Mingyue Qu1, Hanxu Shi1, Kai Wang1, Xinggang Wang2, Nan Yu1, Baoshi Guo1. 1. The PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, China. 2. Zibo Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases (Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College), Shandong, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple lines of evidence indicate protective effects of carotenoids in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, previous epidemiological studies reported inconsistent results regarding the associations between carotenoids levels and the risk of AD. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to evaluate the associations of six major members of carotenoids with the occurrence of AD by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ebsco, and PsycINFO databases was conducted, and the quality of each included studies was evaluated by a validated scoring systems. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined by using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated by I2 statistics. Publication bias was detected using funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, with 10,633 participants were included. Pooled analysis showed significantly lower plasma/serum levels of lutein (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.67 to -0.05, p = 0.04) and zeaxanthin (SMD = -0.59; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.06, p = 0.03) in patients with AD versus cognitively intact controls, while α-carotene (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.68 to 0.26, p = 0.39), β-carotene (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.57 to 0.65, p = 0.9), lycopene (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI: -0.96 to 0.72, p = 0.78), and β-cryptoxanthin (SMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.83 to 0.65, p = 0.81) did not achieve significant differences. CONCLUSION: Of six major members of carotenoids, only lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in plasma/serum were inversely related to the risk of AD. More high-quality longitudinal studies are needed to verify these findings.
BACKGROUND: Multiple lines of evidence indicate protective effects of carotenoids in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, previous epidemiological studies reported inconsistent results regarding the associations between carotenoids levels and the risk of AD. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to evaluate the associations of six major members of carotenoids with the occurrence of AD by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ebsco, and PsycINFO databases was conducted, and the quality of each included studies was evaluated by a validated scoring systems. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined by using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated by I2 statistics. Publication bias was detected using funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, with 10,633 participants were included. Pooled analysis showed significantly lower plasma/serum levels of lutein (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.67 to -0.05, p = 0.04) and zeaxanthin (SMD = -0.59; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.06, p = 0.03) in patients with AD versus cognitively intact controls, while α-carotene (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.68 to 0.26, p = 0.39), β-carotene (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.57 to 0.65, p = 0.9), lycopene (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI: -0.96 to 0.72, p = 0.78), and β-cryptoxanthin (SMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.83 to 0.65, p = 0.81) did not achieve significant differences. CONCLUSION: Of six major members of carotenoids, only lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in plasma/serum were inversely related to the risk of AD. More high-quality longitudinal studies are needed to verify these findings.