Literature DB >> 34149215

New Innovation: Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring for Evaluating Glycaemic Variability, Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Utility in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.

Saxena Pikee1, Kumari Khushbu1, Prakash Anupam2, Puri Manju1, Jain Sachin2.   

Abstract

AIM: Application of Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system to evaluate glycaemic variability (GV), patient satisfaction and clinical utility in pregnant women with diabetes.
METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on 70 pregnant women with diabetes where blood sugar levels were monitored by FGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).
RESULTS: FGM generated 19,950 readings versus 1470 readings by SMBG over 3 days. Glucose values measured by FGM and SMBG had significant positive correlation (r > 0.89; p < 0.001). Significant difference (p < 0.001) was present between minimum glucose values by FGM (52.49 ± 15.42 mg/dl) and SMBG (72.74 ± 18.30 mg/dl). FGM (20.9%) was able to pick exact duration of hypoglycaemia, while one-third of this duration was missed by conventional SMBG (14.7%; p < 0.05). Hypoglycaemic episodes were observed in 92.9% women by FGM as compared to 45.7% by SMBG (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in maximum glucose level or duration of hyperglycaemia by both methods. FGM identified hyperglycaemia in 74% women vs. 52% by SMBG (p < 0.001). GV calculated by using MODD by FGM was 118.4 ± 52.4 mg/dl and by SMBG was 83.2 ± 53.2 mg/dl (p < 0.001). 100% women preferred AGP vs. SMBG.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate FGM for GV and patient satisfaction in women with GDM. Significant correlation was observed in glucose values by FGM and SMBG. FGM was more sensitive in detecting GV and hypoglycaemic excursions as compared to SMBG. All women preferred FGM over SMBG. Use of FGM gave new insights in clinical management of challenging cases. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes in pregnancy; FGM; Glycaemic variability; SMBG

Year:  2021        PMID: 34149215      PMCID: PMC8167017          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-020-01391-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  12 in total

1.  Translating glucose variability metrics into the clinic via Continuous Glucose Monitoring: a Graphical User Interface for Diabetes Evaluation (CGM-GUIDE©).

Authors:  Renata A Rawlings; Hang Shi; Lo-Hua Yuan; William Brehm; Rodica Pop-Busui; Patrick W Nelson
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Hypoglycaemia in diabetes.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.781

3.  Continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kirsimarja K Kestilä; Ulla U Ekblad; Tapani Rönnemaa
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 4.  Glycemic risk factors of diabetic vascular complications: the role of glycemic variability.

Authors:  Francesco Zaccardi; Dario Pitocco; Giovanni Ghirlanda
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.876

5.  Continuous glucose monitoring for the evaluation and improved control of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  R Chen; Y Yogev; A Ben-Haroush; L Jovanovic; M Hod; M Phillip
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-10

6.  Continuous glucose monitoring effects on maternal glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fan Yu; Lijuan Lv; Zhijiang Liang; Yi Wang; Jiying Wen; Xiaohong Lin; Yuheng Zhou; Caiyuan Mai; Jianmin Niu
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Pregnancy outcome of women with gestational diabetes in a tertiary level hospital of north India.

Authors:  Pikee Saxena; Swati Tyagi; Anupam Prakash; Aruna Nigam; Shubha Sagar Trivedi
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2011-04

8.  Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Helen R Murphy; Gerry Rayman; Karen Lewis; Susan Kelly; Balroop Johal; Katherine Duffield; Duncan Fowler; Peter J Campbell; Rosemary C Temple
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-25

Review 9.  Glycemic Variability: How Do We Measure It and Why Is It Important?

Authors:  Sunghwan Suh; Jae Hyeon Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.376

10.  Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as an educational tool for patients with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Eman Alfadhli; Eman Osman; Taghreed Basri
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.320

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.