Literature DB >> 34149833

Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Daniele Bernardi1, Emanuele Asti1, Giulia Bonavina2, Alberto Luporini3, Claudio Clemente4, Luigi Bonavina5.   

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer may present with distinct cutaneous manifestations that may be paraneoplastic or secondary to direct skin infiltration, distant skin metastases, or dermal lymphatic tumor embolization (inflammatory breast carcinoma). Case report: A 51-year-old Asian woman visited the emergency care department during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Northern Italy. About 6 months before, she had noted the onset of right breast swelling accompanied by skin redness and itching. She never consulted a physician, and, over time, the local skin condition progressed to a large scaly plaque covering the entire breast surface including the nipple. At presentation, abduction of the right upper limb was impaired due to severe shoulder pain. CT scan showed the presence of bilateral breast masses with necrotic and colliquative features, and multiple skeletal, nodal, pulmonary, and brain images suggestive of metastases. An ultrasound-guided core biopsy of the contralateral breast showed grade 2 non-special type infiltrating carcinoma. The patient was referred to the breast oncology unit and is currently being treated with aromatase inhibitors and chemotherapy.
Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the entire spectrum of oncological care including breast cancer. Hopefully, telemedicine will contribute to increase patients' confidence and will provide earlier diagnosis and treatment while minimizing the risk of contagion. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast cancer screening; Paget disease; Paraneoplastic dermatosis; Skin metastases

Year:  2021        PMID: 34149833      PMCID: PMC8204297          DOI: 10.1007/s10353-021-00726-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Surg        ISSN: 1682-1769            Impact factor:   0.796


Main novel aspects

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the health care system worldwide, causing delayed oncological care. An Asian woman presented with late-stage inflammatory breast carcinoma with impressive skin changes.

Introduction

Breast carcinoma is the most common malignancy leading to skin metastasis in women. The overall reported rate is as high as 24%, but only 3% of patients present with cutaneous metastasis as the initial sign of the disease. Skin nodules from primary breast cancer are the most common clinical presentation and represent the most common metastases diagnosed by dermatologists [1]. Tumor cells can reach the skin through direct invasion or through hematogenous or lymphatic spread. Inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer, accounts for less than 5% of cases, and dermal lymphatic involvement represents the essential feature. Because of its rarity, IBC is often misdiagnosed as mastitis [2]. On the other hand, a variety of paraneoplastic dermatoses may lead to incidental diagnosis of associated breast cancer [3]. We report the case of metastatic breast carcinoma with local cutaneous involvement that was diagnosed during the first peak of COVID-19 outbreak in Northern Italy.

Case report

A 51-year-old Asian woman presented to the emergency department on May 6, 2020, during the lockdown for the COVID-19 outbreak. She was nulliparous, a working immigrant, with low educational level, living with her husband. About 6 months previously, she had noted the onset of right breast swelling with skin redness and itching. This condition progressively worsened, causing major discomfort and associated shoulder pain with reduced mobility of the shoulder and right arm. The patient did not seek any medical consultation, as she did not trust her general practitioner and was ashamed and feared of visiting hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. At physical examination, the entire skin surface of the right breast including the nipple was replaced by a large scaly plaque with areas of yellow-brown crusting alternated with the presence of fibrin and serous secretions. The edges of this large skin lesion were erythematous and edematous, with subcutaneous swelling extended from the right clavicle to the ipsilateral flank (Fig. 1). Hard consistency tissue was palpable in the left breast. Blood analysis showed anemia (Hb 8.1 g/dL), leukocytosis (21.30 × 10^3 μL), and increased C‑reactive protein (13.2 mg/dL). Multi-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from two different skin swabs, and therapy with daptomycin was initiated. The SARS-CoV‑2 polymerase chain reaction test was negative. A chest CT scan showed the presence of bilateral breast masses, the largest in the right breast (98 × 52 mm) with necrotic and colliquative features, and enlarged nodes visible in the right axilla. In addition, there were multiple bone metastases involving the sternum and, on the right hemisoma, the first rib, scapula, and humerus (Fig. 2a,b); a right pleural effusion; and left pulmonary metastases (Fig. 2b,c). A head CT scan showed multiple metastatic brain lesions and skull erosion (Fig. 3a,b).
Fig. 1

Extensive skin changes overlying the right breast (a, b). Details of the scaly patches (c)

