Literature DB >> 34154953

Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France: The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) study.

Guillaume Bonnet1, Orianne Weizman2, Antonin Trimaille3, Thibaut Pommier4, Joffrey Cellier5, Laura Geneste6, Vassili Panagides7, Wassima Marsou8, Antoine Deney9, Sabir Attou10, Thomas Delmotte11, Sophie Ribeyrolles12, Pascale Chemaly13, Clément Karsenty9, Gauthier Giordano14, Alexandre Gautier13, Corentin Chaumont15, Pierre Guilleminot16, Audrey Sagnard16, Julie Pastiero16, Nacim Ezzouhairi17, Benjamin Perin14, Cyril Zakine18, Thomas Levasseur19, Iris Ma5, Diane Chavignier20, Nathalie Noirclerc21, Arthur Darmon22, Marine Mevelec20, Baptiste Duceau2, Willy Sutter2, Delphine Mika23, Charles Fauvel15, Théo Pezel24, Victor Waldmann1, Ariel Cohen25.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a public health crisis. Only limited data are available on the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. AIMS: To investigate the characteristics, cardiovascular complications and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France.
METHODS: The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) study is a French nationwide study including all consecutive adults with a diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection hospitalized in 24 centres between 26 February and 20 April 2020. Patients admitted directly to intensive care were excluded. Clinical, biological and imaging parameters were systematically collected at hospital admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death.
RESULTS: Of 2878 patients included (mean±SD age 66.6±17.0 years, 57.8% men), 360 (12.5%) died in the hospital setting, of which 7 (20.7%) were transferred to intensive care before death. The majority of patients had at least one (72.6%) or two (41.6%) cardiovascular risk factors, mostly hypertension (50.8%), obesity (30.3%), dyslipidaemia (28.0%) and diabetes (23.7%). In multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.06; P<0.001), male sex (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.11-2.57; P=0.01), diabetes (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.12-2.63; P=0.01), chronic kidney failure (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02-2.41; P=0.04), elevated troponin (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11-2.49; P=0.01), elevated B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.0004-2.86; P=0.049) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥2 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.12-2.60; P=0.01) were independently associated with in-hospital death.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France, cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors were associated with a substantial morbi-mortality burden.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Caractéristiques; Cardiovascular risk factors; Characteristics; Death; Décès; Facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire; SARS-CoV-2

Year:  2021        PMID: 34154953      PMCID: PMC7923854          DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2021.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to a public health crisis of unprecedented magnitude. Up to the end of October 2020, more than 43 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported worldwide, and almost 1.15 million people had died [1], [2]. France has not been spared, with more than 1 million cases [3], [4], [5]. The classic profile of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 has been described in case series from China [6], [7], [8], the United States [9], [10], [11], Italy [12], [13] and the United Kingdom [14]. Most of these patients were overweight men with cardiovascular comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes [11], [14], [15]. Although the overall picture of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 is similar worldwide, some discrepancies persist. Conflicting data exist on the mortality rate, the proportion of patients requiring transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), and the burden of diabetes, overweight or smoking on clinical outcomes [16], [17], [18]. These data were also obtained from multiple case series from several regions around the world, with different healthcare systems [7], [11], [12], [14]. Furthermore, at the beginning of the pandemic, there were no recommendations for medical treatment, respiratory support, or continuation or discontinuation of chronic treatments, resulting in inevitable heterogeneity in both populations and medical care. To date, epidemiological data on patients with COVID-19 in France remain scarce. The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) study was therefore designed to collate data from patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a network of 24 French centres. The aim was to provide an overview of the patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France, with an emphasis on: the burden of cardiovascular comorbidities and treatments; the incidence and impact of cardiovascular complications associated with COVID-19; the outcomes of patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 (i.e. mortality rate, proportion and timing of transfer to ICU). Here we present the methodology and baseline data for the CCF study.

