Literature DB >> 34154816

How to choose the suitable FNS specification in young patients with femoral neck fracture: A finite element analysis.

Zhirong Fan1, Yongquan Huang2, Haitao Su3, Tao Jiang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consensus regarding the optimal approach for the treatment of femoral neck fractures remains lacking. A new internal fixation femoral neck system (FNS) was developed and used in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the biomechanical outcomes of different types of FNS in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.
METHOD: In this study, we constructed three different types of unstable femoral neck fractures of Pauwels classification with angles of 50°, 60°, and 70°. We set up four test groups, namely, the one-hole plated FNS group, two-hole plated FNS group, inverted cannulated screw group and triangle cannulated screw group. Under 2100 N axial loads, displacements and the von Mises stress of the femur and internal fixation components were measured for each fracture group.
RESULTS: When the Pauwels angle was 50°or 60°, the one-hole locking plated FNS was as superior as the two-hole plated FNS in terms of femur and internal fixation displacement, and the inverted cannulated screw had slightly better stability than the triangular cannulated screw. However, when the angle increases to 70°, the two-hole locking plate has the minimum displacement, followed by the triangular cannulated screw and inverted cannulated screw, which is the worst displacement for the single-hole locking plate. Regardless of the angle, the two sets of FNS have higher internal fixation stress than the two sets of cannulated screws, which is approximately 1.6-3.0 times that of the cannulated screw group.
CONCLUSION: From the perspective of biomechanics, we suggest that when the angle of the fracture line is less than 60°, both single-hole locking plated or double-hole locking plated FNS can be used to treat unstable femoral neck fractures. However, when the angle of the fracture line is greater than 70°, we recommend using a double-hole locking plated FNS. This result needs further verification in further clinical studies.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cannulated screw; FEA; Femoral neck fracture; Femoral neck system; Finite element analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34154816     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  4 in total

1.  Is new always better: comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Konrad Schuetze; Jakob Burkhardt; Carlos Pankratz; Alexander Eickhoff; Alexander Boehringer; Christina Degenhart; Florian Gebhard; Raffael Cintean
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  Yunfeng Tang; Zhen Zhang; Limin Wang; Wei Xiong; Qian Fang; Guanglin Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Complex proximal femoral fracture in a young patient followed up for 3 years: A case report.

Authors:  Zi-Yu Li; Wen-Dan Cheng; Lei Qi; Shui-Sheng Yu; Jue-Hua Jing
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Neck of femur fractures treated with the femoral neck system: outcomes of one hundred and two patients and literature review.

Authors:  Amit Davidson; Shlomo Blum; Elad Harats; Erick Kachko; Ahmad Essa; Ram Efraty; Amos Peyser; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.479

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.