| Literature DB >> 34152198 |
Christine A Rygiel1, Jaclyn M Goodrich1, Maritsa Solano-González2, Adriana Mercado-García2, Howard Hu3, Martha M Téllez-Rojo2, Karen E Peterson1,4, Dana C Dolinoy1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gestational lead (Pb) exposure can adversely affect offspring health through multiple mechanisms, including epigenomic alterations via DNA methylation (5mC) and hydroxymethylation (5hmC), an intermediate in oxidative demethylation. Most current methods do not distinguish between 5mC and 5hmC, limiting insights into their individual roles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34152198 PMCID: PMC8216410 DOI: 10.1289/EHP8507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 11.035
Figure 1.Data collection timeline from the ELEMENT birth cohort in Mexico City, Mexico, between 1997–2000 and 2001–2005 for pregnancies and through adolescence into 2018. Maternal whole blood samples were collected during the first trimester (T1), second trimester (T2), and third trimester (T3) and analyzed for blood Pb concentrations. Maternal bone Pb was measured 1 month postpartum as an indicator of cumulative exposure over the course of the gestational period. Adolescent whole blood samples were collected in offspring at a follow-up visit occurring once between the ages of 11 and 18 y for Pb measures and DNA 5mC and 5hmC profiling. Covariate data including demographics and anthropometry were obtained at each stage with sample collection. Note: BLL, blood lead levels.
Characteristics of ELEMENT Mexican mother–offspring pairs with adolescent blood leukocyte DNA methylation data compared to all ELEMENT mother–infant pairs.
| Characteristics | No. | ELEMENT Subset | All ELEMENT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Min | Max | No. | Min | Max | |||||
| Mothers | ||||||||||
| Age at birth (y) | 144 | 26.5 | 14.0 | 39.0 | 1458 | 14.0 | 44.0 | 0.20 | ||
| Blood lead ( | ||||||||||
| First trimester | 127 | 5.30 | 0.90 | 35.8 | 594 | 0.00 | 36.0 | 0.34 | ||
| Second trimester | 130 | 4.40 | 0.00 | 38.2 | 616 | 0.00 | 38.0 | 0.43 | ||
| Third trimester | 131 | 4.90 | 0.00 | 34.0 | 575 | 0.00 | 38.0 | 0.29 | ||
| Average all trimesters | 133 | 5.01 | 0.43 | 33.1 | 643 | 0.00 | 33.0 | 0.41 | ||
| Bone lead ( | ||||||||||
| Patella | 140 | 9.90 | 0.11 | 48.0 | 1252 | 0.11 | 68.0 | 0.79 | ||
| Tibia | 122 | 8.28 | 0.12 | 19.0 | 1104 | 0.00 | 44.0 | 0.79 | ||
| Education (y) | 144 | 12.0 | 3.00 | 21.0 | 1212 | 0.00 | 24.0 | 0.40 | ||
| Socioeconomic status | 144 | 554 | 0.13 | |||||||
| High | 13 (9%) | 35 (6%) | ||||||||
| Medium/high | 26 (18%) | 95 (17%) | ||||||||
| Medium | 50 (35%) | 165 (30%) | ||||||||
| Low/medium | 35 (24%) | 178 (32%) | ||||||||
| Low | 6 (4%) | 23 (4%) | ||||||||
| Very low | 14 (10%) | 58 (10%) | ||||||||
| Adolescent children | ||||||||||
| Gestational age at birth (wk) | 143 | 39.0 | 36.0 | 42.0 | 1196 | 27.0 | 42.0 | 0.02 | ||
| Age at follow-up (y) | 144 | 13.7 | 11.0 | 18.0 | 549 | 10.7 | 18.1 | 0.002 | ||
| Male sex | 144 | 73 (51%) | 546 | 268 (49%) | 0.80 | |||||
| Blood Pb ( | 144 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 41.0 | 404 | 0.00 | 41.0 | 0.54 | ||
| Weight (kg) | 144 | 53.0 | 25.9 | 95.0 | 554 | 25.9 | 109.0 | 0.27 | ||
| Height for age | 144 | 546 | 3.32 | 0.43 | ||||||
| BMI for age | 144 | 0.46 | 3.40 | 546 | 3.40 | 0.95 | ||||
Note: BLL, blood lead levels; BMI, body mass index; Max, maximum; Min, minimum; SD, standard deviation; SES, socioeconomic status.
using Wilcox signed-rank test comparing entire ELEMENT cohort to the subset used in this current research. Here we are comparing their characteristics to those of all ELEMENT mother–child pairs from the same cohorts (2 and 3) with available data for each variable.
Study population (): full-term singleton live births in Mexico City, Mexico, from Cohorts 2 (1997–2000) and three (2001–2005) to mothers who have at least one measure of prenatal Pb, archived whole blood samples for DNA methylation analysis, and with nonmissing covariates (i.e., sex, adolescent BLL, and adolescent age).
ELEMENT longitudinal birth cohort (): mother–infant pairs sequentially recruited at pregnancy or delivery from maternity hospitals in Mexico City, Mexico, between 1997–2000 (Cohort 2) or 2001–2005 (Cohort 3).
