Literature DB >> 34150213

Draft genome of Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T isolated from cotton-waste composts for mushroom cultivation.

L J Kangale1,2, A Levasseur2,3, D Raoult2,3,4, E Ghigo2,5, P-E Fournier1,2.   

Abstract

In this article, we present the draft genome sequence of Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T (= CSUR Q2603 T = DSM 17723 = JCM 16399 = KACC 11279), that is a new Metabacillus species isolated from cotton-waste composts. The genome sequence from Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T was assembled into 462 contigs for a total size of 4,987,608 bp with a G + C content of 35.5%.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSUR, Collection de Souches de l’Unitédes Rickettsies.; Cotton-waste; DSMZ, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures; Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T; genome; mushroom; planarian

Year:  2021        PMID: 34150213      PMCID: PMC8192859          DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbes New Infect        ISSN: 2052-2975


Announcement

Metabacillus fastidiosus is considered as type species of genus Metabacillus [1]. Strain 4T19T was isolated from cotton-waste composts for mushroom cultivation and was described as type strain of Metabacillus niabensis [2]. Working on planarians microbiota, we identified a bacterial strain, Marseille-P9898 (= CSUR P9898 = DSM 111480). We found that Marseille-P9898 strain had similarity at the level of a 16S rRNA gene sequence with Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T (98.99%). This 16S rRNA gene similarity value does not discriminate the strain Marseille-P9898 from the strain 4T19T. However, the characterisation of the strain Marseille-P9898 by a taxonogenomics approach requires the genome from the strain 4T19T, but to date, no genome sequence is available for the strain 4T19T. Thus, here, we describe the draft genome of Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T. We purchased the strain 4T19T (=DSM 17723) from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH and deposited in the Collection de Souches de l’Unité des Rickettsies (CSUR) culture collection under the number Q2603. Strain 4T19T was grown at 28°C for 24 hours on Columbia agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) in aerobic atmosphere. To extract bacterial genomic DNA (gDNA) of the strain Q2603, a mechanical treatment was first performed on a single colony, by glass beads acid washed (Sigma Aldrich Chimie, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) using a FastPrep-24™ 5G Grinder (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France) at maximum speed (6.5) for 90 s. Then after a 30-minute lysozyme incubation at 37°C, DNA (gDNA) was extracted using an EZ1 BioRobot and the EZ1 DNA tissue kit (Cat No./ID: 953034, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The gDNA was sequenced using MiSeq technology (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) [3] with the Nextera XT DNA sample prep kit (Illumina), and mate-pair strategy. Foremost, gDNA was fragmented, then amplified to 12 cycle of PCR, followed by the addition of the tag adapters and introduced dual-index barcodes. Libraries were purified on AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Inc, Fullerton, CA, USA), then normalised on specific beads following the Nextera XT protocol and pooled into a single library for sequencing. After 39 hours, automated cluster generation and paired-end sequencing with dual-index reads were performed in a single run in 2 × 250-bp format. The 6,897,812 paired-end reads of the Miseq run were checked in accordance with quality using FastQC 0.11.8 [9] and trimmed using Trimmomatic 0.36.6 [8], with default parameters. Trimmed reads were assembled using the Spades [4] genome assembler software (Galaxy 3.12.0+galaxy1) set with default parameters. Default parameters were applied here and for all software (for k values, i.e. k-mer values of 127, 99, 77, 55, 33 and 21). Using default parameters of SSAKE-based Scaffolding of Pre-Assembled Contigs after Extension (SSPACE 2.0) [5] and GapFiller (GapFiller 1.10) [6] allowed us to combine the contigs. Briefly, we have obtained 792 scaffolds after assembly, then using SSAKE, we reduced to 520 scaffolds and the manual finishing allowed us to obtain 462 scaffolds (singletons = 473, multicontig scaffold = 15), then manual finishing by using sequence similarity searches and syntax block detection between closest species in the Metabacillus genus (using type strain of the Metabacillus halosaccharovorans, Metabacillus litoralis and Metabacillus fastidiosus). For contigs profiling, a BLAST e-value threshold of 1e-10 was set to perform similarity searches and contig length threshold was set to 500 pb and a contig coverage threshold of 15% was applied. Finally, Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T was assembled into 462 contigs (N50, 19,230 bp; L50, 64; coverage, 5x) for a total size of 4,987,608 bp, with a G + C content of 35.5%. Genomic annotation was obtained by NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline (pGAP) [7]. A total of 4969 genes were identified, along with 11 rRNAs, 61 tRNAs, 6 ncRNA and 1tmRNA. A genomic comparison considering the size, GC% and contig was performed (Table 1), evidencing that Metabacillus niabensis is different of the other species of Metabacillus. To note, Metabacillus niabensis is a motile Gram negative and aerobic bacteria, growing from 15 to 40°C. Metabacillus niabensis is catalase and betagalactosidase positive, and oxidase negative, and the principal fatty acid found in this bacterium is the 12-methyl-tetradecanoic acid [10].
Table 1

