| Literature DB >> 34150636 |
Xiaojie Liu1,2,3, Mingjing He1,2,3, Linlin Li1,2,3, Xiya Wang1,2,3, Shuhua Han1,2,3, Jinzhu Zhao1,2,3, Yalong Dong1,2,3, Mushtaq Ahmad1,2,3, Leilei Li1,2,3, Xueyan Zhang1,2,3, Junfeng Huo1,2,3, Yunfan Liu1, Chengxue Pan1,3, Cong Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
Drug resistance often occurs after chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients, leading to cancer metastasis and recurrence. However, the relationship among cancer cell migration, recurrence and drug resistance in esophageal cancer drug-resistant cells has not been clearly explained. In this study, we constructed paclitaxel (PTX)-resistant esophageal cancer cells to explore the causes of drug resistance and poor prognosis after chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. Colony formation assay was used to evaluate the difference of colony formation between parental cells and drug resistance cells. Microsphere formation assay was used to examine the phenotype of stem cells. Wound healing and Transwell assays were used to detect the migration ability of drug-resistant cells. Western blotting and immunofluorescence assays were used to explore the mechanisms. Finally, we used nude mouse xenograft model to explore the tumor characteristics and the expression of relative proteins to verify our findings in vivo. Our study demonstrated that the cancer cell stemness characteristics exist in drug-resistant esophageal cancer cells, that expressed the biomarkers of stem cells and were prone to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Our results suggested that the expression of EMT biomarkers and stemness-related proteins increased in esophageal cancer cells after continuously using chemotherapeutic drugs for a period of time. This study indicated that simultaneously targeting EMT and stemness could be a better strategy for the treatment of esophageal cancer drug resistance.Entities:
Keywords: drug resistance; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; esophageal cancer; paclitaxel; stemness
Year: 2021 PMID: 34150636 PMCID: PMC8209423 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.672222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1PTX-resistant EC109 and TE-1cells. (A, B) MTT assay on the survival of parental cells and PTX-resistant cells under the treatment with PTX, Cis-platinum and 5-Fluorouracil. (C) Cell morphology photographed under an inverted microscope. Scale bar: 500 µm (100×), 250 µm (200×). (D) Colony formation assay on the two groups of cells and the corresponding PTX solvent as control. (E) The corresponding statistical results of colony formation. *P < 0.05 indicates statistically significance vs. parental cells. **P < 0.01 indicates highly statistically significant vs. parental cells.
Drug sensitivity tests (PTX).
| Cell lines | IC50 ± SD (nM) | Resistant Index |
|---|---|---|
|
| 8.69 ± 2.06 | – |
|
| 93.88 ± 7.36 | 10.80 ± 2.32 |
|
| 5.47 ± 0.18 | – |
|
| 56.84 ± 2.31 | 10.38 ± 0.08 |
The results are shown as mean ± SD.
Drug sensitivity tests (Cis-platinum and 5-Fluorouracil).
| Cell lines | IC50 ± SD (Cis-platinum, μM) | Resistant Index | IC50 ± SD (5-Fluorouracil, μM) | Resistant Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5.52 ± 0.73 | – | 21.53 ± 4.04 | – |
|
| 13.01 ± 0.14 | 2.36 ± 0.03 | 66.81 ± 2.18 | 3.10 ± 1.29 |
|
| 25.84 ± 1.45 | – | 47.29 ± 3.67 | – |
|
| 39.72 ± 3.09 | 1.54 ± 0.29 | 469.64 ± 24.31 | 9.93 ± 0.49 |
The results are shown as mean ± SD.
Figure 2Enhanced cancer cell stemness in the drug-resistant cells. (A, B) Sphere formation assay on the two groups of cells and the corresponding statistical results. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C, D) LDA-Sphere formation assay on the two groups of cells and the corresponding statistical results. Scale bar: 100 µm. (E, F) Western blotting on the stem cell protein biomarkers and the corresponding statistical results. (G, H) Immunofluorescence analysis detected the expression of stem cell protein biomarkers NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 in the two groups of cells. Scale bar: 100 µm (TE-1, TE-1/PTX), 200 µm (EC109, EC109/PTX). *P < 0.05 indicates statistically significance vs. parental cells. **P < 0.01 indicates highly statistically significant vs. parental cells.
Figure 3The migratory ability enhanced and the expression of EMT biomarkers changed in the PTX-treated cells. (A, B) Wound healing assay was used for the migration ability of the two groups of the cells and the corresponding statistical results. Scale bar: 500 µm. (C, D) Transwell assay on the two groups of the cells and the corresponding statistical results. Scale bar: 500 µm. (E–G) Western blotting evaluated the representative proteins of EMT and the corresponding statistical results. *P < 0.05 indicates statistically significance vs. parental cells. **P < 0.01 indicates highly statistically significant vs. parental cells.
Biochemical Indexes of Serum.
| Biochemical Indexes | EC109 | EC109/PTX |
|---|---|---|
|
| 13.41 ± 1.89 IU/L | 15.01 ± 1.18 IU/L |
|
| 28.04 ± 6.39 IU/L | 29.75 ± 1.93 IU/L |
|
| 15.63 ± 2.82 mol/L | 20.40 ± 3.21 mol/L |
|
| 107.50 ± 12.24 mol/L | 74.28 ± 16.14 mol/L ** |
**P < 0.01 indicates highly statistically significant vs. EC109 cells.
Blood Biochemical Index.
| Blood Biochemical Index | EC109 | EC109/PTX |
|---|---|---|
|
| 7.49 ± 1.80 109/L | 3.81 ± 2.20 109/L ** |
|
| 9.81 ± 0.39 1012/L | 8.95 ± 0.71 1012/L |
|
| 155.83 ± 5.46 g/L | 146.60 ± 5.31 g/L |
|
| 49.7 ± 2.19% | 45.23 ± 2.98% |
|
| 50.62 ± 0.57 fL | 50.38 ± 0.80 fL |
|
| 15.85 ± 0.28 pg | 16.50 ± 1.52 pg |
|
| 313.5 ± 3.86 g/L | 327.40 ± 25.41 g/L |
|
| 14.13 ± 0.26% | 14.33 ± 0.59% |
|
| 29.67 ± 0.75 FI | 30.00 ± 1.55 FI |
|
| 826.67 ± 80.77 109/L | 727.60 ± 115.32 109/L |
|
| 0.59 ± 0.04% | 0.52 ± 0.10% |
|
| 7.13 ± 0.35 fL | 7.06 ± 0.32 fL |
|
| 16.63 ± 0.11% | 15.94 ± 0.28% |
**P < 0.01 indicates highly statistically significant vs. EC109 cells.
Figure 4EC109 and EC109/PTX cell growth in vivo and the expression of EMT-related and stemness-related proteins. (A) The mice and tumor tissues of the two groups after implanting tumor cells for 20 days. (B–D) The body weight, tumor volume and tumor weight of the mice and tumor. (E, F) Western blotting for the expression of the EMT-related and stemness-related proteins and the corresponding statistical results. (G) Tumor tissue was stained with HE, the nucleus was stained blue-violet, and the cytoplasm was stained red. Scale bar: 200 µm. *P < 0.05 indicates statistically significance vs. EC109 cells. **P < 0.01 indicates highly statistically significant vs. EC109 cells.
Figure 5A schema summarized this study.