| Literature DB >> 34150209 |
Chloé Brahmi1, Leila Chapron2, Gilles Le Moullac3, Claude Soyez3, Benoît Beliaeff3, Claire E Lazareth4, Nabila Gaertner-Mazouni1, Jeremie Vidal-Dupiol3,5.
Abstract
Many reef organisms, such as the giant clams, are confronted with global change effects. Abnormally high seawater temperatures can lead to mass bleaching events and subsequent mortality, while ocean acidification may impact biomineralization processes. Despite its strong ecological and socio-economic importance, its responses to these threats still need to be explored. We investigated physiological responses of 4-year-old Tridacna maxima to realistic levels of temperature (+1.5°C) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) (+800 μatm of CO2) predicted for 2100 in French Polynesian lagoons during the warmer season. During a 65-day crossed-factorial experiment, individuals were exposed to two temperatures (29.2°C, 30.7°C) and two pCO2 (430 μatm, 1212 μatm) conditions. The impact of each environmental parameter and their potential synergetic effect were evaluated based on respiration, biomineralization and photophysiology. Kinetics of thermal and/or acidification stress were evaluated by performing measurements at different times of exposure (29, 41, 53, 65 days). At 30.7°C, the holobiont O2 production, symbiont photosynthetic yield and density were negatively impacted. High pCO2 had a significant negative effect on shell growth rate, symbiont photosynthetic yield and density. No significant differences of the shell microstructure were observed between control and experimental conditions in the first 29 days; however, modifications (i.e. less-cohesive lamellae) appeared from 41 days in all temperature and pCO2 conditions. No significant synergetic effect was found. Present thermal conditions (29.2°C) appeared to be sufficiently stressful to induce a host acclimatization response. All these observations indicate that temperature and pCO2 are both forcing variables affecting T. maxima's physiology and jeopardize its survival under environmental conditions predicted for the end of this century.Entities:
Keywords: Giant clams; ocean acidification; photosynthetic yield; respiration; symbionts; thermal stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 34150209 PMCID: PMC8208665 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coab041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Measured and calculated parameters of seawater for all treatments
| Treatments | Temperature (°C) |
| pHNBS | Salinity (‰) | AT (μmol/kg SW) | DIC (μmol/kg SW) | Ωaragonite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 29.2 (±0.1) | 428 (±21) | 8.19 (±0.01) | 35 | 2422 (±170) | 2071 (±85) | 4.17 |
| Thermal stress | 30.7 (±0.1) | 431(±25) | 8.19 (±0.01) | 35 | 2409 (±157) | 2051 (±89) | 4.14 |
| Acidification stress | 29.2 (±0.1) | 1210 (±41) | 7.81 (±0.03) | 35 | 2466 (±90) | 2306 (±34) | 1.99 |
| Acidification and thermal stress | 30.7 (±0.1) | 1213 (±29) | 7.81 (±0.03) | 35 | 2423 (±110) | 2252 (±58) | 2.02 |
Total alkalinity (AT) is given in mean (±SD) based on weekly measurements for each experimental tank and for each condition. pCO2, Ωaragonite and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) were calculated using the CO2SYS software.
Figure 1Variations of O2 production and O2 consumption acquired over a 48-h period after 29 days of exposure to different temperature/pCO2 conditions: (A) 29.2°C, 430 μatm of CO2; (B) 30.7°C, 430 μatm of CO2; (C) 29.2°C, 1212 μatm of CO2; and (D) 30.7°C, 1212 μatm of CO2. Data are expressed in mg O2.h−1.g−1 tissue dry weight (dw) and correspond to day-time and night-time acquisitions for four replicates per condition (each color line represents one replicate).
Figure 2Graphs reporting data of (A) oxygen production, (B) oxygen consumption, (C) symbiont photosynthethic yield, (D) symbiont density and (E) daily shell extension rate obtained for each temperature/pCO2 experimental condition and time of exposure (black and grey columns correspond to 430 μatm and 1212 μatm, respectively). Data are given in mean (+SD) calculated from four replicates for all physiological parameters except for daily shell extension rate for which numbers of replicates are specified.
Results from Tukey post hoc tests following the three-way ANOVA performed on analyzed physiological parameters
| O2 production | Photosynthetic yield | Symbiont density | Shell extension rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 29 days | a | a | a | a |
| 41 days | ab | ab | ab | ab | |
| 53 days | ab | ab | b | b | |
| 65 days | b | b | b | b | |
| Temperature | 29.2 °C | a | a | a | - |
| 30.7 °C | b | b | b | - | |
|
| 430 | - | a | a | a |
| 1212 | - | b | b | b | |
| Time × temperature | 29 days × 29.2°C | - | ab | - | - |
| 41 days × 29.2°C | - | a | - | - | |
| 53 days × 29.2°C | - | a | - | - | |
| 65 days × 29.2°C | - | a | - | - | |
| 29 days × 30.7°C | - | cd | - | - | |
| 41 days × 30.7°C | - | abc | - | - | |
| 53 days × 30.7°C | - | bcd | - | - | |
| 65 days × 30.7°C | - | d | - | - |
The effects of significant parameters were tested as time of exposure alone and combined to the temperature.
