Naeem Erfani Majd1,2, Mohammad Reza Tabandeh2,3, S Hima Hosseinifar4, Mahin Sadeghi4. 1. Department of Basic Sciences, Histology Section, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.Email: naeemalbo@yahoo.com. 2. Stem Cell and Transgenic Technology Research Center, Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. 3. Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. 4. Department of Basic Sciences, Histology Section, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Cisplatin [CIS-diaminedichloroplatinum (II)] is one
of the most effective anticancer drugs which is used for
treatment of a vast variety of human cancers. The anticancer activity of CIS is due to multiple mechanisms such
as induction of DNA damage, oxidative stress, and programmed cell death (apoptosis) (1).Despite the fact that CIS is a useful anticancer drug, it is
very toxic and induces several side effects including reproductive toxicity, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity (1, 2). Reproductive toxicity is one of the most common side effects
of CIS in treated patients (2-5). CIS causes severe testicular
damage which is characterized by apoptosis of germ cell,
dysfunction of Leydig cell, testicular steroidogenic disorder
and spermatogenic damage (3-6). The precise mechanism of
reproductive toxicity induced by CIS is not fully established,
however oxidative stress has been known as the major cause
of CIS-related testicular dysfunction (5, 6). Hence, several
investigators have used antioxidant compounds to reduce reproductive damages caused by CIS (2, 5, 6). For example,
olive leaf extract which contains flavonoid and polyphenolic
compounds ameliorated CIS-induced testicular oxidative
stress in rats (5). Also, fenugreek seed extract reduced oxidative stress and testicular tissue damage induced by CIS and
improved spermatogenesis in the rats (6).Aloe barbadensis Miller or AL, is a perennial shrubby plant of the
Liliaceae family. It considered an important medicinal herb because of its many medicinal
activities including antitumor, antioxidant, anti-allergic, anti-viral, and
anti-inflammatory properties. It has been proposed that the antioxidant activity of AL may
be a major property of this plant used in the treatment of several diseases. The antioxidant
property of AL is due to a large amount of antioxidants substances such as vitamins (A, C, B
and E), flavonoids, phenolic compounds, and polysaccharides (7). Several researchers have
provided experimental evidence for the reproprotective effect of AL in experimental animals
(8-11). These studies have shown that AL can efficiently attenuate the testicular alteration
induced by some drugs and heavy metals (8, 9). Other studies reported that AL due to its
antioxidant compounds (especially vitamin E) can improve testicular weight, height of the
germinal epithelium and diameter of seminiferous tubule, and ameliorate reductions in the
number of testicular cells. Also, phenolic and flavonoids contents of AL can be effective in
increasing the antioxidant enzymes activity and decreasing lipid peroxidation that can cause
extensive damage to cell membranes lipids (8-11).It has been found that oxidative stress plays a major role
in the pathogenesis of reproductive toxicity induced by CIS.
Because of the antioxidant property of AL gel, it was hypothesized that AL may attenuate CIS- mediated gonadotoxicity
in rats. Therefore, this study was designed for the first time,
to examine possible protective effects of AL gel on gonadotoxicity induced by CIS via evaluation of epididymal sperm
parameters, alterations of testicular tissue, testosterone levels, and oxidative/antioxidant markers in the testis of rats.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of A. vera gel and analysis of its antioxidant
properties
AL gel powder (A. barbadensis) was obtained from
Barij Essence Pharmaceutical Co (Kashan, Iran). Total
flavonoids content (TFC) was measured by aluminum
chloride colorimetric assay (12). The catechin solutions
(0-25 μg/mL) were prepared for flavonoid assessment.
Aliquots (25 μL) of each AL gel (10 mg in 1 ml distilled
water) and standard were mixed with 125 μL distilled water followed by adding 8 μL of 5% sodium nitrate. After
5 minutes, 0.15 ml of 10% aluminum chloride solution
was added to 15 μL of that mixture. The absorbance was
measured at 517 nm. TFC is expressed as the percentage
of catechin equivalents (QE) per 100 g dry weight, and
was determined from the standard calibration curve.Total phenolic content (TPC) of AL gel was estimated
using the Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) and aluminum chloride
colorimetric assay as described by Im et al. (12). Contents
are expressed as the percentage of gallic acid equivalents
(GAE) per 100 g dry weight of AL gel.
