| Literature DB >> 34156352 |
Bo Wu1, Wenzhuo Yang2, Zhaoyu Fu1, Haoqun Xie2, Zhen Guo2, Daqun Liu3, Junliang Ge2, Sheng Zhong4, Luwei Liu5, Jingyi Liu5, Dong Zhu1.
Abstract
To identify novel prognostic and therapeutic targets for osteosarcoma patients, we compared the gene expression profiles of osteosarcoma and control tissues from the GSE42352 dataset in the Gene Expression Omnibus. Differentially expressed genes were subjected to Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Gene Set Enrichment and protein-protein interaction network analyses. Survival curve analyses indicated that osteosarcoma patients with lower mRNA levels of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and topoisomerase II alpha had better prognoses. Various computer-aided techniques were used to identify potential CDK1 inhibitors for osteosarcoma patients, and PHA-793887 was predicted to be a safe drug with a high binding affinity for CDK1. In vitro, MTT and colony formation assays demonstrated that PHA-793887 reduced the viability and clonogenicity of osteosarcoma cells, while a scratch assay suggested that PHA-793887 impaired the migration of these cells. Flow cytometry experiments revealed that PHA-793887 dose-dependently induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays indicated that CDK1 expression in osteosarcoma cells declined with increasing PHA-793887 concentrations. These results suggest that PHA-793887 could be a promising new treatment for osteosarcoma.Entities:
Keywords: bioinformatics; bone science; drug treatment; osteosarcoma; prognosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34156352 PMCID: PMC8266349 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Study framework. The first image was selected to represent the tissue datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus database.
Figure 2DEGs between osteosarcoma and normal tissues. (A) Heat map of the DEGs in GSE42352. (B) DEGs colored by cluster ID. DEGs in the same cluster ID nodes are closely related to each other. (C) DEGs colored by P-value. Terms with more significant P-values contain more genes.
Detailed information about the hub genes.
| TOP2A | 131 | 0.12491649 | RRM2 | 107 | 0.0238615 |
| CDK1 | 128 | 0.04926424 | CCNB2 | 106 | 0.0133571 |
| CDC20 | 111 | 0.02655093 | FEN1 | 105 | 0.0114579 |
| MAD2L1 | 110 | 0.01919526 | CENPA | 105 | 0.01718783 |
| CCNA2 | 110 | 0.00594959 | TYMS | 104 | 0.01483465 |
| RFC4 | 109 | 0.0092881 | CDC45 | 103 | 0.00353462 |
| CDKN3 | 108 | 0.01945569 | BUB1 | 102 | 0.00773264 |
| AURKA | 108 | 0.02507401 | MCM4 | 101 | 0.00264547 |
| AURKB | 107 | 0.00713131 | MCM2 | 100 | 0.00314447 |
Figure 3Top three modules from the PPI network.
Figure 4Survival curve analysis, hub gene validation and molecular docking analysis. (A) Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and OS in osteosarcoma patients based on CDK1 and TOP2A expression. (B) Validation of TOP2A, CDK1, AURKA, MAD2L1 and RRM2 expression in vitro. *P < 0.05. (C) Crystal structure of CDK1. (D) Ramachandran diagrams of CDK1. (E) Structure of PHA-793887. (F) 2D intermolecular interaction diagram of the PHA-793887/CDK1 complex. (G) Schematic drawing of the interactions between CDK1 and PHA-793887. (H) Potential energy profile and root-mean-square deviation curve of the PHA-793887/CDK1 complex obtained from the molecular dynamics simulation.
ADME properties of the top 20 compounds.
| 1 | ZINC000000023894 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | ZINC000001639355 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 3 | ZINC000002568154 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 | ZINC000003814479 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | ZINC000003924157 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | ZINC000003937395 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 | ZINC000003938688 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 8 | ZINC000013983251 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | ZINC000014806879 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | ZINC000016052857 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 11 | ZINC000021288966 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 12 | ZINC000028821265 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 13 | ZINC000034894449 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | ZINC000040442496 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | ZINC000043128366 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | ZINC000043131434 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | ZINC000052509437 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | ZINC000053119602 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | ZINC000225710809 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | ZINC000261187328 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Abbreviations: BBB: blood-brain barrier; CYP2D6: cytochrome P-450 2D6; PPB: plasma protein binding.
Abbreviations: Aqueous-solubility level: 0: extremely low; 1: very low, but possible; 2: low; 3: good.
Abbreviations: BBB level: 0: very high penetrant; 1: high; 2: medium; 3: low; 4: undefined.
Abbreviations: CYP2D6 level: 0: noninhibitor; 1: inhibitor.
Abbreviations: Hepatotoxicity: 0: nontoxic; 1: toxic.
Abbreviations: Human-intestinal absorption level: 0: good; 1: moderate; 2: poor; 3: very poor.
Abbreviations: PPB: 0: absorbent weak; 1: absorbent strong.
Toxicity of the top 20 compounds.
| 1 | ZINC000000023894 | 0 | 1 | 0.077 | 0.382 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | ZINC000001639355 | 0 | 0.151 | 0 | 0.025 | 0.014 | 1 |
| 3 | ZINC000002568154 | 0.002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.005 |
| 4 | ZINC000003814479 | 0.001 | 0.953 | 1 | 1 | 0.008 | 0 |
| 5 | ZINC000003924157 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.442 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | ZINC000003937395 | 0 | 0.998 | 0 | 0.024 | 0.979 | 1 |
| 7 | ZINC000003938688 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.002 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | ZINC000013983251 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 |
| 9 | ZINC000014806879 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.992 |
| 10 | ZINC000016052857 | 0.841 | 0.003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 11 | ZINC000021288966 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.955 | 1 | 1 |
| 12 | ZINC000028821265 | 0.593 | 0.984 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.007 |
| 13 | ZINC000034894449 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | ZINC000040442496 | 0 | 0.058 | 0 | 0.003 | 0.449 | 0.018 |
| 15 | ZINC000043128366 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.996 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | ZINC000043131434 | 0.997 | 0.009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | ZINC000052509437 | 0 | 0 | 0.791 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | ZINC000053119602 | 0 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.884 | 0 | 0.991 |
| 19 | ZINC000225710809 | 0 | 0.127 | 0 | 0.967 | 0 | 0.001 |
| 20 | ZINC000261187328 | 0.252 | 0 | 0 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.055 |
Abbreviations: NTP: U.S. National Toxicology Program; DTP: developmental toxicity potential.
NTP<0.3(noncarcinogen);>0.8(carcinogen).
Ames<0.3(nonmutagen);>0.8(mutagen).
DTP<0.3(nontoxic);>0.8(toxic).
Figure 5Anti-osteosarcoma effects of PHA-793887. (A) Cellular viability of osteosarcoma cells treated with PHA-793887. (B) Colony formation assay results demonstrating the anti-proliferative effects of PHA-793887 in MG63 and U20S cells. (C) Scratch assay results demonstrating that PHA-793887 suppressed the migration of osteosarcoma cells. (D) Numbers of clones formed by MG64 and U20S cells. (E) Images from the wound-healing assay, representing the migration capacity of osteosarcoma cells. (F) Apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells treated with PHA-793887.
Figure 6Anti-osteosarcoma effects of PHA-793887 targeting CDK1. (A) Results of western blot. (B) Relative expression of CDK1 (%Control) (C) CDK1 expression in MG63 cells.