| Literature DB >> 34150745 |
Geting Wu1, Yuanliang Yan2, Yuan Cai1, Bi Peng1, Juanni Li1, Jinzhou Huang3, Zhijie Xu1,4, Jianhua Zhou1.
Abstract
The AlkB family consists of Fe(II)- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases that can catalyze demethylation on a variety of substrates, such as RNA and DNA, subsequently affecting tumor progression and prognosis. However, their detailed functional roles in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have not been clarified in a comprehensive manner. In this study, several bioinformatics databases, such as ONCOMINE, TIMER, and DiseaseMeth, were used to evaluate the expression profiles and prognostic significance of the AlkB family (ALKBH1-8 and FTO) in LUAD. The expression levels of ALKBH1/2/4/5/7/8 were significantly increased in LUAD tissues, while the expression levels of ALKBH3/6 and FTO were decreased. The main functions of differentially expressed AlkB homologs are related to the hematopoietic system and cell adhesion molecules. We also found that the expression profiles of the AlkB family are highly correlated with infiltrating immune cells (i.e., B cells, CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells). In addition, DNA methylation analysis indicated that the global methylation levels of ALKBH1/2/4/5/6/8 and FTO were decreased, while the global methylation levels of ALKBH3/7 were increased. In addition, the patients with upregulated ALKBH2 have significantly poor overall survival (OS) and post-progressive survival (PPS). Taken together, our work could provide insightful information about aberrant AlkB family members as potential biomarkers for the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of LUAD. Especially, ALKBH2 could be served as a therapeutic candidate for treating LUAD.Entities:
Keywords: AlkB family; expression profiles; immune cell infiltration; lung adenocarcinoma; methylation; prognosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34150745 PMCID: PMC8209387 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.633927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
The expression profiles of the AlkB family in patients with LUAD using the Oncomine database.
| ALKBH1 | Garber Lung | 4.353 | 1.61E-4 | |
| Okayama Lung | 1.368 | 5.58E-8 | ||
| Su Lung | 1.100 | 0.035 | ||
| Landi Lung | 1.069 | 0.016 | ||
| Hou Lung | 1.108 | 0.009 | ||
| ALKBH2 | Selamat Lung | 1.204 | 6.56E-5 | |
| Hou Lung | 1.211 | 9.00E-4 | ||
| ALKBH4 | Su Lung | 1.684 | 8.00E-4 | |
| Hou Lung | 1.181 | 8.88E-7 | ||
| Selamat Lung | 1.113 | 7.63E-4 | ||
| Okayama Lung | 1.226 | 0.002 | ||
| ALKBH5 | Okayama Lung | 1.227 | 0.004 | |
| Hou Lung | 1.093 | 0.006 | ||
| ALKBH7 | Okayama Lung | 1.117 | 0.015 | |
| Hou Lung | 1.052 | 0.047 | ||
| ALKBH8 | Selamat Lung | 1.219 | 1.19E-5 |
FIGURE 1(A) mRNA expression levels of different AlkB family members in LUAD and normal lung samples (GEPIA). T and N indicated the LUAD tissues and normal tissues, respectively. (B) The relative expression of the AlkB family in LUAD. (C) Immunohistochemical expression of ALKB family in LUAD tissue and normal lung tissue (the Human Protein Atlas).
FIGURE 2(A) The relationship between mRNA expression and pathological stage of LUAD patients with different members of the AlkB family (UALCAN). (B) The relationship between mRNA expression of distinct AlkB family members with lymph node metastasis of LUAD patients (UALCAN). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3(A) The overall survival curve of AlkB molecules in LUAD patients (Kaplan-Meier plotter). (B) The post-progressive survival curve of the AlkB molecules in LUAD patients (Kaplan-Meier plotter).
FIGURE 4Genetic alternatives and correlation analysis of the AlkB family in LUAD. (A) Summary of the mutation rates in each AlkB family member in LUAD. (B) Correlation between different AlkB family in LUAD (GEPIA).
FIGURE 5Coexpression network analysis of the AlkB family in LUAD. (A) The PPI network of AlkB family interaction partners generated by the frequently used c-BioPortal and Cytoscape. (B) Primary molecular functions, biological processes and cell components related to the biology of the AlkB family were identified using WebGestalt. (C) Bar plot of KEGG enriched terms analyzed by WebGestalt.
FIGURE 6The correlations between differentially expressed AlkB family and immune cell infiltration. (A–I) The effect of ALKBH1-8 and FTO on the immune cell infiltration analyzed by TIMER2.0.
The Cox proportional hazard model of the ALKB family and six tumor-infiltrating immune cells in LUAD.
| B cell | –5.066 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.088 | 0.000 | *** |
| CD8_Tcell | 0.223 | 1.249 | 0.191 | 8.170 | 0.816 | |
| CD4_Tcell | 2.450 | 11.588 | 0.674 | 199.263 | 0.091 | |
| Macrophage | –0.438 | 0.645 | 0.047 | 8.932 | 0.744 | |
| Neutrophil | –0.368 | 0.692 | 0.014 | 33.222 | 0.852 | |
| Dendritic | –0.038 | 0.962 | 0.249 | 3.714 | 0.955 | |
| ALKBH1 | –0.042 | 0.959 | 0.624 | 1.474 | 0.848 | |
| ALKBH2 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.762 | 1.311 | 0.999 | |
| ALKBH3 | –0.088 | 0.915 | 0.720 | 1.164 | 0.471 | |
| ALKBH4 | –0.361 | 0.697 | 0.472 | 1.030 | 0.070 | |
| ALKBH5 | 0.234 | 1.263 | 0.877 | 1.819 | 0.209 | |
| ALKBH6 | 0.048 | 1.049 | 0.806 | 1.366 | 0.721 | |
| ALKBH7 | 0.109 | 1.115 | 0.839 | 1.482 | 0.452 | |
| ALKBH8 | 0.269 | 1.308 | 0.956 | 1.791 | 0.094 | |
| FTO | –0.201 | 0.818 | 0.584 | 1.147 | 0.244 |