Hailing Sun1, Hongdi Lin2, Haifei Ye2. 1. Party and Government Office, Zhoushan Women and Children Hospital Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang Province, China. 2. Department of Gynecology, Zhoushan Women and Children Hospital Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the improvement of quality of life of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease by comprehensive nursing intervention. METHODS: Altogether 118 patients with pelvic inflammatory disease admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to December 2019 were obtained and grouped into the control group (CG) and the experimental group (EG). The CG was given routine nursing and the EG was given comprehensive nursing intervention. The clinical efficacy, changes of serum inflammatory factors, negative emotion scores, treatment compliance and quality of life of the two groups were compared. The satisfaction of nursing care of patients in two groups was counted. RESULTS: The total effective rate of treatment in the EG was evidently higher than that in the CG. Before nursing, there was no significant difference in serum inflammatory factors, SDS and SAS scores and quality of life scores between the two groups (P<0.05). After nursing intervention, the levels of serum inflammatory factors, SDS and SAS scores and quality of life scores in the EG were evidently better than those in the CG, and their satisfaction with nursing was evidently higher than that in the CG (all P< 0.05). CONCLUSION:Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve the quality of life of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease, and as such it is worth popularizing. AJTR
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To explore the improvement of quality of life of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease by comprehensive nursing intervention. METHODS: Altogether 118 patients with pelvic inflammatory disease admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to December 2019 were obtained and grouped into the control group (CG) and the experimental group (EG). The CG was given routine nursing and the EG was given comprehensive nursing intervention. The clinical efficacy, changes of serum inflammatory factors, negative emotion scores, treatment compliance and quality of life of the two groups were compared. The satisfaction of nursing care of patients in two groups was counted. RESULTS: The total effective rate of treatment in the EG was evidently higher than that in the CG. Before nursing, there was no significant difference in serum inflammatory factors, SDS and SAS scores and quality of life scores between the two groups (P<0.05). After nursing intervention, the levels of serum inflammatory factors, SDS and SAS scores and quality of life scores in the EG were evidently better than those in the CG, and their satisfaction with nursing was evidently higher than that in the CG (all P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve the quality of life of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease, and as such it is worth popularizing. AJTR
Authors: Ann E Wiringa; Roberta B Ness; Toni Darville; Richard H Beigi; Catherine L Haggerty Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.519