M Levin1, T McKechnie2, C C Kruse3, K Aldrich4, T P Grantcharov5, A Langerman4,5,6. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. Center for Medical Interoperability, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 5. International Center for Surgical Safety, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Ontario, Canada. 6. Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Surgical Analytics Lab, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Operating room recording, via video, audio and sensor-based recordings, is increasingly common. Yet, surgical data science is a new field without clear guidelines. The purpose of this study is to examine existing published studies of surgical recording modalities to determine which are available for use in the operating room, as a first step towards developing unified standards for this field. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were systematically searched for articles describing modalities of data collection in the operating room. Search terms included 'video-audio media', 'bio-sensing techniques', 'sound', 'movement', 'operating rooms' and others. Title, abstract and full-text screening were completed to identify relevant articles. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for included studies. RESULTS: From 3756 citations, 91 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies described 10 unique data-collection modalities for 17 different purposes in the operating room. Data modalities included video, audio, kinematic and eye-tracking among others. Data-collection purposes described included surgical trainee assessment, surgical error, surgical team communication and operating room efficiency. CONCLUSION: Effective data collection and utilization in the operating room are imperative for the provision of superior surgical care. The future operating room landscape undoubtedly includes multiple modalities of data collection for a plethora of purposes. This review acts as a foundation for employing operating room data in a way that leads to meaningful benefit for patient care.
INTRODUCTION: Operating room recording, via video, audio and sensor-based recordings, is increasingly common. Yet, surgical data science is a new field without clear guidelines. The purpose of this study is to examine existing published studies of surgical recording modalities to determine which are available for use in the operating room, as a first step towards developing unified standards for this field. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were systematically searched for articles describing modalities of data collection in the operating room. Search terms included 'video-audio media', 'bio-sensing techniques', 'sound', 'movement', 'operating rooms' and others. Title, abstract and full-text screening were completed to identify relevant articles. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for included studies. RESULTS: From 3756 citations, 91 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies described 10 unique data-collection modalities for 17 different purposes in the operating room. Data modalities included video, audio, kinematic and eye-tracking among others. Data-collection purposes described included surgical trainee assessment, surgical error, surgical team communication and operating room efficiency. CONCLUSION: Effective data collection and utilization in the operating room are imperative for the provision of superior surgical care. The future operating room landscape undoubtedly includes multiple modalities of data collection for a plethora of purposes. This review acts as a foundation for employing operating room data in a way that leads to meaningful benefit for patient care.
Authors: Ryan Daniel; Tyler McKechnie; Colin C Kruse; Marc Levin; Yung Lee; Aristithes G Doumouras; Dennis Hong; Cagla Eskicioglu Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Recai Yilmaz; Alexander Winkler-Schwartz; Nykan Mirchi; Aiden Reich; Sommer Christie; Dan Huy Tran; Nicole Ledwos; Ali M Fazlollahi; Carlo Santaguida; Abdulrahman J Sabbagh; Khalid Bajunaid; Rolando Del Maestro Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2022-04-26
Authors: Ali M Fazlollahi; Mohamad Bakhaidar; Ahmad Alsayegh; Recai Yilmaz; Alexander Winkler-Schwartz; Nykan Mirchi; Ian Langleben; Nicole Ledwos; Abdulrahman J Sabbagh; Khalid Bajunaid; Jason M Harley; Rolando F Del Maestro Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-02-01
Authors: Niall O'Connor; Michael Sugrue; Conor Melly; Gearoid McGeehan; Magda Bucholc; Aileen Crawford; Paul O'Connor; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Imtiaz Wani; Zsolt J Balogh; Vishal G Shelat; Giovanni D Tebala; Belinda De Simone; Hani O Eid; Mircea Chirica; Gustavo P Fraga; Salomone Di Saverio; Edoardo Picetti; Luigi Bonavina; Marco Ceresoli; Andreas Fette; Boris Sakakushe; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Raul Coimbra; Richard Ten Broek; Andreas Hecker; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrey Litvin; Philip Stahel; Edward Tan; Kaoru Koike; Fausto Catena; Michele Pisano; Federico Coccolini; Alison Johnston Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 5.469