Animals and experimental groups
In this experimental study, a total of forty-eight healthy male Wistar rats (180-200 g) were maintained under
standard laboratory conditions (12-hour light: 12-hour
dark at 22 ± 2 °C) and fed with commercial rat pellets
(Pars Animal Feed Co, Tehran, Iran) and water. All experimental assays were approved by the Ethics Committee
of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz for animal and
human experiments (EE/99.3.02.15058/ssu.ac.ir).After a quarantine period of 7 days, the rats were divided randomly into 6 groups (n=8) as follows: control
group: rats fed with a standard diet and kept in normal
conditions. CIS group (CIS): rats received CIS intraperitoneally (i.p) at a dose of 5 mg/kg on days 7, 14, 21, and
28 of the experiment. AL group (AL): AL gel powder was
dissolved in distilled water and administered orally at a
dose of 400 mg/kg/day for 35 days. MET group (MET):
rats received MET (200 mg/kg/day, orally) for 35 days.
CIS and AL group (CIS-AL): rats received CIS (i.p) at a
dose of 5 mg/kg on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of the experiment and AL (400 mg/kg/day, orally) for 35 days. CIS and
MET group (CIS-MET): rats received CIS (i.p) at a dose
of 5 mg/kg on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of the experiment
and MET (200 mg/kg/day, orally) for 35 days.The experiment lasted for 35 days (13). The dose of CIS
was selected based on a published report (14). The dosing
regimen for AL and MET were selected based on reports
by Behmanesh et al. (13) and Sahu et al. (15), respectively.
Sample collection
All rats were anesthetized using ketamine and xylazine
(100 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, respectively), (Alfasan Chemical Co., Woerden-Netherlands) (16).The blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture and centrifuged (at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes). Serum samples were separated and then stored at -20˚C
for testosterone hormone analysis. Afterward, testes and
epididymis were obtained from the abdominal cavity.
The weight, dimensions (length and diameter) and volume of testes were measured using a digital scale, a caliper, and water displacement method, respectively (17).
The left testis was fixed in a 10% buffered formalin solution for histological analyses and the right testes were
stored at -20°C for oxidant/antioxidant assessment. The
epididymis tissue samples were used for the analysis of
sperm parameters.
The testicular index
The relative testis weight ratio (%) was calculated using the formula: (absolute weight of the testis/ total body
weight)×100 (5).
Histological procedures
The formalin-fixed testes were embedded in paraffin blocks,
then sectioned (5-μm thickness) by a microtome (Leica RM
2125, Leica Microsystems Nussloch GmbH, Germany). Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
Morphometrical analyses
For this purpose, 100 cross sections of seminiferous
were chosen randomly in 5 non-serial sections per animal (10 tubules in the central zone and 10 tubules in the
peripheral (sub-capsular) zone of each section). Then,
the seminiferous tubule diameter and height of germinal
epithelium were measured at ×10 magnification. Also,
Sertoli, Leydig, spermatogonia, primary spermatocyte,
early spermatid and late spermatid cells were counted in a
marked scale (150 µm) at ×40 magnification (18, 19). All
measurements were performed under a light microscope
(Olympus Optical Co., Japan) using Dino-Lite digital lens
(with Dino capture software, FDP2, Taiwan).Spermiogenesis index (SI) and tubular differentiation
index (TDI) were calculated for spermatogenesis assay.
SI index was calculated using the following formula:(Seminiferous tubules contained sperm/seminiferous
tubules without sperm)×100.For TDI index, the percentage of tubules that contained
three or more differentiated spermatogenic cells from the
type A spermatogonia (i.e. intermediate or type B spermatogonia, spermatocytes, or spermatids) were calculated (18).
