| Literature DB >> 34155870 |
Fahimeh Akbarian1, Mohsen Rahmani1, Marziyeh Tavalaee1, Navid Abedpoor2, Mozhdeh Taki1, Kamran Ghaedi2, Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effects of using high-fat (HF) and advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) containing dietsto induce obesity and diabetes on sperm function in mice.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced Glycosylation End Products; Diabetes Mellitus; High-Fat Diet; Reactive Oxygen Species; Sperm Parameters
Year: 2021 PMID: 34155870 PMCID: PMC8233922 DOI: 10.22074/IJFS.2021.137231.1022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fertil Steril ISSN: 2008-0778
Fig.1Sperm parameters of different studied groups after 28 weeks of feeding C57/BL6 mice with special diets. A. Sperm concentration (106 /mL). B. Sperm motility (%). C. Total sperms with abnormal morphology (%). Data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean. HF; High-fat diet, AGEs; Advanced glycation end-products, * ; P<0.05, and **; P<0.01.
Fig.3The schematic diagram of experimental results. All groups of diets show an increase in body weight more than the control group diet, although the 60% HF diet is less than the 45% HF, and AGE. HF diets (45% and 60%). Similarity, the assessment of metabolic tests (FBS, GTT, Insulin concentration, HOMA IR, HOMA beta) demonstrate similar results as body weight (g). Unlike sperm motility (%), sperm concentration (106 / ml) and sperm morphology (%) do not show any significant difference among diet groups. While, the assessments of sperm DNA damage (%) showed an increase in 45% HF diet group compared to all the groups while percentage of sperm protamine deficiency demonstrate a highly negative effect in all diet groups compared to control diet group. Approximately, the assessments of sperm ROS [lipid peroxidation (%) and intracellular oxidation (%)] reveal an increase in all the groups compared to control group. HF; High-fat diet, AGE; Advanced glycation end-products, FBS; Fasting blood sugar, GTT; Glucose tolerance test, and HOMA IR; Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance
Characteristics of special mouse diets for each different studied group
| Diet composition (% w/w) | Diet groups (n=5) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal diets | 45% HF | 60% HF | 45% HF-AGEs | 60% HF-AGEs | |
| Protein | 20.56 | 19.4 | 20 | 28 | 23 |
| Fat | 12.55 | 45 | 60 | 45 | 60 |
| Carbohydrate | 47.71 | 21.59 | 13.8 | 15.49 | 9.56 |
| Fiber | 3.8 | 2.26 | 1.2 | 3.35 | 0.96 |
| Ash | 10.38 | 7.85 | 0.9 | 7.18 | 5.9 |
| Moisture | 5 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 0.98 | 0.58 |
| Calories (kcal/g) | 3.8 | 5.6 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 6.7 |
HF; High-fat diet and AGEs; Advanced glycation end-products.
Body weight of different studied groups at the beginning of the study and after 28 weeks of feeding special diets
| Groups (n=5) | Body weight (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | After 28 weeks | Weight gain | |
| Control | 14 ± 0.02 | 26 ± 0.5 | 12 ± 0.3 |
| 45% HF | 13 ± 1.5 | 50.5 ± 0.5* | 37 ± 0.4* |
| 60% HF | 14.1 ± 1 | 37.8 ± 0.2* | 23 ± 0.1* |
| 45% HF-AGEs | 12 ± 2 | 43 ± 1* | 31 ± 0.8* |
| 60% HF-AGEs | 13.5 ± 1.5 | 62 ± 0.5* | 48.5 ± 1* |
Data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean. HF; High-fat diet, and AGEs; Advanced glycation end-products. Significant difference is presented as *P<0.05.
Insulin concentration and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) in different studied groups after 28 weeks of keeping C57/BL6 mice on special diets
| Groups (n=5) | Insulin concentration (ng/mL) | HOMA-insulin resistance | HOMA-beta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.35 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 3.06 ± 0.25 |
| 45% HF | 1.29 ± 0.04* | 0.63 ± 0.02* | 4.31 ± 0.21* |
| 60% HF | 0.82 ± 0.09* | 0.31 ± 0.02* | 3.15 ± 0.20 |
| 45% HF-AGEs | 1.62 ± 0.07* | 0.78 ± 0.01* | 5.27 ± 0.27* |
| 60% HF-AGEs | 3.95 ± 0.19** | 2.56 ± 0.13** | 7.15 ± 0.28** |
Data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean. HF; High-fat diet, AGEs; Advanced glycation end-products. Significant difference is presented as *P<0.05 and **P<0.01.