| Literature DB >> 34150983 |
Mutasem K Alsmadi1, Ibrahim Al-Marashdeh1, Malek Alzaqebah2,3, Ghaith Jaradat4, Fahad A Alghamdi1, Rami Mustafa A Mohammad5, Muneerah Alshabanah1, Daniah Alrajhi1, Hanouf Alkhaldi1, Nahier Aldhafferi5, Abdullah Alqahtani5, Usama A Badawi1, Mohammed Tayfour1.
Abstract
Following the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in China in late December 2019, more than 217 countries became almost immediately infected in the resulting pandemic. Consequently, many of them decided to close their educational institutions as a way of preventing the spread of this virus. For many of them, though, the closure made them unable to deliver learning materials to students owing to their inability to provide the right technology for the purpose. To assist with the digitalizing of learning during this time, this study reviews the most common technologies used in the delivery of learning materials, with the experience of most infected countries being considered. Major challenges in online learning are discussed in this study as well. Further, Saudi Arabia was considered as a case study for the effectiveness of distance learning during the 2020 spring semester, where 300 undergraduate students were surveyed on their opinions of distance learning. The responses to the survey indicated that distance learning was effective in providing the required knowledge to the students during the outbreak of COVID-19. The findings showed that although the lack of interaction and poor internet connections were factors affecting comfortable and successful learning of physics and mathematics, 63% of students were satisfied with learning management systems, 75% of students found it easy to understand course materials, and 67% of students found it easy to understand assignments and could deal with them comfortably. The study findings can encourage educational institutions to digitalize their learning materials in the future.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Educational technologies; Novel coronavirus; Online learning
Year: 2021 PMID: 34150983 PMCID: PMC8205273 DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inform Med Unlocked ISSN: 2352-9148
Fig. 1The study sample distribution.
The distribution of the sample members based on the study variables.
| Categories | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student | 300 | ||
| Male | 115 | 38.3% | |
| Female | 185 | 61.7% | |
| Saudi | 255 | 85% | |
| Non- Saudi | 45 | 15% | |
| 1st | 122 | 40.7% | |
| 2nd | 83 | 27.7% | |
| 3rd | 64 | 21.3% | |
| 4th | 31 | 10.3% | |
Correlation coefficients between paragraphs and the overall degree and the domain to which they belong.
| Item No. | Correlation Coefficients vs Domain | Correlation Coefficients vs Questionnaire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | .836 | .762 |
| 2 | .780 | .655 |
| 3 | .772 | .741 |
| 4 | .765 | .646 |
| 5 | .811 | .778 |
| 6 | .710 | .621 |
| 7 | .816 | .777 |
| 8 | .710 | .660 |
| 9 | .838 | .803 |
| 10 | .758 | .677 |
| 11 | .813 | .789 |
| 12 | .708 | .637 |
| 13 | .752 | .739 |
| 14 | .744 | .672 |
| 15 | .766 | .754 |
| 16 | .718 | .662 |
| 17 | .816 | .722 |
| 18 | .696 | .586 |
| 19 | .820 | .731 |
| 20 | .679 | .587 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Correlation coefficients between domains and the overall score.
| Domain | The effectiveness LMS as a learning tools | The effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms compared to Physical Classrooms | Ease of understanding the educational material | Ease of understanding the given assignments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The effectiveness LMS as a learning tools | 1 | |||
| The effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms compared to Physical Classrooms. | 0.772** | 1 | ||
| Ease of understanding the educational material | 0.713** | 0.802** | 1 | |
| Ease of understanding the given assignments | .740** | .745** | 0.750** | 1 |
The internal consistency coefficient of Cronbach's alpha and stability for domains and the total score of the questionnaire.
| Domain | Stability | Internal Consistency |
|---|---|---|
| The effectiveness LMS as a learning tools | .891 | .949 |
| The effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms compared to Physical Classrooms | .933 | .974 |
| Ease of understanding the educational material | .891 | .948 |
| Ease of understanding the given assignments | .951 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Fig. 2Percentage of Student's responses.
Fig. 3Percentage of Student's responses.
Fig. 4Percentage of Student's responses.
Fig. 5Percentage of Student's responses.