Methods

Study design and population

CCF is a French nationwide observational study conducted in 24 centres (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344327). Participation was offered to all types of institutions (academic hospitals, general hospitals, private clinics). The 24 participating centres comprised 14 academic hospitals, five general hospitals, three private not-for-profit clinics, and two private clinics (Table A.1). All consecutive adults admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 infection between 26 February and 20 April 2020 were included. According to World Health Organization criteria, SARS-Cov-2 infection was defined as a positive result on real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction of nasal and pharyngeal swabs or lower respiratory tract aspirates (confirmed case), or as typical imaging characteristics on chest computed tomography (CT) when laboratory testing results were inconclusive (probable case) [17]. Patients were recruited consecutively from emergency units or conventional hospital departments over a period of 8 weeks. As the aim of the study was to investigate patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in conventional hospital wards, those admitted direct to ICU were excluded. The CCF study was declared to and authorized by the French data protection committee (Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté, CNIL, authorization n°2207326v0), and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. The study was supported and organized under the supervision of the French Society of Cardiology.

Data collection

All data were collected by local investigators and entered into an electronic case-report form via REDCap software (Research Electronic Data Capture, Vanderbilt University), hosted on a secure server from the French Institute of Health and Medical Research at the Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre. Patient baseline information included demographic characteristics, coexisting medical conditions, and chronic medications. Exhaustive data, including clinical parameters, blood test results and chest CT scan characteristics (when performed), were recorded at admission. Chest CT scan results were assessed, according to European guidelines [18], by a senior radiologist at the local workstation of each centre. The degree of scanographic lesions was based on visual assessment of parenchymal involvement and was categorized as limited (< 25%), moderate (25 − 50%), or severe (> 50%). Only CT scans performed within 24 hours of admission were considered. Structural heart disease was defined as any abnormality or defect of the heart muscle or heart valves and was divided into ischaemic (coronary artery disease [CAD]-related) or other (non–CAD-related) structural heart disease. Cardiovascular complications during hospitalization were reported and included any cardiac or vascular complication during in-hospital stay (acute coronary syndrome, acute heart failure, pericarditis, myocarditis, stroke, acute organ or limb ischaemia, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis).

Outcomes

The primary outcome was in-hospital death. The secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death or ICU transfer. Data on pharmacological therapies, modes of respiratory support, complications or associated diagnoses during hospital stay were reported. All medical interventions, including pharmacological therapies to treat COVID-19, were left to the discretion of the referring medical team. The date of final follow-up for patients still hospitalized was 21 April 2020.

Statistical analysis

This report was prepared according to the STROBE checklist for observational studies [19]. Categorical data are reported as counts and percentages. Continuous data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data and as median (interquartile range [IQR]) for non-normally distributed data. Comparisons used the Chi2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test or the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test, as appropriate, for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with in-hospital death in univariate and multivariable analysis. Variables with probability values < 0.20 in univariable analyses were considered in the multivariable models, with the final selection based on the most favourable goodness-of-fit measures (Bayesian information criterion). Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted and were compared using the log-rank test. Censoring occurred in the event of loss to follow-up. A 2-tailed P  < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data were analysed using R software, version 3.6.3 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 2878 patients were included from 26 February to 20 April 2020. The mean age was 66.6 ± 17.0 years and 57.9% were men. Baseline clinical characteristics at admission are detailed in Table 1 . Median time from the beginning of symptoms until hospital admission was 7.0 (3.0 − 10.0) days.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the study population, overall and according to vital status.