Analysis of sperm parameters
The cauda epididymis was minced finely in (5 ml) Ham’s F-10 medium and placed at 37°C for
15 minutes. Spermatozoa in the epididymis were counted by a standard hemocytometric method
and motility of sperm (progressive, non- progressive, and immotile) was evaluated under a
light microscope (Olympus Optical Co., Japan) at 3 consecutive estimates and reported as
mean (20). Sperm viability and morphology were evaluated by the methods described by Turk
et al. (21) and Adibmoradi et al. (18). Briefly, a 10 μL sperm suspension was slowly mixed
with 40 μL eosinnigrosin (1.67% eosin, 10% nigrosin and 0.1 M sodium citrate). Then, 10 μL
of this mixture was transferred to a glass slide and spread slowly by another slide. After
preparation of smears, viability and morphology of sperms were evaluated. Spermatozoa with
red head were classified as dead sperm and spermatozoa with white head were classified as
live sperm (18). Also, sperms were screened and classified into normal and abnormal types,
and then the percentage of abnormality was determined for each group (21).
Tissue preparation for oxidant/antioxidant markers assay
Here, 100 mg of the right testicular tissue sample was
homogenized in 500 μL RIPA lysis buffer (1 mM EDTA,
150 mM NaCl, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1%
Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCL; pH=8, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) by a glass homogenizer
(Heidolph, Germany). Homogenate was centrifuged at
10000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C (Centrifuge 5415 R; Eppendorf AG, Germany) and the supernatant was collected
and stored at -70°C for subsequent analysis. The protein
concentration of the supernatant was estimated using the
Bradford method (22).
Analyses of lipid peroxidation levels and antioxidant
enzymes activities
The content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in the testis
was assessed as a lipid peroxidation marker using the
thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) assay
with slight modifications (23). The MDA concentration
was obtained based on MDA-TBARS complex optical density at 532 nm wavelength in comparison with
the standard curve of MDA. The MDA results are expressed as nmol/mg of protein. Superoxide dismutase
(SOD) activity was determined by the nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction assay, as described by Kakkar
et al. (24). Finally, glutathione-peroxidase (GPx) activity was evaluated by a GPx detection kit according
to the manufacturer’s instructions (RANSEL, Randox
Com, UK). Both SOD and GPx activities are expressed
as units/mg protein.
Testosterone analysis
Testosterone concentration in the serum samples of the
experimental groups was quantitatively assessed through
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the
Diametra testosterone ELISA kit (Diametra Co, Italy), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Testosterone results are expressed as ng/dl.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and
were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences among various groups were
assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test. In all cases, P<0.05 was regarded
as significant.
Results
Phytochemical content of A. vera gel
The results showed that concentrations of the total phenol and flavonoid contents in the AL gel were
49.81 μg GAE/mg and 56.42 μg QE /mg of gel powder, respectively
Relative weight and dimensions of the testis
The results showed that CIS caused a significant
(P<0.05) decrease in relative weight, length, diameter and
volume of both the right and left testes compared to the
control group. The co-administration of AL and CIS significantly increased relative weight, length and diameter
of the testes (right and left), and volume of the right testis
compared to the CIS group (P<0.05). Although, there was
a numerical increase in the volume of the left testis in the
CIS-AL group, it was not statistically significant. Treatment of CIS-treated rats with MET significantly attenuated the reduction of relative weight, length and volume of
both the right and left testes and diameter of the left testis
(P<0.05). Also, MET increased the diameter of the right
testis, however this change was not significant compared
to the CIS group (Table 1).
