Yan Sun1, Haiyan Luo2. 1. Department of Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang Lianyungang, China. 2. Department of Neoursurgery, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang Lianyungang, China.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the effect of systematic nursing on patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding and rehabilitation. Methods: 98 patients who were treated in our hospital for dysfunctional uterine bleeding from May 2017 to May 2019 were selected, and were divided into a control group (n=49, conventional nursing) and an observation group (n=49, systematic nursing) according to the random number table method. The curative effect, uterine bleeding time, normalization time of biochemical index recovery, psychologic status, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results: The efficacy rate of the observation group (93.88%) was higher than the control group (77.55%); the observation group had less uterine bleeding time and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in comparison with the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05); after intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of both groups decreased, with the observation group being more significant (P<0.05. The quality of life score and nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group were higher (P<0.05). Conclusion:Systematic nursing can improve the curative effect of patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding, accelerate the rehabilitation process, relieve negative emotions, and improve the quality of life and nursing satisfaction. AJTR
RCT Entities:
Purpose: To study the effect of systematic nursing on patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding and rehabilitation. Methods: 98 patients who were treated in our hospital for dysfunctional uterine bleeding from May 2017 to May 2019 were selected, and were divided into a control group (n=49, conventional nursing) and an observation group (n=49, systematic nursing) according to the random number table method. The curative effect, uterine bleeding time, normalization time of biochemical index recovery, psychologic status, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results: The efficacy rate of the observation group (93.88%) was higher than the control group (77.55%); the observation group had less uterine bleeding time and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in comparison with the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05); after intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of both groups decreased, with the observation group being more significant (P<0.05. The quality of life score and nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group were higher (P<0.05). Conclusion: Systematic nursing can improve the curative effect of patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding, accelerate the rehabilitation process, relieve negative emotions, and improve the quality of life and nursing satisfaction. AJTR
Authors: T Justin Clark; Lee J Middleton; Natalie Am Cooper; Lavanya Diwakar; Elaine Denny; Paul Smith; Laura Gennard; Lynda Stobert; Tracy E Roberts; Versha Cheed; Tracey Bingham; Sue Jowett; Elizabeth Brettell; Mary Connor; Sian E Jones; Jane P Daniels Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Allison G Close; Gina M Sequeira; Gerald T Montano; Lauren J Alessi; Meghan C McCormick; James D Cooper; Rebecca A Epperly; Noel S Zuckerbraun Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 1.814