Fig. 2

Computed tomography scan showing bilateral breast masses, the largest in the right breast (98 × 52 mm) with necrotic and colliquative features (a); sternum and rib invasion (b); enlargement of axillary nodes (c); scapula and humerus head invasion (d). White arrows indicate the sites of metastasis

Fig. 3

Head CT scan showing skull erosion and multiple brain metastases. White arrows indicate the sites of metastasis

Extensive skin changes overlying the right breast (a, b). Details of the scaly patches (c) Computed tomography scan showing bilateral breast masses, the largest in the right breast (98 × 52 mm) with necrotic and colliquative features (a); sternum and rib invasion (b); enlargement of axillary nodes (c); scapula and humerus head invasion (d). White arrows indicate the sites of metastasis Head CT scan showing skull erosion and multiple brain metastases. White arrows indicate the sites of metastasis An ultrasound-guided core biopsy of the left breast was performed, and histology showed a non-special type (NST) infiltrating carcinoma, grade 2 according to the Elston–Ellis modification of the original Scarff–Bloom–Richardson (SBR) system ([4]; Fig. 4a, b, c). Estrogen receptors (ER) were positive (Fig. 4d), while progesterone receptors (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (c-erbB2) were negative (Fig. 4e); Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was positive (80%; Fig. 4f).
Fig. 4

a, b Non-special type (NST) infiltrating carcinoma of the left breast. a Core biopsy. b In the central area infiltrating carcinoma, at left necrosis and at right fibroadenomatoid mastopathy. c Immunohistochemical anti-cadherin antibody positivity of the central neoplastic cells and in the ductal cells of fibroadenomatoid mastopathy; a cross-chromogen reactivity of the necrotic area. d Immunohistochemical positivity to estrogen anti-receptor serum with weak positivity even in the ductal cells of fibroadenomatoid mastopathy (positive internal control). e Immunohistochemical negativity to the progesterone serum with focal (red circle) positivity in the ductal cells of fibroadenomatoid mastopathy (positive internal control). f Ki67 immunohistochemical positive stain in the central area of carcinoma and negative ductal cells in fibroadenomatoid mastopathy and in the necrotic area

a, b Non-special type (NST) infiltrating carcinoma of the left breast. a Core biopsy. b In the central area infiltrating carcinoma, at left necrosis and at right fibroadenomatoid mastopathy. c Immunohistochemical anti-cadherin antibody positivity of the central neoplastic cells and in the ductal cells of fibroadenomatoid mastopathy; a cross-chromogen reactivity of the necrotic area. d Immunohistochemical positivity to estrogen anti-receptor serum with weak positivity even in the ductal cells of fibroadenomatoid mastopathy (positive internal control). e Immunohistochemical negativity to the progesterone serum with focal (red circle) positivity in the ductal cells of fibroadenomatoid mastopathy (positive internal control). f Ki67 immunohistochemical positive stain in the central area of carcinoma and negative ductal cells in fibroadenomatoid mastopathy and in the necrotic area The patient was referred to the breast oncology unit with a presumptive diagnosis of IBC, and treatment with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (letrozole 2.5 mg per oral/daily) and chemotherapy with cyclin-dependent kinase CDK 4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib 125 mg per oral/daily) was initiated.

Discussion

The COVID-19 outbreak has caused severe disruption in national health care systems, including suspended screening programs and delayed breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. It has been reported that delays up to 3–6 months in breast cancer diagnosis are associated with lower survival [5, 6]. The diagnostic delay may be attributed to patients’ refractoriness in accessing medical care and/or system delay in providing medical consultation and a definitive diagnosis. Although the oncological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has yet to be fully analyzed, it is likely that an increased rate of more advanced breast cancers will be discovered over time and major efforts are required to reorganize screening programs and to address a rising rate of elective cancer operations [7, 8]. Nonetheless, despite the fact that the workload for breast cancer has been high during the pandemic peak in Northern Italy, hubs have allowed the continuation of oncologic treatments, especially radiotherapy, while mitigating the burden on frontline COVID-19 hospitals [9]. In our patient, the impressive clinical presentation with extensive skin changes covering the entire right breast was likely due to permeation of skin lymphatics by metastatic emboli similar to what is seen in late-stage inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) [2]. Unfortunately, no skin punch biopsy nor core biopsy of the underlying parenchymal lesion was performed. Paget’s disease and a paraneoplastic ichthyosis-like dermatosis were reasonably excluded because skin changes were limited to the breast surface and involvement of the nipple occurred late in the clinical course of the disease. It is estimated that 1–3% of all breast cancers present with the features of IBC involving the dermal lymphatic vessels, and about 40% of these patients have stage IV disease with synchronous distant metastases [10]. Inflammatory breast cancer is characterized by aggressive clinical behavior with rapid disease progression, and is a distinct biological entity rather than a subtype of locally advanced breast cancer. Among the risk factors for IBC are African ethnicity, high body mass index, and younger age at disease onset. A multimodal approach can significantly improve patients’ outcomes if started early in the course of the disease, and systemic therapy should be followed by radiotherapy and/or mastectomy. Unfortunately, IBC is frequently misdiagnosed as mastitis and patients may receive several courses of antibiotics before receiving the correct diagnosis [2]. Magnetic resonance imaging is a highly accurate and important diagnostic and staging tool in patients with potential IBC [11, 12]. More than half of patients exhibit an estrogen receptor-negative tumor, and about one third of these patients present with triple-negative tumors [2]. Of note, the diffuse pattern of ductal breast carcinoma of no special type (NST) [13] is largely underrecognized and rarely reported in the literature. Overall, based on morphology and E‑cadherin expression, about 20% of patients with diffuse-type tumors are NST and have a poor survival irrespective of the molecular phenotype [14, 15].