Table 1
Relative weight, volume and dimensions of testis in different groups
Groups testicular parameters
Control
CIS
AL
MET
CIS-AL
CIS-MET
Relative testicular weight (%)
Right
0.60 ± 0.03
0.46 ± 0.06a
0.61 ± 0.03b
0.61 ± 0.04b
0.59 ± 0.07b
0.60 ± 0.03b
Left
0.59 ± 0.02
0.44 ± 0.06a
0.62 ± 0.03b
0.63 ± 0.06b
0.59 ± 0.01b
0.59 ± 0.02b
Length (mm)
Right
19.00 ± 2.00
14.00 ± 1.58a
19.33 ± 2.08b
19.00 ± 1.87b
18.60 ± 2.19b
18.20 ± 2.86b
Left
19.33 ± 0.57
14.50 ± 0.50a
19.66 ± 2.08b
19.33 ± 1.57b
18.20 ± 0.43b
18.66 ± 1.15b
Diameter (mm)
Right
8.20 ± 1.30
5.20 ± 0.83a
8.33 ± 0.57b
8.00 ± 1.00b
7.60 ± 1.51b
7.40 ± 1.34
Left
8.66 ± 0.57
6.83 ± 0.28a
8.66 ± 0.28b
8.50 ± 0.50b
8.16 ± 0.28b
8.33 ± 0.57b
Volume (ml)
Right
1.66 ± 0.15
1.03 ± 0.20a
1.73 ± 0.15b
1.60 ± 0.10b
1.53 ± 0.15b
1.50 ± 0.10b
Left
1.53 ± 0.23
0.82 ± 0.10a
1.53 ± 0.12b
1.43 ± 0.15b
1.16 ± 0.05
1.23 ± 0.06b
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly different:
a ; Significant change from the control group at P<0.05,
b; Significant change from the CIS group at P<0.05, Control;
Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg), AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg),
and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).
Relative weight, volume and dimensions of testis in different groupsData were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly different:
a ; Significant change from the control group at P<0.05,
b; Significant change from the CIS group at P<0.05, Control;
Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg), AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg),
and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).Testicular histopathology in different groups (H&E). A-C. The seminiferous
tubules with normal germinal epithelium (N), interstitial tissue (IT) and active
spermatogenesis in control, A. vera (400 mg/kg) and metformin (200
mg/kg) groups, respectively. D. Atrophy (AT), vacoulation (VA) and
decreasing of spermatogenesisin cisplatin (5 mg/kg) group. E, F. A
considerable improve in the seminiferous tubules observed in CIS-AL (400 mg/kg
A. vera+5 mg/kg cispaltin) and CIS-MT (200 mg/kg metformin+5 mg/kg
cispaltin) groups, but VA, desquamation (black stars) and interstitial edema (white
stars) were seen still. LY; Leydig cell, SR; Sertoli cell, SG; Spermatogonia, PS;
Primary spermatocyte, ES; Early spermatid, and LS; Late spermatids.
Histological findings
The testicular tissue of the control group composed of a
high density of normal shape testicular tubules surrounded by interstitial connective tissues. Seminiferous tubules
lined by a stratified germinal epithelium, showed features
of active spermatogenesis. Spermatogonia cells with
heterochromatin and rounded nuclei rested on the basal
lamina. Primary spermatocytes were the largest spermatogenic cells in the germinal epithelium with different
shapes of chromatin. Furthermore, early-stage spermatids
with euchromatin and round nuclei and late-stage spermatids with heterochromatin and elongated nuclei, were
attached to the membrane of Sertoli cells. Also, Sertoli
cells rested on the basal lamina and had large, euchromatin nuclei with prominent nucleolus. The Leydig cells in
interstitial connective tissues had eosinophilic cytoplasm
with large and round nuclei (Fig .1A). In AL (Fig .1B, AL)
and MET (Fig .1C, MET) treated groups, the seminiferous tubules showed normal cells associations without any
structural changes compared to the control group (Fig.1B,
C). CIS caused atypical morphological features such as
disorganization, and desquamation in the seminiferous
tubules. Also, widespread atrophy and loss of all germ
cells and extensive vacuolation in the epithelium were observed in CIS-treated rats. In addition, maturation arrest
and absence of spermatozoa in the lumen in a majority
of seminiferous tubules were significant (Fig .1D). Co-administration of AL and CIS normalized these histological
changes and amended spermatogenesis when compared
with the CIS alone group; though a slight vacuolation was
found, desquamation was still observed in the seminiferous tubules (Fig .1E). Likewise, MET attenuated the histological abnormalities induced by CIS, and protected the
testicular tubules although it was less than that seen for
AL (Fig .1F).