The AMAI scale (Asociación Mexicana de Agencias de Investigación de Mercado) was used as an indicator of SES.
Results from three different models assessing associations between prenatal Pb biomarkers and DNA methylation. For each Pb biomarker and gene combination, the first two rows display the effect estimates for Pb and for an interaction term between the prenatal Pb biomarker and a dichotomous variable signifying whether the outcome measure is for 5mC or 5hmC; these estimates are from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures of 5hmC and 5mC at multiple CpG sites for each gene as the outcome variables. The third row is a mixed-effects model of 5mC data only; in this model outcomes are repeat measures of 5mC at each CpG site within the gene, and the effect estimate for the Pb biomarker is shown. The fourth row is a model of 5hmC measures only. All three models adjusted for the following covariates: sex, adolescent age, adolescent BLL, and batch. In a sensitivity analysis, the same models for 5mC only and 5hmC only were run with outliers of Pb exposure excluded.
| All observations | Outliers excluded | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | Beta | ||||||
| T1 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 120 | 0.05 ( | 0.58 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 120 | 0.30 (0.16, 0.45) | NA | NA | |||
| 5mC | 124 | 0.43 (0.07, 0.78) | 0.02 | 122 | 0.58 (0.01, 1.06) | 0.02 | |
| 5hmC | 120 | 0.65 | 118 | 0.79 | |||
| T2 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 123 | 0.06 ( | 0.54 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 123 | 0.28 (0.12, 0.45) | 0.001 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 127 | 0.37 (0.04, 0.69) | 0.03 | 123 | 0.41 ( | 0.16 | |
| 5hmC | 123 | 0.30 | 119 | 0.01 ( | 0.93 | ||
| T3 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 124 | 0.06 ( | 0.50 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 124 | 0.32 (0.16, 0.49) | NA | NA | |||
| 5mC | 128 | 0.50 (0.10, 0.90 | 0.01 | 127 | 0.39 ( | 0.09 | |
| 5hmC | 124 | 0.55 | 123 | 0.01 ( | 0.93 | ||
| Tibia | |||||||
| Main effect | 116 | 0.55 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 116 | 0.04 ( | 0.54 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 120 | 0.03 ( | 0.83 | 117 | 0.88 | ||
| 5hmC | 116 | 0.32 | 113 | 0.29 | |||
| Patella | |||||||
| Main effect | 133 | 0.72 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 133 | 0.13 (0.05, 0.21) | 0.001 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 137 | 0.10 ( | 0.21 | 133 | 0.12 ( | 0.25 | |
| 5hmC | 133 | 0.76 | 129 | 0.91 | |||
| T1 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 92 | 0.41 ( | 0.06 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 92 | NA | NA | ||||
| 5mC | 92 | 0.13 | 90 | 0.54 | |||
| 5hmC | 92 | 0.49 (0.17, 0.80) | 0.003 | 90 | 0.36 (0.01, 0.71) | 0.04 | |
| T2 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 93 | 0.38 (0.24, 0.52) | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 93 | NA | NA | ||||
| 5mC | 93 | 0.07 | 92 | 0.01 ( | 0.99 | ||
| 5hmC | 93 | 0.27 (0.07, 0.47) | 0.01 | 92 | 0.38 (0.03, 0.73) | 0.03 | |
| T3 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 93 | 0.46 (0.29, 0.63) | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 93 | NA | NA | ||||
| 5mC | 93 | 0.004 | 92 | 0.98 | |||
| 5hmC | 93 | 0.45 (0.21, 0.68) | 92 | 0.32 (0.03, 0.61) | 0.03 | ||
| Tibia | |||||||
| Main effect | 87 | 0.13 (0.01, 0.26) | 0.04 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 87 | 0.002 | NA | NA | |||
| 5mC | 87 | 0.74 | 85 | 0.56 | |||
| 5hmC | 87 | 0.13 ( | 0.11 | 85 | 0.11 ( | 0.27 | |
| Patella | |||||||
| Main effect | 101 | 0.20 (0.12, 0.28) | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 101 | NA | NA | ||||
| 5mC | 101 | 0.08 | 98 | 0.06 | |||
| 5hmC | 101 | 0.17 (0.07, 0.27) | 98 | 0.19 (0.07, 0.32) | 0.003 | ||
| T1 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 126 | 0.44 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 126 | 0.01 ( | 0.42 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 126 | 0.01 ( | 0.45 | 122 | 0.52 | ||
| 5hmC | 126 | 0.61 | 122 | 0.00 ( | 0.91 | ||
| T2 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 129 | 0.42 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 129 | 0.01 ( | 0.25 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 129 | 0.01 ( | 0.34 | 124 | 0.00 ( | 0.82 | |
| 5hmC | 129 | 0.63 | 124 | 0.00 ( | 0.97 | ||
| T3 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 130 | 0.00 ( | 0.90 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 130 | 0.01 ( | 0.64 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 130 | 0.01 ( | 0.42 | 129 | 0.01 ( | 0.41 | |
| 5hmC | 130 | 0.85 | 129 | 0.69 | |||
