| Literature DB >> 34151180 |
Daniel Ruiz-Perez1, Makella S Coudray2,3, Brett Colbert4,5, Karl Krupp6, Hansi Kumari7, Vitalii Stebliankin1, Kalai Mathee7,8, Robert L Cook9,10, Jane Schwebke11, Giri Narasimhan1,8, Purnima Madhivanan6,12,13,14.
Abstract
Vaginal dysbiosis-induced by an overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria is referred to as bacterial vaginosis (BV). The dysbiosis is associated with an increased risk for acquisition of sexually transmitted infections. Women with symptomatic BV are treated with oral metronidazole (MET), but its effectiveness remains to be elucidated. This study used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to determine the changes in the microbiota among women treated with MET. WGS was conducted on DNA obtained from 20 vaginal swabs collected at four time points over 12 months from five randomly selected African American (AA) women. The baseline visit included all women who were diagnosed with asymptomatic BV and were untreated. All subjects were tested subsequently once every 2 months and received a course of MET for each BV episode during the 12 months. The BV status was classified according to Nugent scores (NSs) of vaginal smears. The microbial and resistome profiles were analysed along with the sociodemographic metadata. Despite treatment, none of the five participants reverted to normal vaginal flora - two were consistently positive for BV, and the rest experienced episodic cases of BV. WGS analyses showed Gardnerella spp. as the most abundant organism. After treatment with MET, there was an observed decline of Lactobacillus and Prevotella species. One participant had a healthy vaginal microbiota based on NS at one follow-up time point. Resistance genes including tetM and lscA were detected. Though limited in subjects, this study shows specific microbiota changes with treatment, presence of many resistant genes in their microbiota, and recurrence and persistence of BV despite MET treatment. Thus, MET may not be an effective treatment option for asymptomatic BV, and whole metagenome sequence would better inform the choice of antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: 16s rRNA gene sequencing; Lactobacillus; bacteria; community; microbiota dysbiosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34151180 PMCID: PMC8209634 DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Access Microbiol ISSN: 2516-8290
Fig. 1.Vaginal microbial and resistome profile of five African American participants at four time points. Each column represents a specific time point for each participant beginning at baseline and followed by 4 month intervals, a total of four columns per participant ordered sequentially. Each column represents a specific time point for each participant beginning at baseline and followed by 4 month intervals, a total of four columns per participant ordered sequentially. The labels M00, M02, M08, and M12 correspond to baseline, and months four, eight, and twelve, respectively. The vaginal microbiota characterized by community state types I to IV are indicated in the x-axis. (a) Relative abundance of microbes. (b) The Nugent scores (NS) associated with the participant. The BV is indicated by red, intermediate vaginal flora by orange, and healthy vaginal microbiota by green. (c) Alpha diversity calculated using the Inverse Simpson Index. (d) Resistome profile is given as counts per million reads (CPM).
Fig. 2.Evolution of the most abundant taxa throughout the study. The boxplots show the 16 taxa whose abundance was the highest over all subjects. The different colours represent different time points. None of the changes were statistically significant due to the size of the sample.
Species determined by PCA to have maximum variance among five AA women
|
Taxa |
Principal component 1 |
|---|---|
|
|
0.796033 |
|
|
−0.529284 |
|
|
−0.231106 |
|
|
−0.172205 |
|
|
0.032557 |
|
|
0.023059 |
Fig. 3.sPLS-DA projection of the samples into the first and second principal components (PC). Treated participants are coloured in blue while untreated ones are coloured in orange. Each sample is represented by X.MYY, where X means the participant number, and YY represents the month of data collection. The treated group clusters together in a tighter way than the heterogeneous untreated group (i.e. participants at baseline).
Fig. 4.Top Spearman correlations for taxa pairs. Each interaction between a row and a column in this heatmap represents the Spearman correlation between the two taxa involved. Rows and columns are the different taxa ordered according to hierarchical clustering. For readability, only the top correlations were selected. Yellow colours indicate correlations closer to 1, while red colours imply lower correlations.
Spearman correlation between taxa and the Nugent score
|
Taxa name |
Spearman correlation |
|---|---|
|
|
−0.6347917188 |
|
|
−0.5947203609 |
|
|
−0.5345614474 |
|
|
−0.5345614474 |
|
|
0.5236533323 |
|
|
0.5041102652 s |
|
|
−0.5000000000 |
|
|
0.4949254787 |
|
|
0.4084817754 |
|
|
−0.3983923509 |