Fig.1
Testicular histopathology in different groups (H&E). A-C. The seminiferous
tubules with normal germinal epithelium (N), interstitial tissue (IT) and active
spermatogenesis in control, A. vera (400 mg/kg) and metformin (200
mg/kg) groups, respectively. D. Atrophy (AT), vacoulation (VA) and
decreasing of spermatogenesisin cisplatin (5 mg/kg) group. E, F. A
considerable improve in the seminiferous tubules observed in CIS-AL (400 mg/kg
A. vera+5 mg/kg cispaltin) and CIS-MT (200 mg/kg metformin+5 mg/kg
cispaltin) groups, but VA, desquamation (black stars) and interstitial edema (white
stars) were seen still. LY; Leydig cell, SR; Sertoli cell, SG; Spermatogonia, PS;
Primary spermatocyte, ES; Early spermatid, and LS; Late spermatids.
Morphometrical finding
The number of Sertoli, Leydig, spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes, early and late spermatids cells
(Table 2), germinal epithelium thickness, diameter of
seminiferous tubule and the spermatogenesis indexes
(TDI and SI) decreased in the central and peripheral
(sub-capsular) zones of the testis after the CIS treatment (P<0.05, Fig .2). But, administration of AL and
MET along with CIS significantly restored these alterations (P<0.05, Table 2, Fig .2). The morphometrical parameters in control, AL, and MET groups were
almost identical.
Table 2
Comparison of the number of testicular cells (Leydig, Sertoli, spermatogonia, primary spermatocyte, early and late spermatid) in different groups
Groups parameters
Control
CIS
AL
MET
CIS-AL
CIS-MET
Leydig cells
Central
16.26 ± 1.85
7.66 ± 1.77a
16.01 ± 0.58b
15.66 ± 0.61b
12.20 ± 1.00
11.93 ± 1.51
Peripheral
11.26 ± 1.00
5.00 ± 2.16a
11.46 ± 0.94b
13.66 ± 0.64b
10.86 ± 0.98b
10.53 ± 1.36b
Sertoli cells
Central
5.40 ± 0.60
2.33 ± 0.80a
5.20 ± 0.91b
5.06 ± 0.80b
4.20 ± 0.60
4.40 ± 0.52b
Peripheral
5.00 ± 0.91
1.86 ± 0.70a
4.60 ± 0.91b
5.13 ± 0.64b
3.53 ± 0.11b
3.13 ± 0.80
Spermatogonia
Central
14.46 ± 2.40
6.40 ± 1.50a
14.60 ± 0.80b
15.33 ± 0.80b
10.80 ± 0.60b
10.20 ± 1.24ab
Peripheral
9.86 ± 2.10
5.86 ± 0.75a
10.06 ± 2.20b
9.93 ± 1.70b
7.40 ± 1.24ab
8.13 ± 0.70ab
Primary spermatocyte
Central
15.60 ± 0.72
7.26 ± 0.61a
15.33 ± 1.40b
16.26 ± 1.00b
10.53 ± 0.83ab
11.00 ± 1.96 ab
sub-capsular
7.80 ± 0.60
4.80 ± 0.40a
7.33 ± 0.50b
7.86 ± 0.41b
6.80 ± 0.40b
5.86 ± 0.50a
Early spermatid
Central
63.73 ± 10.21
14.06 ± 2.91a
54.63 ± 8.80b
58.46 ± 5.28b
38.60 ± 7.68ab
42.13 ± 3.55ab
Peripheral
27.13 ± 2.38
7.93±2.60a
26.73 ± 1.50b
25.40 ± 4.49b
15.26 ± 2.60ab
17.80 ± 1.40ab
Late spermatid
Central
56.66 ± 9.16
19.20±6.39a
62.00 ± 8.19b
50.46 ± 2.66b
39.80 ± 2.82b
44.73 ± 8.76b
Peripheral
24.33 ± 3.62
5.66±2.93a
26.20 ± 4.72b
22.40 ± 2.90b
14.66 ± 3.84
16.06 ± 1.40b
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly different:
a ; Significant change from the control group at P<0.05,
b; Significant change from the CIS group at P<0.05, Control;
Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg), AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg),
MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg), CIS-AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg)+cisplatin
(5 mg/kg), and CIS-MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg)+cisplatin (5 mg/kg).
