Literature DB >> 34150288

Evaluation of iron and manganese removal effectiveness by treatment plant modules based on water pollution index; a comprehensive approach.

Nima Kalvani1, Alireza Mesdaghinia1,2, Kamyar Yaghmaeian1,3, Samaneh Abolli1,4, Sommayeh Saadi1, Abdollah Rashidi Mehrabadi1,2,5, Mahmood Alimohammadi6.   

Abstract

Groundwater is a viable alternative when access to surface water resources is limited. Iron and manganese are known ions in soil and naturally in groundwater sources. However, human activities also are responsible. To identifying the best module for removing manganese and iron in the water treatment plant (WTP) of Mazandaran, 516 samples were taken from raw and treated water. The concentration of manganese, iron, was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and turbidity was used with the nephelometry method. The water pollution index (WPI) was applied for categorizing the status of pollution in treated water. The effect of seasonal temperature and backwashing (At flow rates of 3.5, 9.2, and 15.3 m h-1) on the sand filter efficiency was also investigated. The highest concentrations of manganese, iron, and turbidity in raw water were 0.744, 6.70 mg L-1, and 41.8 NTU, and in treated water were 0.67, 1.09 mg L-1, and 5.58 NTU, respectively. The mean concentration of manganese and iron in raw and treated water were 0.24 ± 0.1, 0.93 ± 0.91, 0.105 ± 0.06 and 0.18 ± 0.14 mg L-1 respectively. The WPI statuses in drinking water were excellent for manganese and iron in 95.74 and 53.88 % of the samples and very poor in 1.16 and 12.01 % of the samples, respectively, and its classification for drinking water for manganese and iron was excellent ˃ good ˃ extremely polluted ˃ polluted and the concentration of iron was more than manganese in treated water. The study of temperature's effect on sand filters showed that the removal efficiency in warm seasons was higher than in cold seasons. Also, the turbulence in the backwash with the 9.2 m h- 1 rates, is lesser than other speeds, and in this flow, after 270 s, the turbidity decreases to less than 10 NTU. Spearman correlation comparison showed that the parameters amounts after filtration decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.0001) in comparison to raw water. The results showed that module #1 that used open-aeration and chlorine as oxidations, was most effective in removing iron and manganese. In the end, the WTP couldn't diminish the parameters completely and need subsidiary units. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iron; Manganese; Mazandaran; WPI; Water

Year:  2021        PMID: 34150288      PMCID: PMC8172764          DOI: 10.1007/s40201-021-00665-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng


  10 in total

1.  Point of use household drinking water filtration: A practical, effective solution for providing sustained access to safe drinking water in the developing world.

Authors:  Mark D Sobsey; Christine E Stauber; Lisa M Casanova; Joseph M Brown; Mark A Elliott
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Determination of heavy metal content of processed fruit products from Tehran's market using ICP- OES: A risk assessment study.

Authors:  Ayub Ebadi Fathabad; Nabi Shariatifar; Mojtaba Moazzen; Shahrokh Nazmara; Yadolah Fakhri; Mahmood Alimohammadi; Ali Azari; Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 3.  Manganese and its role in Parkinson's disease: from transport to neuropathology.

Authors:  Michael Aschner; Keith M Erikson; Elena Herrero Hernández; Elena Herrero Hernández; Ronald Tjalkens
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Reducing health risks from wastewater use in urban and peri-urban sub-Saharan Africa: applying the 2006 WHO guidelines.

Authors:  P Drechsel; B Keraita; P Amoah; R C Abaidoo; L Raschid-Sally; A Bahri
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.915

5.  Application of the Entropy Weighted Water Quality Index (EWQI) and the Pollution Index of Groundwater (PIG) to Assess Groundwater Quality for Drinking Purposes: A Case Study in a Rural Area of Telangana State, India.

Authors:  Narsimha Adimalla
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Removal of iron and manganese in groundwater through magnetotactic bacteria.

Authors:  J A Diaz-Alarcón; M P Alfonso-Pérez; I Vergara-Gómez; M Díaz-Lagos; S A Martínez-Ovalle
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Iron release from corroded iron pipes in drinking water distribution systems: effect of dissolved oxygen.

Authors:  P Sarin; V L Snoeyink; J Bebee; K K Jim; M A Beckett; W M Kriven; J A Clement
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Carcinogenic and Non-carcinogenic Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Groundwater Wells in Neyshabur Plain, Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Najafi Saleh; Maryam Panahande; Mahmood Yousefi; Farzaneh Baghal Asghari; Gea Oliveri Conti; Elham Talaee; Ali Akbar Mohammadi
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Data on corrosion and scaling potential of drinking water resources using stability indices in Jolfa, East Azerbaijan, Iran.

Authors:  Mahmood Yousefi; Hossein Najafi Saleh; Amir Hossein Mahvi; Mahmood Alimohammadi; Ramin Nabizadeh; Ali Akbar Mohammadi
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-12-06

10.  Data on water quality index for the groundwater in rural area Neyshabur County, Razavi province, Iran.

Authors:  Mahmood Yousefi; Hossein Najafi Saleh; Ali Akbar Mohammadi; Amir Hossein Mahvi; Mansour Ghadrpoori; Hamed Suleimani
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-11-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.