Literature DB >> 34150593

Anatomical and Surgical Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of "C-M-S" Technique in Facial Nerve Identification During Parotid Surgery.

Ashish S Shah1, Satish Nair1, V Pavithra1, J G Aishwarya1, K V R Brijith1, Deeksha Thakur1.   

Abstract

Facial nerve identification is considered to be a crucial step in parotid surgery as inadvertent injury to the nerve will lead to facial paralysis. Multiple landmarks are described in literature to identify the facial nerve during parotid surgery but controversies remain as the consistency and accuracy of these landmarks vary. Numerous studies exist in literature but they fail to address a single landmark that is most reliable to identify the facial nerve during parotid surgery. The purpose of this study is to find reliable landmarks for identification of the main trunk of facial nerve during parotid surgery by evidence gathered by cadaveric dissection and intraoperative study during parotid surgery and develop a systematic approach to identify the facial nerve trunk. This prospective study included 41 cadavers (82 parotid regions) and 20 patients with parotid pathology who underwent parotidectomy. We evaluated the feasibility of our C-M-S technique to identify the main trunk of facial nerve in both anatomical and surgical study. The relationship of landmarks (tragal pointer, tympanomastoid suture, superior border of posterior belly of digastric muscle) to the facial nerve trunk was assessed and the shortest distance between them from the facial trunk was measured using a slide caliper. The measurements were compared between the anatomical and surgical study. The main trunk of facial nerve was successfully identified in all cases using C-M-S technique in both anatomical and surgical study. Distance of facial nerve trunk to tragal pointer was more in the cadaveric sample (13.04 ± 5.238 mm) compared to live patients (9.95 ± 3.967 mm) with statistically significant difference (p = 0.036). The mean distance of tympanomastoid suture and posterior belly of digastric muscle to the facial nerve trunk was similar in anatomical and surgical study with p value of 0.877 and 0.083 respectively. The tympanomastoid suture, posterior belly of digastric muscle and tragal pointer are the most useful landmarks for facial nerve identification during parotid surgery. In our study we found that the tympanomastoid suture line is the most consistent landmark present in all our cases and being closest to the facial nerve trunk in both anatomical and surgical study. Further we recommend using the "C-M-S technique" in order to locate the main trunk of the facial nerve. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical study; Facial nerve; Parotid surgery; Posterior belly of digastric; Surgical study; Tragal pointer; Tympanomastoid suture

Year:  2021        PMID: 34150593      PMCID: PMC8163908          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02329-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  8 in total

1.  Landmarks for parotid gland surgery.

Authors:  J A de Ru; P P van Benthem; R L Bleys; H Lubsen; G J Hordijk
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Identification of the facial nerve main trunk by retrograde dissection of the postauricular branch.

Authors:  Michael A Keefe; Jerry R Castro; Morgan S Keefe
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Surgical Landmarks to Locating the Main Trunk of the Facial Nerve in Parotid Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yisi D Ji; R Bruce Donoff; Zachary S Peacock; Eric R Carlson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Facial nerve in recurrent benign pleomorphic adenoma.

Authors:  J Conley; A A Clairmont
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1979-05

5.  The early development of the parotid gland around the facial nerve and its branches in man.

Authors:  R F Gasser
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1970-05

6.  Exposure of the facial nerve in parotid surgery. (Use of the tympanomastoid fissure as a guide).

Authors:  H G Tabb; A N Scalco; S F Fraser
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Conventional and 3-Dimensional Computerized Tomography in Eagle's Syndrome, Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia, and Asymptomatic Controls.

Authors:  David T Kent; Tanya J Rath; Carl Snyderman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  The stylomastoid artery as an anatomical landmark to the facial nerve during parotid surgery: a clinico-anatomic study.

Authors:  Tahwinder Upile; Waseem Jerjes; Seyed Ahmad Reza Nouraei; Sandeep U Singh; Panagiotis Kafas; Ann Sandison; Holger Sudhoff; Colin Hopper
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.754

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  New study on prevalence of anosmia in COVID-19 implicates the D614G virus mutation as a major contributing factor to chemosensory dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher S von Bartheld; Dennis Mathew; Rafal Butowt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.