Fig.2
Comparison of the spermatogenesis indexes, germinal epithelium thickness and diameter of
seminiferous tubules in different groups. A. Spermiogenesis index,
B. Tubular differentiation index, C. Seminiferous tubule
diameter, and D. Germinal epithelium thickness. Data were expressed as
mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly different:
a ; Significant change from the control group at P<0.05,
b ; Significant change from the CIS group at P<0.05, Control;
Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/ kg), AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg),
and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).
Comparison of the spermatogenesis indexes, germinal epithelium thickness and diameter of
seminiferous tubules in different groups. A. Spermiogenesis index,
B. Tubular differentiation index, C. Seminiferous tubule
diameter, and D. Germinal epithelium thickness. Data were expressed as
mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly different:
a ; Significant change from the control group at P<0.05,
b ; Significant change from the CIS group at P<0.05, Control;
Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/ kg), AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg),
and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).
Comparison of MDA level and antioxidant activities
Figure 3 shows the changes in MDA level and activities of antioxidant enzymes in testis tissues of different
groups. There was a significant increase in MDA level
along with a significant reduction of SOD and GPx activities in CIS-treated rats compared to the control group
(P<0.05, Fig .3). Nevertheless, administration of AL or
MET together with CIS significantly reduced the MDA
level and elevated antioxidant enzymes activities in comparison to the CIS group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in MDA level and antioxidant enzymes
activities in the AL and MET groups compared to the
control group (Fig .3).
Fig.3
Comparison of antioxidant enzyme activities, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and serum testosterone
levels between groups. A. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity, B.
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, C. Malondialdehyde levels,
and D. Testosterone levels. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with
different superscripts are significantly different: a ; Significant change
from the control group at P<0.05, b ; Significant change from the
CIS group at P<0.05, Control; Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg),
AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg), and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).
Comparison of serum testosterone level
As showed in Figure 3, testosterone level was significantly lower in CIS group rats compared to the other
groups (P<0.05, Fig .3). Treatment of CIS rats by AL and
MET significantly ameliorated the reduction of testosterone level (P<0.05). AL and MET groups presented no
significant difference in the serum testosterone level compared to the control group (P>0.05, Fig .3).Comparison of the number of testicular cells (Leydig, Sertoli, spermatogonia, primary spermatocyte, early and late spermatid) in different groupsData were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly different:
a ; Significant change from the control group at P<0.05,
b; Significant change from the CIS group at P<0.05, Control;
Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg), AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg),
MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg), CIS-AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg)+cisplatin
(5 mg/kg), and CIS-MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg)+cisplatin (5 mg/kg).Comparison of antioxidant enzyme activities, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and serum testosterone
levels between groups. A. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity, B.
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, C. Malondialdehyde levels,
and D. Testosterone levels. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with
different superscripts are significantly different: a ; Significant change
from the control group at P<0.05, b ; Significant change from the
CIS group at P<0.05, Control; Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg),
AL; A. vera (400 mg/kg), and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).Comparison of sperm parameters in different groupsData were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly
different: a ; Significant change from the control group at
P<0.05, b; Significant change from the CIS group at
P<0.05, Control; Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg), AL; A.
vera (400 mg/kg), and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).
Comparison of sperm parameters
A comparison of the groups with regard to sperm parameters is presented in Table 3. The sperm concentration, viability, and progressive and non- progressive motility decreased significantly in the CIS group compared to the control group but the percentage of abnormal sperm morphology increased (P<0.05, Table 3). By contrast, administration of AL gel along with CIS could significantly improve
the sperm parameters compared to the CIS group (P<0.05,
Table 3). Also, treatment of CIS rats by MET significantly
increased sperm concentration, viability and progressive
motility and reduced abnormal morphology of sperm compared to the CIS group (P<0.05). Non- progressive motility
increased in the CIS-MET group, but this change was not
significant compared to the CIS group (Table 3).