VariableNOverall (N = 2878)Alive (n = 2503)Died in hospital (n = 360)P
Demographics
 Age (years)287366.6 ± 17.064.6 ± 16.780.4 ± 12.0< 0.001
 Male sex28781666 (57.9)1434 (57.3)222 (61.7)0.18
 BMI (kg/m2)249327.8 ± 6.027.9 ± 6.126.9 ± 5.80.003
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Hypertension28591453 (50.8)1186 (47.7)261 (72.9)< 0.001
 Diabetes2860677 (23.7)554 (22.3)121 (33.9)< 0.001
 Dyslipidaemia2859800 (28.0)654 (26.3)139 (38.9)< 0.001
 Smoking2810378 (13.5)325 (13.3)51 (14.7)0.29
 Heredity271344 (1.6)36 (1.52)7 (2.11)0.45
 Obesity2493756 (30.3)677 (31.0)78 (26.0)0.09
Coexisting conditions
 Peripheral artery disease2838147 (5.2)117 (4.7)30 (8.4)0.001
 Stroke2837253 (8.9)197 (8.0)54 (15.2)< 0.001
 Chronic kidney disease2836405 (14.3)282 (11.4)119 (33.9)< 0.001
 Respiratory comorbidities2878< 0.001
  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease164 (5.7)125 (5.0)36 (10.0)
  Asthma189 (6.6)170 (6.8)17 (4.7)
  Chronic respiratory failure79 (2.7)62 (2.5)17 (4.7)
 Malignancy2878< 0.001
  In remission226 (7.9)183 (7.3)43 (11.9)
  Active189 (6.6)144 (5.8)42 (11.7)
 Venous thromboembolism2878212 (7.4)174 (7.0)38 (10.6)0.01
 Previous structural heart disease2850599 (21.0)458 (18.5)136 (38.1)< 0.001
  CAD313 (11.0)237 (9.6)75 (21.0)
  Non-CAD286 (10.0)221 (8.9)61 (17.1)
 Atrial fibrillation2852416 (14.6)320 (12.9)91 (25.5)< 0.001
 Previous heart surgery2878105 (3.7)82 (3.3)21 (5.83)0.01
 Heart failure2809317 (11.3)238 (9.7)79 (22.6)< 0.001
  HFpEF161 (50.8)124 (5.0)37 (10.6)< 0.001
  HFrEF156 (49.2)114 (4.6)42 (12.0)< 0.001
Chronic medications
 Beta-blocker2878735 (25.5)585 (23.4)145 (40.3)< 0.001
 Any RAAS-inhibitor966 (33.6)806 (32.2)156 (43.3)< 0.001
  ACE inhibitor2878506 (17.6)423 (16.9)82 (22.8)0.003
  ARB2878469 (16.3)392 (15.7)74 (20.6)0.02
 Diuretic2878564 (19.6)446 (17.8)113 (31.4)< 0.001
 Antialdosterone287879 (2.7)59 (2.4)20 (5.6)0.001
 Antiplatelet2878627 (21.8)493 (19.7)131 (36.4)< 0.001
 Oral antidiabetic2878451 (15.7)374 (14.9)75 (20.8)0.004
 Statins2878653 (22.7)540 (21.6)113 (31.4)< 0.001
 Anticoagulant2878418 (14.5)325 (13.0)90 (25.0)< 0.001
  NOAC232 (8.1)184 (7.35)47 (13.1)< 0.001
  Anti-Xa100 (3.5)79 (3.2)21 (5.8)
  Anti-IIa132 (4.6)104 (4.2)27 (7.5)
 Vitamin K antagonist2878150 (5.2)112 (4.47)37 (10.3)< 0.001
 Heparin287830 (1.0)25 (1.00)4 (1.11)1.00

Data are expressed as number (%) or mean ± SD. Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; HFpEF: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; NOAC: non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; RAAS: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Clinical characteristics of the study population, overall and according to vital status. Data are expressed as number (%) or mean ± SD. Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; HFpEF: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; NOAC: non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; RAAS: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Overall, 2088 (72.6%) of patients had at least one cardiovascular risk factor, 1196 (41.6%) had two, 570 (19.9%) had three and 210 (7.3%) had four. The most common risk factors were hypertension (50.8%), obesity (30.3%), dyslipidaemia (28.0%) and diabetes (23.7%). The main cardiovascular comorbidities were atrial fibrillation (14.6%), heart failure (11.3%), and CAD (11.0%). Among 317 patients with a history of heart failure, 50.8% had a preserved ejection fraction (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%) and 49.2% had a reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%). Chronic kidney disease (14.3%) and respiratory diseases (15.0%) were the most prevalent extra-cardiac conditions.

Paraclinical features

A positive SARS-CoV2 real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction test was documented in 2596 (91.8%) patients. Biological, electrocardiogram and imaging data are presented in Table 2 . An inflammatory profile was observed, with increased blood rates of C-reactive protein (90.3 ± 77.1 mg/L), fibrinogen (6.0 ± 1.7 g/L) and D-dimer (1644 ± 3633 μg/L). A high proportion of patients had a quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) ≥ 2 (61.5%) or sepsis-induced coagulopathy score ≥ 1 (67.9%). On the CT-scan data, 80.9% of patients had mild or moderate parenchymal involvement, and 19.1% had > 50% of parenchymal involvement.
Table 2

Paraclinical features of the study population, overall and according to vital status.

