near East; Niche evolution; Niche modelling
Year: 2021 PMID: 34157982 PMCID: PMC8220690 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01863-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol Evol ISSN: 2730-7182
Fig. 1Geographic distribution (top), dated maximum clade credibility tree (bottom, reconstructed in BEAST based on multi-locus mitochondrial data), and ancestral range estimates (inferred with BIOGEOBEARS using a DIVA-like model) of the genus Montivipera. Numbers at each node indicate mean age estimates, and blue bars the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) confidence intervals. Boxes at tips show geographic areas including each species, colour-coded for the eight areas illustrated as polygons on the map. Pie charts indicate the estimated probability of each area. Dots, triangles, and stars next to the phylogenetic tree is the species-specific indication of the occurrence points and coloured polygons on the map are the approximate range of the biogeographic areas
Fig. 2Geographic distribution of suitable habitats of mountain vipers predicted by the distribution models and used for the ancestral niche occupancy reconstruction. Potential distributions were modelled using six climatic variables
Fig. 3Inferred history of the evolution of environmental tolerances of six climatic variables within the mountain viper species based on a BEAST chronogram. Internal nodes denote the mean of climatic tolerances as estimated for the most recent common ancestor of the related extant taxa. Vertical bars and point marks show the 80% central density of environmental tolerance for each extant taxon and the related mean values, respectively. Lines and points are coloured according to clades defined in Fig. 1
Statistical evidence of the phylogenetic signal in the six climatic variables influencing mountain viper range dynamics
| Pagel’s λ | Blomberg’s K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| λ | K | |||
| Maximum temperature of warmest month | 1.032 | 0.885 | ||
| Minimum temperature of coldest month | 1.028 | 0.998 | ||
| Temperature seasonality | 1.056 | 0.807 | ||
| Precipitation of driest month | 1.054 | 0.767 | ||
| Precipitation of wettest month | 6.98e−05 | 1 | 0.243 | 0.624 |
| Precipitation seasonality | 6.98e−05 | 1 | 0.359 | 0.257 |
Fig. 4Ancestral state estimation of climatic variables for mountain vipers reconstructed based on a BEAST chronogram using the contMap function in the phytools R package