Literature DB >> 34152521

A Comparison of Recruitment Methods for a Prospective Cohort Study of Perinatal Psychoneuroimmunology among Black American Women.

Shannon L Gillespie1,2.   

Abstract

Improved understanding of perinatal psychoneuroimmunology is needed, particularly to combat the high rates of maternal and infant mortality witnessed among Black Americans. We compared the success of recruitment by advertisement, in person, or by phone during the course of a prospective cohort study of perinatal psychoneuroimmunology among Black American women. Over 24 months, 363 women were assessed and 96 were enrolled. Women recruited by phone were less likely to complete full screening than women recruited by advertisement (OR = 0.32, p < 0.01) or in person (OR = 0.19, p < 0.01). Women recruited by advertisement were less likely to complete full screening than women recruited in person (OR = 0.60, p = 0.05). Odds of unsuccessful contact were 13.2 and 11.5 times greater among women recruited by phone versus by advertisement or in person, respectively (p values ≤ 0.01). Women recruited by advertisement and in person showed similar odds of unsuccessful contact (OR = 0.87, p = 0.76). Odds of screening decline were similar following recruitment in person or by phone when contact was successful (OR = 0.85, p = 0.76). Focusing on eligible women (n = 142), those recruited in person were significantly less likely to enroll than those recruited by advertisement (OR = 0.28, p < 0.01; Fig. 4). Considering all women (n = 363), odds of enrollment did not significantly differ among the recruitment groups (p values ≥ 0.09). Most (93.8%) enrolled women consented to biological specimen banking. Findings from this brief report provide a starting point for perinatal scientists to critically consider not only how to maximize research efforts but also how research team actions may perpetuate or assuage the research mistrust introduced by long-standing social inequities.
© 2021. The New York Academy of Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obstetrics; Perinatal health; Psychoneuroimmunology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34152521      PMCID: PMC8501172          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-021-00548-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   5.801


  25 in total

1.  Births: Final Data for 2015.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll; T J Mathews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2017-01

Review 2.  Towards a More Inclusive and Dynamic Understanding of Medical Mistrust Informed by Science.

Authors:  Jessica Jaiswal; Perry N Halkitis
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.104

3.  Bariatric surgery patient perceptions and willingness to consent to resident participation.

Authors:  John M McClellan; Daniel Nelson; Christopher R Porta; Matthew Martin
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Infant Mortality by Age at Death in the United States, 2016.

Authors:  Danielle M Ely; Anne K Driscoll; T J Matthews
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2018-11

5.  Childhood stress and birth timing among African American women: Cortisol as biological mediator.

Authors:  Shannon L Gillespie; Lisa M Christian; Angela D Alston; Pamela J Salsberry
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.905

6.  Recruitment of healthy first-trimester pregnant women: lessons from the Chemicals, Health & Pregnancy study (CHirP).

Authors:  Glenys M Webster; Kay Teschke; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

Review 7.  Recruitment difficulties in obstetric trials: a case study and review.

Authors:  Arushi Madan; Sally Tracy; Rachel Reid; Amanda Henry
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.100

8.  Strategies for Successful Recruitment of Pregnant Patients Into Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Sutton; Loren E Cain; Porsha M Vallo; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  What can we learn from trial decliners about improving recruitment? Qualitative study.

Authors:  Adwoa Hughes-Morley; Bridget Young; Roelie J Hempel; Ian T Russell; Waquas Waheed; Peter Bower
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Participation of the elderly, women, and minorities in pivotal trials supporting 2011-2013 U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals.

Authors:  Nicholas S Downing; Nilay D Shah; Joseph H Neiman; Jenerius A Aminawung; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.