VariableNOverall (N = 2878)Alive (n = 2503)Died in hospital (n = 360)P
Laboratory values
 Haemoglobin (g/dL)283513.1 ± 2.013.2 ± 1.912.7 ± 2.2< 0.001
 Leucocytes (g/L)28277.3 ± 5.17.1 ± 4.69.0 ± 7.8< 0.001
 Lymphocytes (g/L)27851.3 ± 3.51.3 ± 2.71.6 ± 6.70.07
 Platelets (g/L)2807220 ± 99223 ± 99203 ± 1010.001
 GFR (mL/min/m2)282981.6 ± 29.584.6 ± 28.161.8 ± 31.3< 0.001
 Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L)260853.7 ± 69.050.9 ± 62.572.8 ± 102< 0.001
 Total bilirubin (mg/L)242310.9 ± 13.410.6 ± 13.412.2 ± 10.20.04
 Gamma glutamyl transferase (IU/L)230192 ± 3190 ± 127106 ± 1560.04
 Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)236690 ± 11988 ± 120108 ± 1080.003
 Phosphoraemia (mmol/L)10771.0 ± 0.30.97 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.4< 0.001
 Corrected serum calcium (mmol/L)12582.4 ± 0.22.4 (0.2)2.5 (0.3)0.003
 Albumin (g/L)164231.8 ± 6.532.1 ± 6.529.8 ± 6.2< 0.001
 C-reactive protein (mg/L)275890.3 ± 77.185.7 ± 74.3121.0 ± 85.9< 0.001
 Fibrinogen (g/L)13796.0 ± 1.76.0 ± 1.76.0 ± 1.50.91
 Prothrombin rate (%)221585.0 ± 18.185.9 ± 17.678.4 ± 20.3< 0.001
 D-dimer (μg/L)11561644 ± 36331481 ± 24073025 ± 86240.051
 pH20067.5 ± 0.17.5 ± 0.17.4 ± 0.1< 0.001
 Lactates (mmol/L)17561.4 ± 1.01.4 ± 0.81.9 ± 1.6< 0.001
 Elevated BNP or NT-pro-BNPa1778943 (53.0)702 (47.2)234 (83.6)< 0.001
 Troponin elevationb1763572 (32.4)442 (28.8)127 (58.5)< 0.001
 qSOFA score ≥ 221091298 (61.5)1094 (59.8)196 (73.4)< 0.001
 Sepsis-induced coagulopathy score > 116721135 (67.9)969 (66.2)162 (80.2)< 0.001
Electrocardiogram
 Heart rate (beats/min)262486.6 ± 17.986.5 ± 17.687.8 ± 20.20.16
 Complete bundle-branch block2121164 (7.7)122 (6.5)42 (17.4)< 0.001
 Non-sinus rhythm2312260 (11.2)196 (9.7)64 (23.3)< 0.001
 Corrected QT-segment (ms)1162435 ± 51433 ± 50458 ± 55< 0.001
Chest computed tomography
 Parenchymal involvement2247< 0.001
  Mild (< 30)953 (42.4)874 (43.9)77 (31.2)
  Moderate (30 − 50)864 (38.5)764 (38.4)96 (38.9)
  Severe (> 50)430 (19.1)353 (17.7)74 (30.0)

Data are expressed as number (%) or mean ± SD. Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; NT − pro-BNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; qSOFA: quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL.

Above each centre threshold.

Paraclinical features of the study population, overall and according to vital status. Data are expressed as number (%) or mean ± SD. Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; NT − pro-BNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; qSOFA: quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL. Above each centre threshold. Cardiac biomarkers were increased (B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] > 50 pg/mL or NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL) in 53.0% of patients and troponin level was increased (above each centre threshold) in 32.4%. Of the 2878 patients included, 360 (12.5%) died in the hospital setting, of which 74 (20.6%) were transferred to ICU before death (Fig. 1 ). Median delay before transfer to ICU was 2 (IQR 1 − 4) days and before death without transfer to ICU was 6.5 (IQR 3 − 10) days. Mechanical ventilation was used in 370 (12.9%) patients, non-invasive ventilation support in 81 (2.8%) and high-flow oxygen therapy in 153 (5.3%). Median length of hospitalization among the 1991 patients discharged alive was 8 (IQR 5 − 12) days. As of 21 April 2020, of the 2503 patients still alive, 513 (20.5%) were still hospitalized, including 264 initially transferred to ICU and 249 patients not admitted to ICU.
Figure 1

Study flow chart. ICU: intensive care unit.

