Literature DB >> 34150109

A study of the clinical application value of ultrasound and electrocardiogram in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathy.

Yanyan Zhao1, Shibin Lin1, Jingjing Wu1, Jineng Lai1, Lan Li1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical application values of electrocardiogram (ECG) combined with ultrasound cardiogram (UCG) in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients with cardiomyopathy who were admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into the dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) group (60 cases) and the ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) group (60 cases). Both groups were examined using ECG combined with UCG. The ultrasonic values (aorta, LADI, LVDd, LVESD, RVID, SV, LVEF, LVET, EPSS, E/A, RV6, RV6/RMAX), morphological changes (thin and round left ventricular apex, spherical left ventricle, arch-shaped left ventricle, segmental wall-motion abnormalities (SWMAs), diffuse wall motion abnormalities (DWMAs), paradoxical ventricular wall motion) and heart valve regurgitation (aortic valve, mitral valve, tricuspid valve, pulmonary valve) were compared and analyzed.
RESULTS: The degree of chamber enlargement in the DCM group was remarkably higher than that in the ICM group, but the degree of LVEF and aortic enlargement were significantly lower than those in the ICM group (P<0.05). The detection rates of spherical left ventricle and DWMAs in the DCM group were 60.00% and 100.00% respectively, which was significantly higher than those (6.66% and 40.00%) of the ICM group (P<0.05), but the detection rates of thin and round left ventricular apex, arch-shaped left ventricle, SWMAs, and paradoxical ventricular wall motion were 53.33%, 66.66%, 46.66% and 20.00% respectively in the ICM group, which were markedly higher than those in the DCM group. The incidence rates of aortic valve, mitral valve, tricuspid valve and pulmonary valve in the DCM group were 66.66%, 100.00%, 46.66% and 76.66%, which were notably higher than those (36.66%, 93.33%, 26.66% and 40.00%) in the ICM group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: ECG combined with UCG examination can effectively improve the judgment rate and diagnosis accuracy of cardiomyopathy. Due to its high safety, ECG combined with UCG examination is worthy of clinical promotion and application. AJTR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiomyopathy; electrocardiogram; ultrasound cardiogram

Year:  2021        PMID: 34150109      PMCID: PMC8205793     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  24 in total

1.  Analysis of Patients with Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum.

Authors:  Muharrem Çakmak; Melih Yüksel; Mehmet Nail Kandemir
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2016-07-01

2.  Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography.

Authors:  Leyla Acu; Suna Özhan Oktar; Rusen Acu; Cem Yücel; Süleyman Cebeci
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Real time three-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of ventricular volumes, mass, and function in children with congenital and acquired heart diseases.

Authors:  Rula Balluz; Liwen Liu; Xiaodong Zhou; Shuping Ge
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.724

4.  Accuracy of the ECG for differential diagnosis between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and athlete's heart: comparison between the European Society of Cardiology (2010) and International (2017) criteria.

Authors:  Alessandro Zorzi; Chiara Calore; Riccardo Vio; Antonio Pelliccia; Domenico Corrado
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Tachyarrhythmias and Bradyarrhythmias: Differential Diagnosis and Initial Management in the Primary Care Office.

Authors:  Timothy Joseph Byrnes; Otto Costantini
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.456

6.  A decision support system and rule-based algorithm to augment the human interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Andrew W Cairns; Raymond R Bond; Dewar D Finlay; Daniel Guldenring; Fabio Badilini; Guido Libretti; Aaron J Peace; Stephen J Leslie
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  Triple rule-out CT in patients with suspicion of acute pulmonary embolism: findings and accuracy.

Authors:  Thomas Schertler; Thomas Frauenfelder; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Borut Marincek; Vladimir Kaplan; Nils Kucher; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary anatomy obtained by multi-detector computed tomography: an ex vivo contribution.

Authors:  Paulo Donato; P Coelho; C Santos; A Bernardes; F Caseiro-Alves
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  The differential diagnostic value of serum homocysteine for white coat hypertension.

Authors:  Shitian Guo; Hui Lin; Sunlei Pan; Xiaoya Zhai; Liping Meng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-18

10.  Focal Myopericarditis as a Rare but Important Differential Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction; a Case Series.

Authors:  Younes Nozari; Masih Tajdini; Mehdi Mehrani; Rosa Ghaderpanah
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2016
View more
  3 in total

1.  Platelet-Membrane-Encapsulated Carvedilol with Improved Targeting Ability for Relieving Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Tingting Zhou; Xuechao Yang; Tianyi Wang; Mingming Xu; Zhanghao Huang; Runze Yu; Yi Jiang; Youlang Zhou; Jiahai Shi
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Application of CT Imaging in Differential Diagnosis and Nursing of Endocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Xue Jiang; Weiwei Xu; Ying Zhao
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.009

3.  Clinical Analysis of Echocardiography and Serum IL-6 and TNF-α Changes in Pregnant Women with Hypertension.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Xiaolin Hou; Mei Yu; Jin Zhou
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 1.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.