Table 3
Comparison of sperm parameters in different groups
Groups Sperm parameters
Control
CIS
AL
MET
CIS-AL
CIS-MET
Viability (%)
86.26 ± 13.44
30.00 ± 11.33a
91.94 ± 11.41b
87.00 ± 16.00b
77.53 ± 13.66b
67.33 ± 9.01b
Concentration (106/mL)
120.55 ± 9.44
55.00 ± 7.12a
127.50 ± 10.68b
128.75 ± 8.75b
98.81 ± 13.68b
79.75 ± 12.28ab
Progressive motility (%)
78.17 ± 7.45
11.88 ± 4.16a
81.16 ± 7.56b
79.69 ± 3.59b
64.77 ± 11.78b
52.89 ± 17.18ab
Non- progressive motility (%)
5.76 ± 2.61
15.29 ± 3.90a
5.94 ± 3.16b
4.58 ± 1.39b
7.52 ± 3.72b
9.44 ± 3.77
Immotile sperm (%)
16.07 ± 4.99
72.83 ± 5.51a
12.90 ± 4.71b
15.73 ± 2.20b
27.71 ± 8.30b
37.67 ± 13.59ab
Abnormal sperm (%)
8.52 ± 2.40
33.93 ± 3.18a
9.65 ± 6.76b
11.56 ± 7.38b
18.67 ± 4.82b
21.64 ± 2.56ab
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different superscripts are significantly
different: a ; Significant change from the control group at
P<0.05, b; Significant change from the CIS group at
P<0.05, Control; Control group, CIS; Cisplatin (5 mg/kg), AL; A.
vera (400 mg/kg), and MET; Metformin (200 mg/kg).
No significant differences were observed in the sperm
parameters between the AL and MET groups and the control group (Table 3).
Discussion
CIS-based chemotherapy induces gonadal toxicity
and infertility by increasing oxidative stress (5, 6).
Hence, administration of antioxidant agents may be a
useful strategy in reducing CIS toxicity and preserve the
fertilization capacity of patients receiving CIS.The results of the present study showed that CIS
decreased relative weight and dimensions of the testis,
and reduced the germinal epithelium thickness, and
the diameter of seminiferous tubules. Additionally,
histopathological changes such as testicular atrophy,
desquamation, vacuolation of germinal epithelium, and
reduction of spermatogenesis activity were observed in
CIS-treated rats.Loss of testicular weight and dimension in CIS-treated
rats could be due to the inhibition of spermatogenesis,
atrophy of testicular tubules, reduction of spermatogenic
cells, and other degenerative alterations caused by CIS
(25). These histological damages may be explained by
disruptions of the redox balance induced by CIS which
result in DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and inhibition
of protein synthesis (4). Testis tissue is highly vulnerable
to oxidative stress because it has a high metabolic
activity and considerable amount of highly unsaturated fatty acids (26). Free radicals impair different parts of
the testis especially testicular germinal cells and lead
to atrophy in testicular tubules and reduction of sperm
generation (20, 26, 27).Data from the present study likely showed that CIS
treatment impairs oxidant-antioxidant balance in
testicular tissue so that it increased the levels of MDA
and decreased antioxidant enzymes (SOD and GPx)
activities, these results are in agreement with previous
reports (27, 28). The peroxidation of lipids is one of the
toxic effects of CIS in the testis and MDA is produced
as the end-product of this process; thus, MDA content is
the best marker for measuring oxidative stress and lipid
peroxidation indirectly. Also, the increase in the MDA
level may be related to DNA fragmentation as reported
previously (29). The reductions of the antioxidant
enzymes activities observed in this study, are probably
due to either direct effects of CIS on these enzymes
or enhanced consumption of antioxidant enzymes for
detoxifying free radicals generated by CIS (30).We found a CIS-mediated decrease in serum
testosterone concentration which is fundamentally
consistent with previous studies (27, 29). Saral et al.
