| Literature DB >> 34150209 |
Chloé Brahmi1, Leila Chapron2, Gilles Le Moullac3, Claude Soyez3, Benoît Beliaeff3, Claire E Lazareth4, Nabila Gaertner-Mazouni1, Jeremie Vidal-Dupiol3,5.
Abstract
Many reef organisms, such as the giant clams, are confronted with global change effects. Abnormally high seawater temperatures can lead to mass bleaching events and subsequentEntities:
Keywords: Giant clams; ocean acidification; photosynthetic yield; respiration; symbionts; thermal stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 34150209 PMCID: PMC8208665 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coab041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Measured and calculated parameters of seawater for all treatments
| Treatments | Temperature (°C) |
| pHNBS | Salinity (‰) | AT (μmol/kg SW) | DIC (μmol/kg SW) | Ωaragonite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 29.2 (±0.1) | 428 (±21) | 8.19 (±0.01) | 35 | 2422 (±170) | 2071 (±85) | 4.17 |
| Thermal stress | 30.7 (±0.1) | 431(±25) | 8.19 (±0.01) | 35 | 2409 (±157) | 2051 (±89) | 4.14 |
| Acidification stress | 29.2 (±0.1) | 1210 (±41) | 7.81 (±0.03) | 35 | 2466 (±90) | 2306 (±34) | 1.99 |
| Acidification and thermal stress | 30.7 (±0.1) | 1213 (±29) | 7.81 (±0.03) | 35 | 2423 (±110) | 2252 (±58) | 2.02 |
Total alkalinity (AT) is given in mean (±SD) based on weekly measurements for each experimental tank and for each condition. pCO2, Ωaragonite and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) were calculated using the CO2SYS software.
Figure 1Variations of O2 production and O2 consumption acquired over a 48-h period after 29 days of exposure to different temperature/pCO2 conditions: (A) 29.2°C, 430 μatm of CO2; (B) 30.7°C, 430 μatm of CO2; (C) 29.2°C, 1212 μatm of CO2; and (D) 30.7°C, 1212 μatm of CO2. Data are expressed in mg O2.h−1.g−1 tissue dry weight (dw) and correspond to day-time and night-time acquisitions for four replicates per condition (each color line represents one replicate).
Figure 2Graphs reporting data of (A) oxygen production, (B) oxygen consumption, (C) symbiont photosynthethic yield, (D) symbiont density and (E) daily shell extension rate obtained for each temperature/pCO2 experimental condition and time of exposure (black and grey columns correspond to 430 μatm and 1212 μatm, respectively). Data are given in mean (+SD) calculated from four replicates for all physiological parameters except for daily shell extension rate for which numbers of replicates are specified.
Results from Tukey post hoc tests following the three-way ANOVA performed on analyzed physiological parameters
| O2 production | Photosynthetic yield | Symbiont density | Shell extension rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 29 days | a | a | a | a |
| 41 days | ab | ab | ab | ab | |
| 53 days | ab | ab | b | b | |
| 65 days | b | b | b | b | |
| Temperature | 29.2 °C | a | a | a | - |
| 30.7 °C | b | b | b | - | |
|
| 430 | - | a | a | a |
| 1212 | - | b | b | b | |
| Time × temperature | 29 days × 29.2°C | - | ab | - | - |
| 41 days × 29.2°C | - | a | - | - | |
| 53 days × 29.2°C | - | a | - | - | |
| 65 days × 29.2°C | - | a | - | - | |
| 29 days × 30.7°C | - | cd | - | - | |
| 41 days × 30.7°C | - | abc | - | - | |
| 53 days × 30.7°C | - | bcd | - | - | |
| 65 days × 30.7°C | - | d | - | - |
The effects of significant parameters were tested as time of exposure alone and combined to the temperature.
The letter annotations correspond to the significances between conditions (P < 0.05).
