Literature DB >> 34150120

The value of coronary CTA in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Li Ru1, Pengxun Lan1, Chengcheng Xu2, Lingling Lu1, Ting Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the detection of coronary artery disease.
METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, 150 patients with suspected coronary artery disease admitted to the Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University were recruited as the research cohort for this study. All the patients underwent a coronary CTA and a coronary angiography. The results of the patients' coronary CTAs and coronary angiographies were compared. Analyses were performed on the practical implications of coronary CTA in the detection of coronary artery disease and the detection and coincidence rates of coronary CTA for determining the severity of coronary stenosis.
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in the detection of positive results of coronary artery diseases or the identification of coronary stenosis between the coronary CTAs and the coronary angiographies. The sensitivity of coronary CTA in the examination of coronary artery diseases was 81.8%. The specificity was 87.5%, the negative predictive value was 63.6%, and the positive predictive value was 94.7%. In contrast to the coronary angiography, the coincidence rates of coronary CTA for determining the location of coronary lesions were 89.1% for LAD lesions, 80.0% for LCX lesions, and 100% for RCA lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary CTA has a significant value in the detection of coronary artery diseases, as it can accurately examine the severity of coronary stenoses and locate the sites of the stenotic lesions. It is worthy of clinical use. AJTR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; coronary angiography; coronary computed tomography angiography; diagnosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34150120      PMCID: PMC8205783     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  26 in total

1.  Classification for Assessing the Quality of Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Philippe Généreux; Roxana Mehran; Martin B Leon; Nicolas Bettinger; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  Effect of the Presence and Type of Angina on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease Referred for Elective Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  John P Vavalle; Lan Shen; Samuel Broderick; Linda K Shaw; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Revascularization for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: The Courage to Use What We Have Learned.

Authors:  Alice K Jacobs; Ashvin N Pande
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 4.  A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics.

Authors:  Arup Kr Malakar; Debashree Choudhury; Binata Halder; Prosenjit Paul; Arif Uddin; Supriyo Chakraborty
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Tiziano Schepis; Lars Husmann; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  What is the role of invasive versus non-invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of patients suspected to have coronary heart disease?

Authors:  C K Chow; T Sheth
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  Prevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; David Dai; Adrian F Hernandez; Pamela S Douglas; John Messenger; Kirk N Garratt; Thomas M Maddox; Eric D Peterson; Matthew T Roe
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Clinical presentation and management of stable coronary artery disease in Austria.

Authors:  Otto Pichlhöfer; Manfred Maier; Roza Badr-Eslam; Robin Ristl; Magdalena Zebrowska; Irene M Lang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris: influence on downstream rate of invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Jesper Møller Jensen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Ole Norling Mathiassen; Erik Lerkevang Grove; Kristian Altern Øvrehus; Kamilla Bech Pedersen; Christian Juhl Terkelsen; Evald Høj Christiansen; Michael Maeng; Jonathon Leipsic; Anne Kaltoft; Lars Jakobsen; Jacob Thorsted Sørensen; Troels Thim; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Lars Romer Krusell; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Comparison of coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging with fractional flow reserve for coronary artery disease evaluation: An anatomical-functional mismatch.

Authors:  Julien Adjedj; Nikolay Stoyanov; Olivier Muller
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.596

View more
  1 in total

1.  Correlation of Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Effect of Standardized Rehabilitation Nursing.

Authors:  Mingming Liu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.