| Literature DB >> 34149419 |
Delong Chen1,2, Qingqing Wang3, Ying Li4, Ping Sun5, Vincent Kuek2, Jinbo Yuan2, Junzheng Yang6, Longfei Wen1, Haibin Wang7, Jiake Xu2, Peng Chen7.
Abstract
Integrity of <span class="Chemical">the skeleton is sustained <span class="Chemical">through the balanced activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in bone remodeling unit. The balance can be disrupted by excessive osteoclasts activation commonly seen in osteoporosis. Notopterol (NOT) is a main component of Notopterygium incisum which exerts a wide spectrum effect on biomedical pharmacology. In our study, we found NOT serves as an inhibitor in regulating RANKL-activated osteoclasts formation and bone resorption function by calculating tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAcP) staining and hydroxyapatite resorption assays. Furthermore, RANKL-mediated signaling pathways including MAPK, NF-κB and calcium ossification were hampered, whereas ROS scavenging enzymes in Nrf2/Keap1/ARE signaling pathways were promoted by NOT. In addition, the activation of the essential transcription factor NFATc1 in RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis was almost totally suppressed by NOT. What is more, NOT diminished the loss of bone mass in preclinical model of OVX mice by blocking osteoclastogenesis determined by bone histomorphometry, TRAcP staining and H&E staining. Conclusively, our findings demonstrated that NOT could arrest osteoclastogenesis and bone resorptive activity by attenuating RANKL-mediated MAPK, NF-κB, calcium and NFATc1 signaling transduction pathways and enhancing ROS scavenging enzymes in Nrf2/Keap1/ARE pathways in vitro, and prohibit bone loss induced by OVX in vivo. Taken together, NOT may be identified to be a natural and novel treatment for osteolytic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: ROS; nfatc1; notopterol; osteoclastogenesis; osteoporosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34149419 PMCID: PMC8210423 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.664836
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Notopterol inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in vitro. (A) Chemical structure of Notopterol. (B) Effect of indicated concentrations Notopterol on viability of BMMs as measured by MTS assay. (C) Representative light microscope images of RANKL-induced osteoclast formation treated with indicated concentrations of Notopterol for 5 days (Scale bar = 200 μm). (D) Quantification of TRAcP-positive multinucleated cells (nuclei >3) treated with indicated concentrations of Notopterol. (E) Representative confocal images of mature osteoclasts stained for F-actin belts and nuclei (Scale bar = 200 μm). (F) Quantification of the average number of nuclei involved in TRAcP-positive multinucleated cells. (G) Quantification of the area of F-actin belts occupied by osteoclasts per field. “−” means RANKL untreated; “+” means RANKL treated. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All in vitro experiments were repeated three times with similar results. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 relative to RANKL-induced controls.
FIGURE 2Notopterol suppresses osteoclast hydroxyapatite resorption and expression of osteoclast marker genes. (A) Representative images of the hydroxyapatite surface after removal of osteoclasts with corresponding TRAcP-stained osteoclasts. Scale bar = 200 μm. Representative images showing the effect of 10 μM Notopterol treatment on indicated days. (B) Quantification of TRAcP-positive multinucleated cells (nuclei >3). (C) Quantification of the percentage area of hydroxyapatite surface resorbed per osteoclast. qRT-PCR analysis was performed to detect osteoclast-specific genes Acp5 (D), Calcitonin receptor (E), V-ATPase-d2 (F) and Ctsk (G). The expression levels of these genes were normalized to the expression of Hprt1. “−” means RANKL untreated; “+” means RANKL treated; Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All in vitro experiments were repeated three times with similar results. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 relative to RANKL-induced controls.