Study flow chart. ICU: intensive care unit. Pharmacological treatments for COVID-19 included antibiotics in 2142 (74.4%) patients, hydroxychloroquine in 499 (17.3%), antiretrovirals in 378 (13.1%), corticosteroids in 214 (7.4%), immunomodulatory drugs in 33 (1.1%), recombinant interferon in 13 (0.5%) and immunoglobulin therapy in 2 (0.1%).

Risk factors associated with the primary outcome

Factors associated with in-hospital death in univariable analysis are reported in Table 3 . Among cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors, hypertension (P  < 0.001), diabetes (P  < 0.001), dyslipidaemia (P  < 0.001), heart failure (P  < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (P  < 0.001) and history of structural heart disease (P  < 0.001 for CAD and P  < 0.001 for non-CAD) were associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital death. The impact of main cardiovascular comorbidities is shown in Fig. 2 .
Table 3

Cox univariate analysis.

VariableAlive (n = 2503)Died in hospital (n = 360)HR (95% CI)P
Demographics
 Age (years)64.6 ± 16.780.4 ± 12.01.07 (1.06 − 1.08)< 0.001
 Male sex1434 (57.3)222 (61.7)1.16 (0.94 − 1.43)0.18
 BMI (mean ± SD)27.9 (6.1)27.0 (5.8)0.97 (0.95 − 0.99)0.003
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Hypertension1186 (47.7)261 (72.9)2.84 (2.25 − 3.59)< 0.001
 Diabetes554 (22.3)121 (33.9)1.75 (1.41 − 2.18)< 0.001
 Dyslipidaemia654 (26.3)139 (38.9)1.73 (1.40 − 2.14)< 0.001
 Smoking325 (13.3)51 (14.7)1.17 (0.87 − 1.58)0.29
 Obese677 (31.0)78 (26.0)0.80 (0.62 − 1.04)0.09
 Chronic kidney disease282 (11.4)119 (33.9)3.55 (2.84 − 4.43)< 0.001
 Chronic respiratory failure62 (2.5)17 (4.7)1.90 (1.16 − 3.09)0.009
 Peripheral artery disease117 (4.7)30 (8.4)1.90 (1.31 − 2.77)0.001
 Stroke197 (8.0)54 (15.2)1.96 (1.47 − 2.62)< 0.001
 Venous thromboembolism174 (7.0)38 (10.6)1.55 (1.11 − 2.18)0.01
Previous structural heart disease< 0.001
 None2020 (81.5)221 (61.9)Referent
 CAD237 (9.6)75 (21.0)2.68 (2.06 − 3.48)< 0.001
 Non-CAD221 (8.9)61 (17.1)2.42 (1.83 − 3.22)< 0.001
 Heart failure238 (9.7)79 (22.6)2.53 (1.97 − 3.25)< 0.001
 HFpEF124 (5.1)37 (10.6)2.09 (1.48 − 2.94)< 0.001
 HFrEF114 (4.6)42 (12.0)2.60 (1.88 − 3.59)< 0.001
 Atrial fibrillation320 (12.9)91 (25.5)2.26 (1.78 − 2.87)< 0.001
Treatments
 Beta-blocker423 (16.9)82 (22.8)1.44 (1.13 − 1.84)0.003
 Any RAAS-inhibitor806 (32.2)156 (43.3)1.58 (1.28 − 1.94)< 0.001
 ACE inhibitor423 (16.9)82 (22.8)1.44 (1.13 − 1.84)0.003
 ARB392 (15.7)74 (20.6)1.36 (1.05 − 1.76)0.002
Biomarkers
 Elevated BNP or NT − pro-BNPa702 (47.2)234 (83.6)5.30 (3.86 − 7.27)< 0.001
 Troponin elevationb442 (28.8)127 (58.5)3.23 (2.46 − 4.24)< 0.001
qSOFA score ≥ 2c1094 (59.8)196 (73.4)1.81 (1.38 − 2.38)< 0.001

Data are expressed as number (%) unless otherwise specified. Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI: body mass index; BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; CAD: coronary artery disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HFpEF: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; NT − pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.

BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL.

Above each centre threshold.

Initial severity score.

Figure 2

Impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. ICU: intensive care unit.

Cox univariate analysis. Data are expressed as number (%) unless otherwise specified. Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI: body mass index; BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; CAD: coronary artery disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HFpEF: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; NT − pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL. Above each centre threshold. Initial severity score. Impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. ICU: intensive care unit. After adjustment for heart failure status, elevated BNP or NT − pro-BNP levels were independently associated with in-hospital death (HR 5.01, 95% CI 3.61 − 6.95; P  < 0.001). After adjustment for heart failure and CAD, troponin elevation remained associated with in-hospital death (HR 2.86, 95% CI 2.15 − 3.81; P  < 0.001). Considering the contribution of two combined markers (qSOFA and troponin or BNP/NT − pro-BNP) to refine the prognosis, the addition of two abnormal markers was significantly associated with a poor outcome (Fig. 3 ).
Figure 3

Survival according to (A) qSOFA and BNP or NT-pro-BNP elevation; or (B) qSOFA and troponin elevation. qSOFA positive was defined as a score ≥ 2. Elevated troponin was defined as that above each centre threshold. Elevated cardiac biomarkers were BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT − pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL. BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; NT − pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; qSOFA, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Survival according to (A) qSOFA and BNP or NT-pro-BNP elevation; or (B) qSOFA and troponin elevation. qSOFA positive was defined as a score ≥ 2. Elevated troponin was defined as that above each centre threshold. Elevated cardiac biomarkers were BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT − pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL. BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; NT − pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; qSOFA, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. In multivariable analysis, age (P  < 0.001), male sex (P  = 0.005), diabetes (P  = 0.009), chronic kidney failure (P  < 0.001) and heart failure (P  = 0.04) were independently associated with in-hospital death (Table 4 ). After including cardiac biomarkers and clinical severity (qSOFA ≥ 2 at admission) in the model, age (P  < 0.001), male sex (P  = 0.01), diabetes (P  = 0.01), chronic kidney failure (P  = 0.04), elevated troponin (P  = 0.01), elevated BNP or NT − pro-BNP (P  = 0.049) and positive qSOFA score (P  = 0.01) remained independently associated with in-hospital death.
Table 4

Cox multivariable analysis.

VariableModel 1: baseline coexisting conditions
Model 2: baseline coexisting conditions, cardiac biomarker elevation and clinical severity
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
Age per 1-year increase1.07 (1.06 − 1.08)< 0.0011.05 (1.03 − 1.06)< 0.001
Male sex1.45 (1.12 − 1.86)0.0051.69 (1.11 − 2.57)0.01
Obese1.16 (0.87 − 1.55)0.321.05 (0.67 − 1.65)0.83
Hypertension1.00 (0.74 − 1.36)0.990.94 (0.58 − 1.54)0.82
Diabetes1.44 (1.09 − 1.89)0.0091.72 (1.12 − 2.63)0.01
Dyslipidaemia1.12 (0.86 − 1.46)0.411.10 (0.73 − 1.66)0.65
Chronic kidney failure1.61 (1.22 − 2.11)< 0.0011.57 (1.02 − 2.41)0.04
Chronic respiratory failure1.31 (0.75 − 2.29)0.351.64 (0.74 − 3.62)0.22
Coronary artery disease1.02 (0.74 − 1.40)0.900.76 (0.47 − 1.23)0.26
Chronic heart failure1.37 (1.01 − 1.84)0.041.21 (0.76 − 1.92)0.43
Previous stroke0.94 (0.67 − 1.31)0.700.77 (0.45 − 1.31)0.33
Elevated troponina1.66 (1.11 − 2.49)0.01
Elevated BNP or NT − pro-BNPb1.69 (1.00 − 2.86)0.049
qSOFA ≥ 21.71 (1.12 − 2.60)0.01

BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; NT − pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; qSOFA: quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Above each centre threshold.

BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT − pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL.

Cox multivariable analysis. BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; NT − pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; qSOFA: quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Above each centre threshold. BNP > 50 pg/mL or NT − pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL.

Cardiovascular complications

The rate of cardiovascular complications was higher among the 360 patients who died in hospital compared with patients still alive (26.9% vs. 16.9%, P  < 0.001) (Table 5 ). Of those who died, 15.6% (n  = 56) had an acute decompensation of heart failure (at admission or during hospitalization). Myocarditis (P  = 0.007) and stroke (P  = 0.001) were more prevalent among patients who died.
Table 5

Comparison of cardiovascular complications according to vital status.

ComplicationVital status
PTransfer to ICU or in-hospital death
P
Alive (n = 2503)Died in hospital (n = 360)No (n = 2034)Yes (n = 835)
De novo left ventricular dysfunction16 (0.7)6 (1.8)0.00513 (0.7)9 (1.4)0.11
Any cardiovascular complication423 (16.9)97 (26.9)< 0.001310 (15.2)210 (25.1)< 0.001
Acute coronary syndrome27 (1.1)9 (2.5)0.0224 (1.2)11 (1.3)0.82
Acute heart failure129 (5.2)56 (15.6)< 0.00198 (4.8)86 (10.3)< 0.001
Pericarditis16 (0.6)3 (0.8)0.5814 (0.7)5 (0.6)0.93
Myocarditis15 (0.6)7 (1.9)0.00711 (0.5)11 (1.3)0.04
Stroke14 (0.6)8 (2.2)0.0019 (0.4)13 (1.6)0.004
Acute organ or limb ischaemia10 (0.4)5 (1.4)0.017 (0.3)8 (1.0)0.03
Pulmonary embolism94 (3.7)9 (2.5)0.6462 (3.1)44 (5.3)< 0.001
Deep vein thrombosis33 (1.3)3 (0.8)0.3914 (0.7)23 (2.8)< 0.001
Other99 (4.0)14 (3.9)0.7377 (3.8)36 (4.3)0.62

Data are expressed as number (%). Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. ICU: intensive care unit.

Comparison of cardiovascular complications according to vital status. Data are expressed as number (%). Fifteen patients with unknown final status were excluded from the analysis. ICU: intensive care unit.

