Literature DB >> 34151611

Rehabilitation Variability Following Femoral Condyle and Patellofemoral Microfracture Surgery of the Knee.

Stephen G Crowley1, Hasani W Swindell2, Bryan M Saltzman3, Christopher S Ahmad2, Charles A Popkin2, David P Trofa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for microfracture of femoral condyle and patellofemoral lesions of the knee.
DESIGN: Online postoperative microfracture rehabilitation protocols from US orthopedic programs and the scientific literature were reviewed. A custom scoring rubric was developed to analyze each protocol for the presence of discrete rehabilitation modalities and the timing of each intervention.
RESULTS: A total of 18 programs (11.6%) from 155 US academic orthopedic programs' published online protocols and a total of 44 protocols were analyzed. Seventeen protocols (56.7%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for femoral condyle lesions and 17 (89.5%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for patellofemoral lesions. The average time to permitting weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) was 6.1 weeks (range, 0-8) for femoral condyle lesions and 3.7 weeks (range, 0-8 weeks) for patellofemoral lesions. There was considerable variation in the inclusion and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises. For femoral condyle lesions, 10 protocols (33.3%) recommended functional testing prior to return to sport at an average of 23.3 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks). For patellofemoral lesions, 4 protocols (20.0%) recommended functional testing for return to sport at an average of 21.0 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks).
CONCLUSION: A minority of US academic orthopedic programs publish microfracture rehabilitation protocols online. Among the protocols currently available, there is significant variability in the inclusion of specific rehabilitation components and timing of many modalities. Evidence-based standardization of elements of postoperative rehabilitation may help improve patient care and subsequent outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee; microfracture; osteochondral defects; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34151611      PMCID: PMC8808894          DOI: 10.1177/19476035211025818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  65 in total

1.  Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes.

Authors:  J Richard Steadman; William G Rodkey; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Online Health Searches and Their Perceived Effects on Patients and Patient-Clinician Relationships: ASystematic Review.

Authors:  Jane Wang; Tamara Ashvetiya; Emmanuel Quaye; Kapil Parakh; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Arthroscopic microfracture of chondral defects of the knee: a comparison of two postoperative treatments.

Authors:  Richard A Marder; Gail Hopkins; Laura A Timmerman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Rehabilitation variability following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Harry M Lightsey; Margaret L Wright; David P Trofa; Charles A Popkin; Christopher S Ahmad; Lauren H Redler
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Quality and Variability of Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols From Academic Orthopaedic Surgery Programs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric C Makhni; Erica K Crump; Michael E Steinhaus; Nikhil N Verma; Christopher S Ahmad; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Biomechanics of the patello-femoral joint. Part I: A study of the contact and the congruity of the patello-femoral compartment and movement of the patella.

Authors:  K Fujikawa; B B Seedhom; V Wright
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1983-01

Review 7.  Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the United States: an analysis of a large private-payer database over a period of 8 years.

Authors:  Frank McCormick; Joshua D Harris; Geoffrey D Abrams; Rachel Frank; Anil Gupta; Kristen Hussey; Hillary Wilson; Bernard Bach; Brian Cole
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects.

Authors:  J R Steadman; W G Rodkey; J J Rodrigo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit.

Authors:  R B Salter; D F Simmonds; B W Malcolm; E J Rumble; D MacMichael; N D Clements
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Clinical Outcomes After Microfracture of the Knee: Midterm Follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander E Weber; Philip H Locker; Erik N Mayer; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Annemarie K Tilton; Brandon J Erickson; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee.

Authors:  Stephen G Crowley; Anthony Pedersen; Thomas A Fortney; Hasani W Swindell; Bryan M Saltzman; Charles A Popkin; David P Trofa
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.117

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.