Results from the three-way ANOVA performed on holobiont O2 production and consumption data, symbiont photosynthetic yield, symbiont density and giant clam shell extension rate
| O2 production ( | O2 consumption ( | Photosynthetic yield ( | Symbiont density ( | Shell extension rate ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time |
| 3.264 | 0.740 | 3.566 | 6.035 | 4.695 |
|
| 0.030* | 0.533 | 0.021* | 0.001*** | 0.007** | |
| Temperature |
| 7.551 | 0.294 | 65.200 | 79.158 | 0.466 |
|
| 0.009** | 0.590 | <0.0001*** | <0.0001*** | 0.499 | |
|
|
| 0.846 | 0.851 | 6.125 | 8.665 | 7.409 |
|
| 0.362 | 0.361 | 0.017* | 0.005** | 0.010** | |
| Time × temperature |
| 0.413 | 0.965 | 3.393 | 1.528 | 0.319 |
|
| 0.744 | 0.417 | 0.025* | 0.219 | 0.812 | |
| Time × |
| 1.765 | 0.476 | 0.024 | 1.033 | 0.251 |
|
| 0.167 | 0.700 | 0.995 | 0.386 | 0.860 | |
| Temperature × |
| 1.334 | 1.029 | 0.100 | 1.989 | 0.026 |
|
| 0.254 | 0.315 | 0.753 | 0.165 | 0.872 | |
| Time × temperature x |
| 1.216 | 0.148 | 2.153 | 0.474 | 0.336 |
|
| 0.314 | 0.930 | 0.106 | 0.702 | 0.799 |
The three fixed factors are pCO2, temperature and time of exposure.
Asterisks denote significant differences (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001).
Compilation of ultrastructural observations of lamellae of the shell outer layer and the periostracum using SEM
| Time of exposure | Temperature (°C) |
| Sample | Lamellae of outer shell layer | Periostracum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | ND | |
| B | ND | ||||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | ND | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | ND | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | ND | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 41 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | D | |
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | D | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | D | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | D | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 53 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | D | |
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | D | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | ND | ||
| B | D | ||||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | D | ||
| B | ND | ||||
| 65 days | 29.2 | 430 | A | D | No alteration |
| B | D | No alteration | |||
| 30.7 | 430 | A | D | No alteration | |
| B | ND | No alteration | |||
| 29.2 | 1212 | A | D | No alteration | |
| B | D | No alteration | |||
| 30.7 | 1212 | A | ND | No alteration | |
| B | D | No alteration |
‘A’ and ‘B’ represent the two samples observed for each treatment and time of exposure; ‘ND’ means that no significant difference is observed between the shell formed before and during the experiment for the lamellae of the outer shell layer; ‘D’ means that a notable difference is observed between both parts of the shell (i.e. the lamellae are less cohesive).
For the periostracum, ‘no alteration’ means that the periostracum covering the ventral extremity part of the shell is well preserved.
Figure 3Effects of experimental conditions on the ultrastructure of the T. maxima shell outer layer investigated via SEM. (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K, M, N: scale bar, 10 μm; C, F, I, L, O: scale bar, 2 μm). Zone 1 and zone 2 correspond to the shell formed in situ (i.e. before the experiment) and in the experimental conditions, respectively. At 29 days, no significant differences between zones 1 and 2 are observed (A–C: 29.2°C, 430 μatm; D–F: 29.2°C, 1212 μatm). In both zones, lamellae are well cohesive, displaying elongated shape with a smooth surface and slightly rounded outlines. This latter microstructural feature is observed in all shells formed in situ (zone 1), for all temperature/pCO2 conditions and all time of exposure (A, D, G, J, M). At 41 days, lamellae in zone 2 are less cohesive with or without pronounced granular aspect (H, I: 29.2°C, 430 μatm; K, L: 30.7°C, 430 μatm; N, O: 30.7°C, 1212 μatm).
Correlation matrix integrating the different physiological parameters monitored, i.e. O2 production and consumption, shell extension rate and symbiont photosynthetic yield and density
| Photosynthetic yield ( | Symbiont density ( | Shell extension rate ( | O2 production ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbiont density | 0.667* | |||
| Shell extension rate | −0.032 | 0.168 | ||
| O2 production | 0.331* | 0.492* | 0.221 | |
| O2 consumption | 0.163 | 0.226 | 0.129 | 0.629* |
Correlation was tested using the Pearson method (threshold of r = 0.250, α = 0.05) and significant relationships between parameters are indicated by an asterisk (*).