Literature DB >> 34154984

Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Inclusive of All Women at Average Risk: Update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging.

Debra L Monticciolo1, Sharp F Malak2, Sarah M Friedewald3, Peter R Eby4, Mary S Newell5, Linda Moy6, Stamatia Destounis7, Jessica W T Leung8, R Edward Hendrick9, Dana Smetherman10.   

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most common nonskin cancer, the second leading cause of cancer deaths, and the leading cause of premature death in US women. Mammography screening has been proven effective in reducing breast cancer deaths in women age 40 years and older. A mortality reduction of 40% is possible with regular screening. Treatment advances cannot overcome the disadvantage of being diagnosed with an advanced-stage tumor. The ACR and Society of Breast Imaging recommend annual mammography screening beginning at age 40, which provides the greatest mortality reduction, diagnosis at earlier stage, better surgical options, and more effective chemotherapy. Annual screening results in more screening-detected tumors, tumors of smaller sizes, and fewer interval cancers than longer screening intervals. Screened women in their 40s are more likely to have early-stage disease, negative lymph nodes, and smaller tumors than unscreened women. Delaying screening until age 45 or 50 will result in an unnecessary loss of life to breast cancer and adversely affects minority women in particular. Screening should continue past age 74 years, without an upper age limit unless severe comorbidities limit life expectancy. Benefits of screening should be considered along with the possibilities of recall for additional imaging and benign biopsy and the less tangible risks of anxiety and overdiagnosis. Although recall and biopsy recommendations are higher with more frequent screening, so are life-years gained and breast cancer deaths averted. Women who wish to maximize benefit will choose annual screening starting at age 40 years and will not stop screening prematurely.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; breast cancer screening; early detection; mammography; mammography screening

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34154984     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  An Evidence-based and Inclusive Breast Cancer Screening Strategy: Summary of Current Guidelines from the American College of Radiology and Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Devan Diwanji; Bonnie Joe
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Christine E Edmonds; Sylvia A Reyes; Cletus Arciero; Vivian J Bea; Angelena Crown; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  10-year opportunistic mammographic screening scenario in Brazil and its impact on breast cancer early detection: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Isabela Campeti Cuoghi; Mariana Furlani da Silva Soares; Gustavo Motta Cabello Dos Santos; Francisco José Candido Dos-Reis; Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto; Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade; Priscila Longhin Bosquesi; Leonardo Fleury Orlandini; Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 7.664

4.  Screening MRI in Patients with High-Risk Breast Lesions: More May Not Necessarily be More.

Authors:  Juan C Paramo; Roshni Rao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Racial Disparities Persist in Cancer Screening: New USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Illuminate Inadequate Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Women.

Authors:  Christine E Edmonds; Samantha P Zuckerman; Carmen E Guerra
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 6.  Mobile Mammography Services and Underserved Women.

Authors:  Usha Trivedi; Toma S Omofoye; Cindy Marquez; Callie R Sullivan; Diane M Benson; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05

7.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Imaging: An Analysis of the National Mammography Database.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Cindy Lee; Robert D Rosenberg; Judy Burleson; Michael Simanowith; Tom Fruscello; Casey E Pelzl; Sarah M Friedewald; Linda Moy; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.240

Review 8.  Axillary Lymphadenopathy associated with COVID-19 vaccination: updates and recommendations.

Authors:  Sandra L Schwaner
Journal:  J Radiol Nurs       Date:  2022-08-19

9.  Patient, primary care provider, and stakeholder perspectives on mammography screening frequency: lessons learned from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Vicky Ro; Tarsha Jones; Thomas Silverman; Julia E McGuinness; Ashlee Guzman; Jacquelyn Amenta; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.638

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.