| Literature DB >> 34151749 |
Lijuan Chen1, Xiaoli Wu2, Weiwei Wang3, Xia Wang4, Jianhua Ma3.
Abstract
Quercetin (QN) is a naturally occurring phenolic compound found largely in vegetables and fruits. Lycopene (LY) is yet another natural phytocompound, found abundantly in red-colored fruits and vegetables. Both have been reported to have beneficial activities in humans. In this study, we document in vivo experimental model for isoproterenol (ISO) cardiac injury toxicity in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and treatment with a combined optimized concentration of quercetin and lycopene (QL). Male SD rats of different groups were treated with QL (80 mg/kg QN and 3 mg/kg LY together p.o.) for 10 days with ISO administration (100 mg/kg i.p.) on days 7 and 8. After experimental period, CK-MB, TROP, AST, ALT, LDH, GST, GPx, CAT, SOD, Vit.E, Vit. C, GSH, GSSG and MDA were estimated. SD rats administered with ISO showed an obvious rise in the serum marker enzyme levels and tissue oxidative stress markers (MDA and GSSG). Furthermore, marked reductions in the body weight and increases enzymic and non-enzymic antioxidant levels were noticed. Histological features of the heart also indicated a disruption in the cardiac myofibrils structure of ISO-intoxicated rats. Also, quantitative PCR analysis revealed an involvement of antioxidant and related pathway genes such as Nrf2, HO-1, NQO1, GSTµ, SOD1, SOD2, CAT and BCl-2 genes. QL pretreatment prevented all these adverse effects of ISO cardiotoxicity and significantly reduced the myocardial damage. Decrease in oxidative stress was observed, possibly through alterations in the expression levels of enzymic antioxidant genes (GSTµ, SOD1, SOD2 and CAT). In general, QL exert a strong protective effect through the modulations in enzymic antioxidant activity and associated molecular pathways-regulating effect in cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Keywords: Cardioprotection; isoproterenol; lycopene; phytocompounds; quercetin
Year: 2021 PMID: 34151749 PMCID: PMC8218693 DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2021.1943924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Libyan J Med ISSN: 1819-6357 Impact factor: 1.657
Effects of ISO and treatment with QL on heart weight/body weight in experimental rats
| Control | QL | ISO | QL + ISO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial BW | 185.50 ± 5.37 | 187.00 ± 5.15 | 187.25 ± 5.42 | 186.13 ± 5.51 |
| Final BW | 217.38 ± 7.27 | 220.38 ± 7.01 | 167.63 ± 4.66* | 195.50 ± 6.05# |
| Heart Wt | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 1.26 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.09* | 1.09 ± 0.08# |
| HW/BW ratio | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.04* | 0.56 ± 0.04# |
Data were of mean±SD. Results are significant when (p < 0.05) in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#).
Figure 1.(A-D): Effects of isoproterenol (ISO) and treatment with quercetin-lycopene (QL) on the marker enzymes creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Data presented were of mean±SD. Results were significant at P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#)
Figure 2.(A-C): Effects of isoproterenol (ISO) and treatment with quercetin-lycopene (QL) on myoglobin (MYO), cardiac troponin (TROP) and malondialdehyde (MDA). Data presented were of mean±SD. Results were significant at P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#)
Effects of ISO and treatment with QL on oxidative stress level in the heart of experimental rats
| Control | QL | ISO | QL + ISO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart MDA (nmol/g) | 83.13 ± 5.11 | 81.38 ± 5.32 | 132.63 ± 8.58* | 99.13 ± 6.53# |
| Heart GSSG (nmol/g) | 31.50 ± 2.98 | 32.00 ± 2.93 | 73.13 ± 3.09* | 46.38 ± 4.24# |
Data were of mean±SD. Results are significant when (p < 0.05) in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#).
Figure 3.Effects of isoproterenol (ISO) and treatment with quercetin-lycopene (QL) on the histopathological injuries. Data presented were of mean±SD. Results were significant at P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#). (Magnification: 40X)
Figure 4.Effects of isoproterenol (ISO) and treatment with quercetin-lycopene (QL) on Nrf2/HO-1 signaling gene network. Data presented were of mean±SD of triplicate measurements. Statistical significant level was calculated by ANOVA and post-hoc by DMRT analysis. Results were significant at P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#)
| Nrf2 | 5ʹ-CACATCCAGTCAGAAACCAGTGG-3’ | 5ʹ-GGAATGTCTGCGCCAAAAGCTG-3’ |
| HO-1 | 5ʹ-CCAGGCAGAGAATGCTGAGTTC-3’ | 5ʹ-AAGACTGGGCTCTCCTTGTTGC-3’ |
| BCl-2 | 5ʹ-TCGCCCTGTGGATGACTGA-3’ | 5ʹ-CAGAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCA-3’ |
| GSTµ | 5ʹ-CCACGGCCTTCCCTACTTC-3’ | 5ʹ-CTCATTTCCACGATTTCCCAG-3’ |
| SOD1 | 5ʹ-TCCGTTGCAGTCCTCGGAA-3’ | 5ʹ-TTCAGAAACTCTCTCCAACTTTGC-3’ |
| SOD2 | 5ʹ-GCCTCCCTGACCTGCCTTAC-3’ | 5ʹ-GTGATTGATATGGCCCCCG-3’ |
| CAT | 5ʹ-GCTCTTCTGGACAAGTACAATGCTG-3’ | 5ʹ-TTACACGGATGAACGCTAAGCTTC-3’ |
| NQO1 | 5ʹ-CTCGCCTCATGCGTTTTTG-3’ | 5ʹ-CCCCTAATCTGACCTCGTTCAT-3’ |
| GAPDH | 5ʹ-TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA-3’ | 5ʹ-TTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG-3’ |
Effects of ISO and treatment with QL on non-enzymic anti-oxidant levels
| Control | QL | ISO | QL + ISO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart GSH (µmol/g) | 1.48 ± 0.13 | 1.49 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.08* | 1.10 ± 0.15# |
| Serum GSH (mg/dl) | 27.29 ± 1.94 | 28.68 ± 2.40 | 17.31 ± 2.24* | 22.81 ± 1.62# |
| Serum Vit.E (µmol/L) | 14.93 ± 1.14 | 15.35 ± 0.56 | 8.81 ± 0.89* | 12.68 ± 0.96# |
| Serum Vit.C (µmol/L) | 61.39 ± 2.46 | 63.19 ± 2.11 | 48.14 ± 4.02* | 55.40 ± 3.90# |
Data were of mean±SD. Results are significant when (p < 0.05) in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#).
Effects of ISO and treatment with QL on enzymic antioxidant levels
| Control | QL | ISO | QL + ISO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (U/mg protein) | 6.33 ± 0.53 | 6.64 ± 0.45 | 3.86 ± 0.41* | 5.73 ± 0.54# |
| CAT (µmol H2O2 decomposed/min/mg protein) | 19.64 ± 1.08 | 20.90 ± 1.01 | 13.49 ± 0.85* | 16.50 ± 0.90# |
| GST (nmol CDNB conjugated/min/mg protein) | 9.25 ± 0.63 | 9.80 ± 0.58 | 6.41 ± 0.41* | 7.61 ± 0.44# |
| GPx (µmol GSH oxidized/min/mg protein) | 3.19 ± 0.36 | 3.18 ± 0.46 | 1.89 ± 0.24* | 2.68 ± 0.39# |
Data were of mean±SD. Results are significant when (p < 0.05) in comparison with control group (*) and with ISO group (#).