The letter annotations correspond to the significances between conditions (P < 0.05).
Results from the three-way ANOVA performed on holobiont O2 production and consumption data, symbiont photosynthetic yield, symbiont density and giant clam shell extension rate
| O2 production ( | O2 consumption ( | Photosynthetic yield ( | Symbiont density ( | Shell extension rate ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time |
| 3.264 | 0.740 | 3.566 | 6.035 | 4.695 |
|
| 0.030* | 0.533 | 0.021* | 0.001*** | 0.007** | |
| Temperature |
| 7.551 | 0.294 | 65.200 | 79.158 | 0.466 |
|
| 0.009** | 0.590 | <0.0001*** | <0.0001*** | 0.499 | |
|
|
| 0.846 | 0.851 | 6.125 | 8.665 | 7.409 |
|
| 0.362 | 0.361 | 0.017* | 0.005** | 0.010** | |
| Time × temperature |
| 0.413 | 0.965 | 3.393 | 1.528 | 0.319 |
|
| 0.744 | 0.417 | 0.025* | 0.219 | 0.812 | |
| Time × |
| 1.765 | 0.476 | 0.024 | 1.033 | 0.251 |
|
| 0.167 | 0.700 | 0.995 | 0.386 | 0.860 | |
| Temperature × |
| 1.334 | 1.029 | 0.100 | 1.989 | 0.026 |
|
| 0.254 | 0.315 | 0.753 | 0.165 | 0.872 | |
| Time × temperature x |
| 1.216 | 0.148 | 2.153 | 0.474 | 0.336 |
|
| 0.314 | 0.930 | 0.106 | 0.702 | 0.799 |
The three fixed factors are pCO2, temperature and time of exposure.
Asterisks denote significant differences (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001).
Compilation of ultrastructural observations of lamellae of the shell outer layer and the periostracum using SEM
| Time of exposure | Temperature (°C) |
| Sample | Lamellae of outer shell layer | Periostracum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | ND | |
| B | ND | ||||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | ND | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | ND | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | ND | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 41 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | D | |
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | D | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | D | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | D | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 53 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | D | |
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | D | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | ND | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | D | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 65 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | D | No alteration |
| B | D | No alteration | |||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | D | No alteration | |
| B | ND | No alteration | |||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | D | No alteration | |
| B | D | No alteration | |||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | ND | No alteration | |
| B | D | No alteration |
‘A’ and ‘B’ represent the two samples observed for each treatment and time of exposure; ‘ND’ means that no significant difference is observed between the shell formed before and during the experiment for the lamellae of the outer shell layer; ‘D’ means that a notable difference is observed between both parts of the shell (i.e. the lamellae are less cohesive).
For the periostracum, ‘no alteration’ means that the periostracum covering the ventral extremity part of the shell is well preserved.
Figure 3Effects of experimental conditions on the ultrastructure of the T. maxima shell outer layer investigated via SEM. (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K, M, N: scale bar, 10 μm; C, F, I, L, O: scale bar, 2 μm). Zone 1 and zone 2 correspond to the shell formed in situ (i.e. before the experiment) and in the experimental conditions, respectively. At 29 days, no significant differences between zones 1 and 2 are observed (A–C: 29.2°C, 430 μatm; D–F: 29.2°C, 1212 μatm). In both zones, lamellae are well cohesive, displaying elongated shape with a smooth surface and slightly rounded outlines. This latter microstructural feature is observed in all shells formed in situ (zone 1), for all temperature/pCO2 conditions and all time of exposure (A, D, G, J, M). At 41 days, lamellae in zone 2 are less cohesive with or without pronounced granular aspect (H, I: 29.2°C, 430 μatm; K, L: 30.7°C, 430 μatm; N, O: 30.7°C, 1212 μatm).
Correlation matrix integrating the different physiological parameters monitored, i.e. O2 production and consumption, shell extension rate and symbiont photosynthetic yield and density
| Photosynthetic yield ( | Symbiont density ( | Shell extension rate ( | O2 production ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbiont density | 0.667* | |||
| Shell extension rate | −0.032 | 0.168 | ||
| O2 production | 0.331* | 0.492* | 0.221 | |
| O2 consumption | 0.163 | 0.226 | 0.129 | 0.629* |
Correlation was tested using the Pearson method (threshold of r = 0.250, α = 0.05) and significant relationships between parameters are indicated by an asterisk (*).