Literature DB >> 34153582

Application of stacking hybrid machine learning algorithms in delineating multi-type flooding in Bangladesh.

Mahfuzur Rahman1, Ningsheng Chen2, Ahmed Elbeltagi3, Md Monirul Islam4, Mehtab Alam5, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi6, Wang Tao7, Jun Zhang5, Tian Shufeng5, Hamid Faiz5, Muhammad Aslam Baig5, Ashraf Dewan8.   

Abstract

Floods are among the most devastating natural hazards in Bangladesh. The country experiences multi-type floods (i.e., fluvial, flash, pluvial, and surge floods) every year. However, areas prone to multi-type floods have not yet been assessed on a national scale. Here, we used locally weighted linear regression (LWLR), random subspace (RSS), reduced error pruning tree (REPTree), random forest (RF), and M5P model tree algorithms in a hybrid ensemble to assess multi-type flood probabilities at a national scale in Bangladesh. We used historical flood data (1988-2020), remote sensing images (e.g., MODIS, Landsat 5-8, and Sentinel-1), and topography, hydrogeology, and environmental datasets to train and validate the proposed algorithms. According to the results, the stacking ensemble machine learning LWLR-RF algorithm performed better than the other algorithms in predicting flood probabilities, with R2 = 0.967-0.999, MAE = 0.022-0.117, RMSE = 0.029-0.148, RAE = 4.48-23.38%, and RRSE = 5.8829.69% for the training and testing datasets. Furthermore, true skill statistics (TSS: 0.929-0.967), corrected classified instances (CCI: 96.45-98.35), area under the curve (AUC: 0.983-0.997), and Gini coefficients (0.966-0.994) were computed to validate the constructed (LWLR-RF) multi-type flood probability maps. The maps constructed via the LWLR-RF algorithm revealed that the proportions of different categories of flooding areas in Bangladesh are fluvial flooding 1.50%, 5.71%, 12.66%, and 13.77% of the total land area; flash floods of 4.16%, 8.90%, 11.11%, and 5.07%; pluvial flooding: 5.72%, 3.25%, 5.07%, and 0.90%; and surge flooding, 1.69%, 1.04%, 0.52%, and 8.64% of the total land area, respectively. These percentages represent low, medium, high, and very high probabilities of flooding. The findings can guide future flood risk management and sustainable land-use planning in the study area.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extreme floods; Machine learning; National scale; Risk management; Stacking algorithm

Year:  2021        PMID: 34153582     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  2 in total

1.  Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Mohammad Azarafza; Mehdi Azarafza; Haluk Akgün; Peter M Atkinson; Reza Derakhshani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Increased flooded area and exposure in the White Volta river basin in Western Africa, identified from multi-source remote sensing data.

Authors:  Chengxiu Li; Jadunandan Dash; Moses Asamoah; Justin Sheffield; Mawuli Dzodzomenyo; Solomon Hailu Gebrechorkos; Daniela Anghileri; Jim Wright
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.