(27) reported that the reduction of testosterone level
induced by CIS results from a decrease in the number
of Leydig cells or their dysfunction. Another hypothesis
is that CIS inhibits testosterone synthesis by depressing
the cytochrome P‐450‐dependent 17‐α‐hydroxylase
level and decreasing the numbers of luteinizing hormone
(LH) receptors in Leydig cells.CIS treatment reduced sperm concentration, motility
and viability and increased abnormal sperm morphology,
consistent with many reports that have indicated the side
effects of CIS on sperm function (20, 28). The alteration
in sperm parameters of the CIS group was probably
caused by prolonged exposure of the testis to CIS-induced free radicals (20). Free radicals decrease the
mitochondrial membrane potential in sperm cells which
is associated with a decrease in adenosine triphosphate
(ATP) production and inhibition of sperm motility (31).
In addition, damage of the sperm cell membrane by CIS-induced free radicals may be the cause for the decrease
in sperm viability and motility and the increase in the
morphological defects (32).In the present study, administration of AL gel at a
dose of 400 mg/kg effectively inhibited the CIS-induced
testicular oxidative stress by decreasing the MDA levels
and increasing the antioxidant enzymes activities. Also,
our results clearly showed that AL treatment attenuated
adverse effects of CIS on relative testicular weight and
dimension, sperm parameters, testosterone level, and
histological changes of the testis.These chemoprotective effects of AL a gainst CIS-induced toxicity may be related to the antioxidant
effect of AL, as reported in previous studies (33, 34).
Imaga et al. (33) reported that AL gel improves CIS-induced oxidative damages in the kidney and liver
of experimental animals. Also, Chatterjee et al. (34)
indicated that administration of AL along with CIS was
associated with amelioration of antioxidant defense
system and diminution of CIS-induced nephrotoxicity.AL and especially its gel are highly spermatogenic and
enhance male fertility by elevating sperm quality (10,
11). AL increases spermatogenesis process via affecting
spermatogenic cells and stimulating cell division, and
increases testosterone hormone by stimulating Leydig
cells (10, 11, 35).Estakhr and Javdan (10) reported that AL significantly
increased testicular weight, testosterone hormone, and
sperm concentration and motility and decreased sperm
abnormalities. Also, AL increases cAMP responsive
element modulator (CREM) gene expression that has a
key role in the regulation of the expression of genes that
control spermatogenesis (11).AL contains a large number of antioxidant compounds
including vitamins (A, C, B, E), flavonoids, phenolic
compounds, and polysaccharides (7). Vitamin E has the
highest antioxidant activity and plays a key role in the
protection of plasma membrane against peroxidation
by free radicals. Also, vitamin E improves testicular
weight, germinal epithelium thickness, and diameter
size of seminiferous tubule (36). Vitamin C in AL
gel performs an important role in the integrity and
fertility of semen and makes up to 65% of the total
antioxidant capacity of seminal plasma. Also, vitamin C
inhibits sperm agglutination and increases testosterone
concentration (37). Furthermore, phenolic compounds
and polysaccharides of AL have antioxidant capacity
and prevent diseases induced by oxidative stress (38).
Therefore, because of its antioxidant properties, AL
can reduce CIS-induced oxidative damages in testis
tissue and can support spermatogenesis and protect
spermatozoa against free radicals.
Conclusion
Our findings demonstrated that oxidative stress can
play a significant role in the pathogenesis of CIS-induced testicular and sperm injuries. Also, biochemical,
hormonal, and histological results suggest that AL gel
could be effective for prevention of gonadal toxicity induced by CIS in male Wistar rats. This study concluded
that AL gel due to its potent antioxidant effect, can protect
the testicular tissue from toxic damages caused by CIS.
Authors: Stephen Ferrière; Ivan Peyron; Olivier D Christophe; Charlotte Kawecki; Caterina Casari; Vincent Muczynski; Amit Nathwani; Alexandre Kauskot; Peter J Lenting; Cécile V Denis Journal: Blood Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 22.113