| Tibia | |||||||
| Main effect | 122 | 0.01 ( | 0.19 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 122 | 0.16 | NA | NA | |||
| 5mC | 122 | 0.00 ( | 0.83 | 119 | 0.00 ( | 0.95 | |
| 5hmC | 122 | 0.01 ( | 0.59 | 119 | 0.01 ( | 0.51 | |
| Patella | |||||||
| Main effect | 139 | 0.00 ( | 0.72 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 139 | 0.00 ( | 0.98 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 139 | 0.00 ( | 0.92 | 134 | 0.00 ( | 0.61 | |
| 5hmC | 139 | 0.00 ( | 0.70 | 134 | 0.01 ( | 0.50 | |
| T1 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 124 | 0.39 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 124 | 0.18 ( | 0.09 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 125 | 0.11 ( | 0.28 | 121 | 0.15 ( | 0.31 | |
| 5hmC | 124 | 0.88 | 120 | 0.85 | |||
| T2 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 127 | 0.58 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 127 | 0.11 ( | 0.31 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 128 | 0.04 ( | 0.72 | 123 | 0.03 ( | 0.85 | |
| 5hmC | 127 | 0.01 ( | 0.94 | 122 | 0.84 | ||
| T3 Pb | |||||||
| Main effect | 128 | 0.12 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 128 | 0.28 (0.06, 0.50) | 0.01 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 129 | 0.17 ( | 0.13 | 128 | 0.22 ( | 0.07 | |
| 5hmC | 128 | 0.50 | 127 | 0.15 | |||
| Tibia | |||||||
| Main effect | 120 | 0.04 ( | 0.38 | NA | NA | ||
| Interaction | 120 | 0.13 | NA | NA | |||
| 5mC | 121 | 0.34 | 118 | 0.38 (0.04, 0.71) | 0.03 | ||
| 5hmC | 120 | 0.05 ( | 0.40 | 117 | 0.12 ( | 0.14 | |
| Patella | |||||||
| Main effect | 137 | 0.06 | NA | NA | |||
| Interaction | 137 | 0.11 (0.03, 0.20) | 0.01 | NA | NA | ||
| 5mC | 138 | 0.05 ( | 0.26 | 133 | 0.21 ( | 0.40 | |
| 5hmC | 137 | 0.18 | 132 | 0.26 | |||
Note: BLL, blood lead levels; CI, confidence interval; NA, -int, -value for intercept effect estimates; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester. In each analysis, the outcome is percentages of 5mC or 5hmC at all quantified CpG sites treated as repeated measures, and all models adjust for sex, adolescent age, adolescent BLL, and batch. Outliers are defined as those with Pb measures greater than three standard deviations above the mean Pb concentration. NA represents the Model not run in the sensitivity analysis.
NINJ2 models were controlled for genotype at rs34038797 (G/C) and C/C samples () were dropped from the analysis.
Per change in maternal blood Pb at T1, T2, or T3, and change in maternal bone Pb measured in tibia and patella 1 month postpartum.
Estimates were derived from a mixed-effects model with an interaction term between prenatal Pb exposures and a dichotomous variable signifying whether the outcome was DNA 5mC or 5hmC. A positive value represents an increase in the slope toward greater 5mC with increasing Pb exposure, whereas a negative value represents an increase toward greater 5hmC with increasing Pb exposure.
Figure 2.Association of DNA average percent 5mC and 5hmC in adolescent human whole blood within the regions of HCN2 (A, C, and E) and NINJ2 (B, D, and F) by T1 (A and B), T2 (C and D), and T3 (E and F) maternal Pb exposure measured in whole blood. The lines represent the simple (unadjusted) relationship between trimester-specific Pb measures with adolescent 5mC or 5hmC in males and females separately. 5mC and 5hmC values for each sample are depicted as the average among all CpG sites captured within the gene region. This figure includes selected results only; numeric estimates for associations between all exposures and genes are reported using mixed-effects models treating CpG sites as repeated measures adjusting for sex, adolescent age, adolescent BLL, and batch (and genotype rs34038797 (G/C) within NINJ2 models only) and are represented in Table 2 for all children and in Table S4 for males and females. Note: T1 Pb by HCN2 5mC () and 5hmC (); T2 Pb by HCN2 5mC () and 5hmC (); T3 Pb by HCN2 5mC () and 5hmC (); T1 Pb by NINJ2 5mC () and 5hmC () without rs34038797 SNP C/C (); T2 Pb by NINJ2 5mC () and 5hmC () without rs34038797 SNP C/C (); T3 Pb by NINJ2 5mC () and 5hmC () without rs34038797 SNP C/C (). BLL, blood lead levels; Pb, lead; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester.
Figure 3.Correlations between gene expression (normalized read counts from RNA-seq) and 5mC% (left column) and 5hmC% (right column) from pyrosequencing in NINJ2 within a subset of individuals (). Regression line indicates the association between log-transformed NINJ2 expression by average 5mC or 5hmC among all CpG sites captured within the gene region of NINJ2 for each individual assessed. Note: Figure includes selected results only. Results for the other genes are reported in Figure S1.