Genomic comparison of Metabacillus niabensis with others genus Bacillus, Mesobacillus, Metabacillus and Neobacillus

NameSize (bp)GC%ContigsRefseq
Bacillus flexus3,906,16337.6259BCVD01000001.1
Bacillus acidicola5,137,99239.410LWJG01000001.1
Mesobacillus foraminis5,730,82343.035SLVV01000001.1
Metabacillus halosaccharovorans5,399,32736.18MTIR01000001.1
Metabacillus litoralis5,230,62435.91NZ_CP033043.1
Metabacillus niabensis4,987,60835.5462NZ_CADEPK010000000
Neobacillus niacini2,201,25338.3143JRYQ01000001.1
Metabacillus fastidiosus4,410,64535.1239NZ_BCVG00000000.1
Mesobacillus subterraneus4,571,17043.942RSFW01000001.1
Bacillus cohnii4,899,14136.11NZ_CP018866.1

Genomic comparison considering the size, GC% and contigs. Refseq: numbers reference sequence in NCBI.

Genomic comparison of Metabacillus niabensis with others genus Bacillus, Mesobacillus, Metabacillus and Neobacillus Genomic comparison considering the size, GC% and contigs. Refseq: numbers reference sequence in NCBI.

Data availability

The complete 16S rRNA gene sequence of Metabacillus niabensis have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers AY998119. The genome sequence Metabacillus niabensis have been deposited at GenBank under the accession number CADEPK010000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/wgs/CADEPK01?display = contigs&page = 1). Illumina MiSeq paired-end sequencing raw data have been deposited under accession number ERR4020000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/ERR4020000). The Metabacillus niabensis strain 4T19T is available at the Collection under the reference CSUR Q2603 = DSM 17723 = JCM 16399 = KACC 11279.

Author contribution statement

LJK conceived the experiments, realised the experiments, analysed the data, prepared figures, wrote the manuscript. DR, EG, AL and PEF designed the experiments, conceived the experiments, analysed the data, wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or manuscript preparation.
  9 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE.

Authors:  Marten Boetzer; Christiaan V Henkel; Hans J Jansen; Derek Butler; Walter Pirovano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  MiSeq: A Next Generation Sequencing Platform for Genomic Analysis.

Authors:  Rupesh Kanchi Ravi; Kendra Walton; Mahdieh Khosroheidari
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

4.  A phylogenomic and comparative genomic framework for resolving the polyphyly of the genus Bacillus: Proposal for six new genera of Bacillus species, Peribacillus gen. nov., Cytobacillus gen. nov., Mesobacillus gen. nov., Neobacillus gen. nov., Metabacillus gen. nov. and Alkalihalobacillus gen. nov.

Authors:  Sudip Patel; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Bacillus niabensis sp. nov., isolated from cotton-waste composts for mushroom cultivation.

Authors:  Soon-Wo Kwon; Seon-Young Lee; Byung-Yong Kim; Hang-Yeon Weon; Jung-Bong Kim; Seung-Joo Go; Gil-Bok Lee
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller.

Authors:  Marten Boetzer; Walter Pirovano
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  FastQ Screen: A tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control.

Authors:  Steven W Wingett; Simon Andrews
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.