Means and standard deviations of the degree of students’ satisfaction.
| Rank | No. | Domain | Mean | Standard Deviation | Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | The effectiveness LMS as a learning tools | 3.95 | 0.88 | High |
| 2 | 3 | The effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms compared to Physical Classrooms | 3.84 | 0.87 | High |
| 3 | 2 | Ease of understanding the educational material | 3.80 | 0.88 | High |
| 4 | 4 | Ease of understanding the given assignments | 3.64 | 0.73 | Medium |
| Overall score of the questionnaire | 3.73 | 0.66 | High | ||
Means and standard deviations and t-test according to gender variable.
| Domain | Gender | No. | Mean | Standard deviation | t value | Degree of freedom | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The effectiveness LMS as a learning tools | Male | 115 | 3.863 | 0.658 | 101.901 | 299 | .000 |
| Female | 185 | 3.661 | 0.611 | ||||
| The effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms compared to Physical Classrooms | Male | 115 | 3.749 | 0.688 | 97.029 | 299 | .000 |
| Female | 185 | 3.664 | 0.642 | ||||
| Ease of understanding the educational material | Male | 115 | 3.822 | 0.592 | 104.938 | 299 | .000 |
| Female | 185 | 3.747 | 0.642 | ||||
| Ease of understanding the given assignments | Male | 115 | 3.811 | 0.583 | 110.299 | 299 | .000 |
| Female | 185 | 3.691 | 0.587 | ||||
| Overall degree of Questionnaire | Male | 115 | 3.625 | 0.574 | 128.004 | 299 | .000 |
| Female | 185 | 3.574 | 0.535 |
Means and standard deviations and t-test according to nationality variable.
| Domain | Nationality | No. | Mean | Standard deviation | t value | Degree of freedom | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The effectiveness LMS as a learning tools | Saudi | 255 | 3.853 | 0.639 | 101.901 | 299 | .000 |
| Non-Saudi | 45 | 3.695 | 0.631 | ||||
| The effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms compared to Physical Classrooms | Saudi | 255 | 3.741 | 0.636 | 97.029 | 299 | .000 |
| Non-Saudi | 45 | 3.679 | 0.670 | ||||
| Ease of understanding the educational material | Saudi | 255 | 3.851 | 0.580 | 104.938 | 299 | .000 |
| Non-Saudi | 45 | 3.747 | 0.639 | ||||
| Ease of understanding the given assignments | Saudi | 255 | 3.815 | 0.553 | 110.299 | 299 | .000 |
| Non-Saudi | 45 | 3.707 | 0.599 | ||||
| Overall degree of Questionnaire | Saudi | 255 | 3.611 | 0.629 | 128.004 | 299 | .000 |
| Non-Saudi | 45 | 3.331 | 0.598 |
Means and standard deviations and t-test according to year of study variable.
| Domain | Year of study | No. | Mean | Standard deviation | t value | Degree of freedom | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The effectiveness LMS as a learning tools | 1st | 122 | 3.759 | 0.637 | 101.901 | 299 | .000 |
| 2nd | 83 | 3.661 | 0.633 | ||||
| 3rd | 64 | 3.716 | 0.669 | ||||
| 4th | 31 | 3.622 | 0.626 | ||||
| The effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms compared to Physical Classrooms | 1st | 122 | 3.810 | 0.642 | 97.029 | 299 | .000 |
| 2nd | 83 | 3.651 | 0.538 | ||||
| 3rd | 64 | 3.762 | 0.601 | ||||
| 4th | 31 | 3.645 | 0.527 | ||||
| Ease of understanding the educational material | 1st | 122 | 3.699 | 0.625 | 104.938 | 299 | .000 |
| 2nd | 83 | 3.795 | 0.650 | ||||
| 3rd | 64 | 3.666 | 0.661 | ||||
| 4th | 31 | 3.739 | 0.659 | ||||
| Ease of understanding the given assignments | 1st | 122 | 3.740 | 0.637 | 110.299 | 299 | .000 |
| 2nd | 83 | 3.827 | 0.603 | ||||
| 3rd | 64 | 3.702 | 0.592 | ||||
| 4th | 31 | 3.787 | 0.579 | ||||
| Overall degree of Questionnaire | 1st | 122 | 3.590 | 0.649 | 128.004 | 299 | .000 |
| 2nd | 83 | 3.638 | 0.585 | ||||
| 3rd | 64 | 3.549 | 0.638 | ||||
| 4th | 31 | 3.486 | 0.731 |