FIGURE 3Notopterol abrogates RANKL-induced NFATc1 activation and associated downstream protein expression. (A,B) Representative confocal images (A) and quantification analysis (B) indicated that NFATc1 protein expression activated by RANKL was strikingly hampered by Notopterol. Scale bar = 200 μm. (C) RAW 264.7 cells transfected with an NFATc1 luciferase construct were pre-treated with indicated concentrations of Notopterol, followed by RANKL (50 ng/ml) stimulation for 24 h. NFATc1 luciferase activity was measured with a luciferase reporter assay system. (D) Representative images of Western blotting reflecting the effects of Notopterol on NFATc1, MMP9, c-Fos, CTSK induced by RANKL. (E–H) The ratios of band intensity of NFATc1 (E), MMP9 (F), c-Fos (G), CTSK (H) relative to β-actin were quantitatively determined. “−” means RANKL untreated; “+” means RANKL treated. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All in vitro experiments were repeated three times with similar results. Significant differences between the control and treatment groups are shown as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4Notopterol represses NF-κB, MAPK activation and calcium oscillation during osteoclastogenesis. (A,B) Representative Western blotting images (A) and quantification analysis (B) of IκB-α from BMMs which were induced with M-CSF and RANKL in the presence of NOT (10 μM). (C) Luciferase activity in RANKL stimulated RAW264.7 cells transfected with an NF-κB luciferase construct. NF-κB luciferase activation was decreased following exposure to various concentration of Notopterol. (D) Representative images of western blots suggesting the expression level of p-JNK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 normalized to JNK1/2 and ERK1/2. (E,F) Quantitative analysis of the fold change in p-JNK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 expression after Notopterol treatment. (G–J) Representative images of Ca2+ oscillation pattern stimulated by RANKL (G), negative control (M-CSF only) (H), 10 μM Notopterol treatment prior to RANKL stimulation (I). (J) Quantification of intensity of Ca2+ oscillation captured across multiple cells for each condition and maximum peak intensity minus baseline intensity (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All in vitro experiments were repeated three times with similar results. Significant differences between the control and treatment groups are shown as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5Notopterol suppresses RANKL-induced ROS generation and enhances ROS scavenging enzymes expression. (A) Representative confocal images of RANKL-induced ROS generation in cells with or without the addition of NOT. (B) Quantification of the average number of ROS-positive cells per field (n = 3). (C) Antioxidant response element luciferase activity was lifted with the higher Notopterol concentration indicated by analyzing luciferase assay. (D–H) qRT-PCR analysis was conducted to determine the expression of ROS scavenging enzymes including Nrf2 (D), Nrf2/Keap1 (E), Gsr (F), NQO1 (G) and catalase (H). The expression levels of these genes were normalized to the expression of Hprt1. (I–K) The protein expression of catalase and HO-1 after treatment by Notopterol (5 and 10 μM) with or without RANKL (50 ng/ml). The statistical significance of differences in protein expression among the four groups was analyzed. The expression of the above proteins was determined relative to β-actin expression. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All in vitro experiments were repeated three times with similar results. Significant differences between the control and treatment groups are shown as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 6Notopterol treatment prevents bone loss in OVX-induced mice in vivo. (A) Representative 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional reconstruction micro-CT images of trabecular bone microarchitecture in the different groups. Trabecular bone was analyzed by micro-CT in sham-operated, ovariectomized mice after vehicle or Notopterol treatment (10 μM). (B–E) Trabecular bone volume/tissue volume fraction (B), trabecular number (C), trabecular thickness (D) were dramatically up-regulated after exposure to Notopterol. Trabecular separation has no obvious difference among these groups (E). (F) Representative 3-dimensional reconstructed region of cortical bone suggested no difference among three groups in the femur. Cortical bone area (G), total tissue area (H), cortical area fraction (I) as well as cortical thickness (J) were also less different in the absent or present Notopterol groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 5 per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 relative to the OVX group.
FIGURE 7Notopterol ameliorates OVX-induced bone loss by suppressing osteoclast activity. (A) Representative images of decalcified bone stained with TRAcP and H and E in sham-treated, OVX, OVX + Notopterol (10 mg/kg) groups. Scale bar = 500 μm; Scale bar = 100 μm (TRAcP) and Scale bar = 200 μm (H and E) in the enlarge pictures. (B–C) Quantitative analysis of osteoclast surface/bone surface (B) and bone volume/total volume (C) in tissue sections. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 per group. Significant differences between the control and treatment groups are shown as **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 8A schematic diagram for illustrating the role of Notopterol in repressing RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis through inhibition of NF-κB, MAPK and calcium signaling pathways as well as promotion of ROS scavenging enzymes.