| Literature DB >> 34150624 |
Ana Hipólito1,2, Filipa Martins1,2, Cindy Mendes1,2, Filipa Lopes-Coelho1,2, Jacinta Serpa1,2.
Abstract
Metastasis is a major hurdle to the efficient treatment of cancer, accounting for the great majority of cancer-related deaths. Although several studies have disclosed the detailed mechanisms underlying primary tumor formation, the emergence of metastatic disease remains poorly understood. This multistep process encompasses the dissemination of cancer cells to distant organs, followed by their adaptation to foreign microenvironments and establishment in secondary tumors. During the last decades, it was discovered that these events may be favored by particular metabolic patterns, which are dependent on reprogrammed signaling pathways in cancer cells while they acquire metastatic traits. In this review, we present current knowledge of molecular mechanisms that coordinate the crosstalk between metastatic signaling and cellular metabolism. The recent findings involving the contribution of crucial metabolic pathways involved in the bioenergetics and biosynthesis control in metastatic cells are summarized. Finally, we highlight new promising metabolism-based therapeutic strategies as a putative way of impairing metastasis.Entities:
Keywords: metabolic reprogramming; metastasis; metastatic cascade; new therapies; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34150624 PMCID: PMC8209414 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.656851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Hematogenous metastatic route. The metastatic cascade starts with molecular and morphological changes in cancer cells, enabling their release from the primary tumor. The production of tumor secreted factors (e.g. MMPs) by cancer cells to degrade the extracellular matrix (ECM) (1), helps the gain of migratory and invasive abilities (2). The metastasizing cancer cells, depending on the cancer type, rely on epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), in which cancer cells acquires a mesenchymal phenotype through the loss epithelial cell-cell contacts, as E-Cadherin, to facilitate the penetration into the basal membrane. However, in other scenarios collective or cluster‐based migration and invasion can contribute to cancer cell intravasation independent of EMT. The different phases of the hematogenous metastatic cascade are: local invasion (1 and 2); intravasation into vessels (3); circulation into the bloodstream (4); extravasion into a distant organ or tissue (5), and the formation of a secondary tumor in the metastatic niche (6). The metabolic remodeling during the metastatic processes is crucial for the efficient colonization of cancer cells in distant sites, typically nutrient and oxygen-rich areas, as lungs, liver, bones and brain.
Figure 2Main pathways involved in the metabolic remodeling of metastatic cancer cells, pivotal for energy and biomass production. Metastatic cancer cells are metabolically more plastic than non-metastatic cancer cells, because they need to survive in primary tumor microenvironment, and they must also prosper in the microenvironment of the metastasized organ. Glycolysis is a multi-step process, in which the expression of key glycolytic enzymes as hexokinase 2 (HK2) that converts glucose in glucose-6-phosphate (G6P), 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) that promotes the conversion of fructose-6-phosphate (F6P) in fructose-2,6-biphosphate (F2,6BP; an allosteric activator of the glycolytic enzyme phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK1)) and pyruvate by tumor M2-pyruvate kinase (PKM2) that synthesizes pyruvate from phosphoenolpyruvic acid (PEP) have been showed to be involved in metastases establishment. Pyruvate is an endpoint product of glycolysis that after its conversion into acetyl-CoA, which can alternatively be produced from acetate, under the action of acyl-coenzyme A synthase short-chain family member 2 (ACSS2), then it will supply the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle or the synthesis of fatty acids (FA). Additionality, FA can be imported by CD36, being the FA pool deviated to FA b-oxidation (FAO). Glycolysis intermediate glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) can be diverged from glycolysis to supply phosphate pentose pathway (PPP) through the action of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), catalyzing the conversion of G6P into glucono-1,5-lactone-6P (G1,5L6P) and generating nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH). The 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) converts 6-phosphogluconate (6PG) into ribose-5-phosphate (R5P), concomitantly with NAPDH production. Amino acids metabolism is crucial in biosynthesis and bioenergetics. The serine and glycine syntheses and the one-carbon metabolism play a central role in cell metabolism. The action of serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) catalyzes the conversion of serine into glycine, generating NADPH. NAPDH will be essential for the reduction of glutathione disulfide (GSSG) into glutathione (GSH) by the action of glutathione reductase (GR). In turn, the oxidation of GSH in GSSG by glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is essential for the control of the redox state of metastasizing cancer cells. Moreover, cysteine, glutamate and glycine are used in GSH synthesis. Glutamine catabolism through the action of glutaminase 1 (GLS1) leads to the production of glutamate and ammonia (NH3). In turn, glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GLDH1) converts glutamate into α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) that will fulfill TCA cycle. In mitochondria, glutamate is a target of glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 2 (GOT-2), producing α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) and aspartate, at the expense of oxaloacetate (OAA). In cytoplasm, the action of GOT-1, at the expense α-KG, leads to glutamate production that can be converted into proline by the action of proline dehydrogenase (PRODH). Moreover, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (PYCR) catalyzes the inverse reaction, leading to the conversion of proline into glutamate. Aspartate catabolism by asparagine synthetase (ASNS) promotes asparagine synthesis. Cysteine in cytoplasm is essential for GSH synthesis while in mitochondria, its catabolism by the cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) route; the cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE) route and the CAT/GOT:3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MST) axis route leads to the production of pyruvate and hydrogen sulfide (H2S).
Figure 3Targeting metabolic pathways as a putative strategy to tackle metastatic cancer. Glycolytic inhibitors have been shown as being a promising application for the treatment of metastatic cancer. The compound 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG) acts as an inhibitor of hexokinase 2 (HK-2), while 3PO, 1-(4-pyridinyl)-3-(2-quinolinyl)-2-propen-1-one (PFK15) and ACT-PFK-158 were designed to inhibit the activity of PFKFB3. A modified version of lonidamine was developed to inhibit OXPHOS and mitochondrial bioenergetics. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenases 1/2 (IDH 1/2) leads to the generation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), being the development of IDHmut inhibitors, as AGI-5027, AGI-5198, and AG-120, an attempt to abrogate 2-HG production. Moreover, omeprazole and orlistat, inhibitors of fatty acid synthase (FASN), showed a promising clinical applicability in the treatment of metastatic cancer.