Discussion

This is, to our knowledge, the first cohort study to provide comprehensive insights into patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. More than three of four patients had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Advancing patient age, male sex, and history of diabetes, chronic kidney failure or chronic heart failure were independently associated with risk of in-hospital death. Elevation of cardiac biomarkers was also associated with risk of death. Cardiovascular complications during hospitalization contributed significantly to in-hospital death. Our population of 2878 hospitalized patients was predominantly male and aged over 60 years, consistent with previous studies showing a greater percentage of male versus female patients [7], [11], [14]. Reports show that the proportion of men is even higher among those hospitalized direct to the ICU for COVID-19 [12], [15]. In our study, the rate of patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor is high, due mainly to a high prevalence of hypertension, whereas CAD and heart failure were less prevalent. This is consistent with previous studies among American or European patients hospitalized for COVID-19, which reported more than half of patients with hypertension and one-third with any cardiovascular comorbidity [7], [11], [14], [19]. Initially, it was suspected that patients taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors may be at increased risk of SARS-CoV2 infection. This hypothesis was based on the frequent coexistence of a cardiovascular context in patients infected with SARS-CoV2 and on the pathophysiological role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 molecules in binding the virus to infect the cell [20]. However, there is growing evidence to show that renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are not harmful in COVID-19 [21]. Indeed, the severity of the disease is rather related to a heavy cardiovascular load than to the drugs used to treat it [22], [23]. In addition, we found no correlation between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and in-hospital death after adjustment for hypertension and heart failure [21]. The death rate was estimated to be around 12.5% among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in our study. This mortality rate is slightly lower than that reported in other studies, which ranged from 20% to 25% [11], [14], [24]. This discrepancy could be explained by the exclusion of patients admitted direct to ICU, whereas several previous studies included all consecutive patients admitted to hospital, regardless of their initial severity, leading to a high mortality rate. Another explanation might be the inclusion of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the same period at all centres. However, we reported that almost 20% of patients were transferred to ICU for respiratory support, which is higher than that for cohorts of patients hospitalized in a conventional ward [11]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the severity of the patients in this cohort is similar to that in another French study [25]. COVID-19 can cause cardiovascular complications such as myopericarditis, pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome. Even if these complications remain infrequent, as shown in our sample, they are associated with a poor prognosis [26], [27]. In parallel, we noted that elevated BNP/NT-pro-BNP or troponin was associated with in-hospital death, even in patients free of a history of CAD or heart failure. This finding might be related to subclinical myocardial damage caused by SARS-CoV2 [28]. Indeed, myocardial injury has been described as common among patients with COVID-19 and is associated with severe or fatal forms [28]. The main hypothesis that underlies this is the binding of SARS-CoV2 virus to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor to infect the cell [20]. More than 7% of myocardial cells express angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, which could explain how the SARS-CoV2 virus enters cardiomyocytes and causes direct cardiotoxicity [20], [22], [26]. Furthermore, cardiovascular tropism of SARS-CoV2 could even be more intense in patients with heart failure or diabetes. Among these patients, upregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 has been described, leading to an increased rate of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors and thus a greater propensity to become infected with SARS-CoV2 [29]. We acknowledge some limitations. First, we report a small proportion of the total number of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France, included in several areas with, at this time, no recommendations regarding in-hospital management. This may lead to slight heterogeneity in the study population; however, this is inherent to the study of infectious diseases. Second, this study, even if multicentre, describes the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized in France. Caution must be exercised in generalizing these results to other regions or countries. Third, we cannot exclude the possibility of changes in the characteristics of infected patients in a second wave. There may be future mutations in the SARS-CoV2 virus that will alter its infectious characteristics and thus the affected population [30]. Therefore, the information acquired in the first wave should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusions

In this multicentre cohort study, we provide insights into the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in France. Cardiovascular comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors carry a substantial morbi-mortality burden in this population. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who have cardiovascular disease must be closely monitored as they are at increased risk of in-hospital death.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular manifestations secondary to COVID-19: A narrative review.

Authors:  C Fauvel; A Trimaille; O Weizman; T Pezel; D Mika; V Waldmann; A Cohen; G Bonnet
Journal:  Respir Med Res       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Predictive risk factors for hospitalization and response to colchicine in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Tardif; Mariève Cossette; Marie-Claude Guertin; Nadia Bouabdallaoui; Marie-Pierre Dubé; Guy Boivin
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 12.074

Review 3.  Cardiovascular System during SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Maciej Koźlik; Adrianna Błahuszewska; Maciej Kaźmierski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The Vicissitude of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Order During COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan - A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Naomi Morishita; Kentaro Iwata
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-04-11

5.  Immune-inflammatory biomarkers and the risk of cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients with diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yi Bo; Cai Yuli; Wang Ye; Li Junfeng; Chen Xiaolin; Bao Yan; Wen Zhongyuan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 8.949

6.  Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: a not "mechanical" preventive and therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Benoit Lattuca; Guillaume Cayla
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.005

7.  Cardiovascular Characteristics and Outcomes of Young Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Antonin Trimaille; Sophie Ribeyrolles; Charles Fauvel; Corentin Chaumont; Orianne Weizman; Thibaut Pommier; Joffrey Cellier; Laura Geneste; Vassili Panagides; Wassima Marsou; Antoine Deney; Sabir Attou; Thomas Delmotte; Pascale Chemaly; Clément Karsenty; Gauthier Giordano; Alexandre Gautier; Pierre Guilleminot; Audrey Sagnard; Julie Pastier; Baptiste Duceau; Willy Sutter; Victor Waldmann; Théo Pezel; Delphine Mika; Ariel Cohen; Guillaume Bonnet
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 8.  The association between stroke and COVID-19-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on adjusted effect estimates.

Authors:  Shuwen Li; Jiahao Ren; Hongjie Hou; Xueya Han; Jie Xu; Guangcai Duan; Yadong Wang; Haiyan Yang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.307

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.