Conclusion

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the reduced ability to offer face-to-face medical consultation has been switched to teleconsultation in many countries. Hopefully, the rapid diffusion of telemedicine driven by the pandemic will contribute to increase patients’ confidence and limit the collateral damage secondary to health care prioritization and resources reallocation, while minimizing the risk of contagion [5]. This may provide reassurance and trust to many women, and may offer to others the chance to be diagnosed and treated at an earlier disease stage.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A Richards; A M Westcombe; S B Love; P Littlejohns; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Dermatosis as the Initial Manifestation of Malignant Breast Tumors: Retrospective Analysis of 4 Cases.

Authors:  Ying-Jie Song; Yun-Fei Wu; Tao Fan
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Multifocal breast cancer documented in large-format histology sections: long-term follow-up results by molecular phenotypes.

Authors:  Gyula Pekar; Syster Hofmeyer; László Tabár; Miklós Tarján; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Dan Hellberg; Mária Gere; Tibor Tot
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Cutaneous manifestations of breast cancer.

Authors:  Antoinette R Tan
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment.

Authors:  Fredika M Robertson; Melissa Bondy; Wei Yang; Hideko Yamauchi; Shannon Wiggins; Samira Kamrudin; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Huong Le-Petross; Luc Bidaut; Audrey N Player; Sanford H Barsky; Wendy A Woodward; Thomas Buchholz; Anthony Lucci; Naoto T Ueno; Naoto Ueno; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Diffuse invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

Authors:  Tibor Tot
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Coronavirus-Era: Alert From Italy.

Authors:  Gianluca Vanni; Marco Pellicciaro; Marco Materazzo; Leonardo Palombi; Oreste Claudio Buonomo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  A Sud; M E Jones; J Broggio; C Loveday; B Torr; A Garrett; D L Nicol; S Jhanji; S A Boyce; F Gronthoud; P Ward; J M Handy; N Yousaf; J Larkin; Y-E Suh; S Scott; P D P Pharoah; C Swanton; C Abbosh; M Williams; G Lyratzopoulos; R Houlston; C Turnbull
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Metastatic behavior and overall survival according to breast cancer subtypes in stage IV inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  D J P van Uden; M C van Maaren; L J A Strobbe; P Bult; J J van der Hoeven; S Siesling; J H W de Wilt; C F J M Blanken-Peeters
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Breast Adjuvant Radiotherapy Amid the COVID-19 Crisis in a Hub Cancer Center, Lombardy, Italy.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Leonardi; Emilia Montagna; Viviana Enrica Galimberti; Mattia Zaffaroni; Damaris Patricia Rojas; Samantha Dicuonzo; Maria Alessia Zerella; Anna Morra; Claudia Sangalli; Sara Gandini; Marco Colleoni; Paolo Veronesi; Marianna Alessandra Gerardi; Daniela Alterio; Roberta Lazzari; Massimo Sarra Fiore; Giammaria Bufi; Federica Cattani; Fabrizio Mastrilli; Roberto Orecchia; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Research trends and hotspots of breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Lyu; Jing-Tai Li; Tang Deng; Guang-Xun Lin; Ping-Ming Fan; Xu-Chen Cao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.