| Literature DB >> 34153718 |
Hiroki Osumi1, Loredana Vecchione2, Ulrich Keilholz3, Claudia Vollbrecht4, Annabel H S Alig5, Jobst C von Einem5, Arndt Stahler5, Jana K Striefler6, Annika Kurreck6, Andreas Kind6, Dominik P Modest6, Sebastian Stintzing5, Ivan Jelas7.
Abstract
Upfront KRAS and NRAS gene testing ('RAS') is the standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), to guide first-line treatment. The presence of RAS mutation (MT) is a negative predictor for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies and the use of cetuximab and panitumumab is restricted to RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC. Conversion from RAS WT to RAS MT mCRC after treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies is a known and well-described acquired resistance mechanism. The by far less frequent 'NeoRAS wild-type' phenomenon (reversion from RAS MT to RAS WT) has recently drawn attention. The proposed effect of chemotherapy on RAS status in mCRC patients is not fully understood. Because of the intriguing biological consequence of a RAS MT to RAS WT reversion, subsequent treatment of NeoRAS WT patients with anti-EGFR antibodies is increasingly being discussed. Here, we report three clinical cases of NeoRAS WT mCRC patients, which received standard-of-care regimens for RAS MT mCRC. Anti-EGFR antibodies were used in two out of three patients after progression of the disease. One of the patients had a long-term response. In line with our observations, NeoRAS WT phenomenon occurs in clinical practice. Retesting of RAS status during treatment should be discussed in patients with unusual long-term clinical courses of RAS MT mCRC to optimise treatment strategy and to evaluate the use of anti-EGFR antibodies.Entities:
Keywords: Cetuximab; Circulating tumour DNA; Liquid biopsy; Metastatic colorectal cancer; NeoRAS wild-type; Panitumumab; ctDNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34153718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cancer ISSN: 0959-8049 Impact factor: 9.162