Literature DB >> 34153818

Variation in self-identified most stressful life event by outcome of previous pregnancy in a population-based sample interviewed 6-36 months following delivery.

Kaitlyn K Stanhope1, Jeff R Temple2, Carla Bann3, Corette B Parker4, Donald Dudley5, Carol J R Hogue6.   

Abstract

The majority of health research uses a deductive approach to measure stressful life events, despite evidence that perception of what is stressful varies. The goal of this project was to 1) describe the distribution of self-identified most stressful life events in a cohort of women who experienced a perinatal loss (stillbirth or neonatal death) or live birth in the previous three years and 2) test how childhood adversity influences participant selection of their most stressful life event. We used data from 987 women (282 with stillbirth, 657 without loss, and 48 with a neonatal death in the first 28 days) in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network - OASIS (Outcomes after Study Index Stillbirth) follow-up study, a population-based sample set in five U.S. states in 2009. We applied an inductive coding process to open-ended responses to a question about the most stressful event or major crisis that participants had ever experienced, resulting in a set of 15 categories. We compare psychologic wellbeing across self-identified most stressful life event, accounting for sampling and loss-to-follow-up weights. Overall, stillbirth was most commonly identified as the most stressful event (18.3% [95% CI: 15.6, 21.5]), followed by loss by death of someone other than a child (17.25% [95% CI: 13.9, 20.3]). For participants who experienced a perinatal loss, we fit multivariable logistic regression models to quantify the association between report of childhood maltreatment and identifying the perinatal loss as the most stressful life event, calculating risk ratios (RRs). Reporting any moderate or severe childhood maltreatment was associated with 24% lower risk of identifying the perinatal loss as the most stressful life event (adjusted RR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.58, 1.01]), after adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and education. These results demonstrate the value of combining standardized measures with open-ended, inductive approaches to measuring stress in large, population-based studies.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Measurement; Motherhood; Pregnancy; Stillbirth; Stress

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34153818      PMCID: PMC8312027          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   5.379


  48 in total

Review 1.  Positive change following trauma and adversity: a review.

Authors:  P Alex Linley; Stephen Joseph
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2004-02

Review 2.  Resilience to loss and potential trauma.

Authors:  George A Bonanno; Maren Westphal; Anthony D Mancini
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 18.561

3.  Measuring lifetime stress exposure and protective factors in life course research on racial inequality and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer Malat; Farrah Jacquez; George M Slavich
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.493

4.  Grief intensity, psychological well-being, and the intimate partner relationship in the subsequent pregnancy after a perinatal loss.

Authors:  Mariann H Hutti; Debora S Armstrong; Joh A Myers; Lynn A Hall
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science.

Authors:  Elissa S Epel; Alexandra D Crosswell; Stefanie E Mayer; Aric A Prather; George M Slavich; Eli Puterman; Wendy Berry Mendes
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Perinatal promotive and protective factors for women with histories of childhood abuse and neglect.

Authors:  Victoria M Atzl; Leah A Grande; Elysia Poggi Davis; Angela J Narayan
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2019-03-02

7.  Moving beyond the pain: women's responses to the perinatal period after childhood sexual abuse.

Authors:  Cyndi Gale Roller
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 8.  The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen Hughes; Mark A Bellis; Katherine A Hardcastle; Dinesh Sethi; Alexander Butchart; Christopher Mikton; Lisa Jones; Michael P Dunne
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-07-31

9.  The prevalence of common mental disorders among hospital physicians and their association with self-reported work ability: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Martijn M Ruitenburg; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Judith K Sluiter
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation.

Authors:  George M Slavich; Grant S Shields
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.