Sarah Forthal1, Sugy Choi1,2, Rajeev Yerneni1, Zhongjie Zhang1, David Siscovick3, Natalia Egorova4, Todor Mijanovich5, Victoria Mayer4,6, Charles Neighbors1,7. 1. Department of Data Science, Partnership to End Addiction*, New York, NY. 2. Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 3. New York Academy of Medicine. 4. Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. 5. Department of Applied Statistics, Social Science, and Humanities, NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development. 6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. 7. Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals that have both diabetes and substance use disorder (SUD) are more likely to have adverse health outcomes and are less likely to receive high quality diabetes care, compared with patients without coexisting SUD. Care management programs for patients with chronic diseases, such as diabetes and SUD, have been associated with improvements in the process and outcomes of care. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the impact of having coexisting SUD on diabetes process of care metrics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Preintervention/postintervention triple difference analysis. SUBJECTS: Participants in the New York State Medicaid Health Home (NYS-HH) care management program who have diabetes and a propensity-matched comparison group of nonparticipants (N=37,260). MEASURES: Process of care metrics for patients with diabetes: an eye (retinal) exam, HbA1c test, medical attention (screening laboratory measurements) for nephropathy, and receiving all 3 in the past year. RESULTS: Before enrollment in NYS-HH, individuals with comorbid SUD had fewer claims for eye exams and HbA1c tests compared with those without comorbid SUD. Diabetes process of care improvements associated with NYS-HH enrollment were larger among those with comorbid SUD [eye exam: adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.15]; HbA1c test: AOR=1.20 (95% CI: 1.11-1.29); medical attention for nephropathy: AOR=1.21 (95% CI: 1.12-1.31); all 3: AOR=1.09 (95% CI: 1.02-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with both diabetes and SUD may benefit moderately more from care management than those without comorbid SUD. Individuals with both SUD and diabetes who are not enrolled in care management may be missing out on crucial diabetes care.
BACKGROUND: Individuals that have both diabetes and substance use disorder (SUD) are more likely to have adverse health outcomes and are less likely to receive high quality diabetes care, compared with patients without coexisting SUD. Care management programs for patients with chronic diseases, such as diabetes and SUD, have been associated with improvements in the process and outcomes of care. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the impact of having coexisting SUD on diabetes process of care metrics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Preintervention/postintervention triple difference analysis. SUBJECTS: Participants in the New York State Medicaid Health Home (NYS-HH) care management program who have diabetes and a propensity-matched comparison group of nonparticipants (N=37,260). MEASURES: Process of care metrics for patients with diabetes: an eye (retinal) exam, HbA1c test, medical attention (screening laboratory measurements) for nephropathy, and receiving all 3 in the past year. RESULTS: Before enrollment in NYS-HH, individuals with comorbid SUD had fewer claims for eye exams and HbA1c tests compared with those without comorbid SUD. Diabetes process of care improvements associated with NYS-HH enrollment were larger among those with comorbid SUD [eye exam: adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.15]; HbA1c test: AOR=1.20 (95% CI: 1.11-1.29); medical attention for nephropathy: AOR=1.21 (95% CI: 1.12-1.31); all 3: AOR=1.09 (95% CI: 1.02-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with both diabetes and SUD may benefit moderately more from care management than those without comorbid SUD. Individuals with both SUD and diabetes who are not enrolled in care management may be missing out on crucial diabetes care.
Authors: Ana M Abrantes; Cynthia L Battle; David R Strong; Eileen Ing; Mary Ella Dubreuil; Alan Gordon; Richard A Brown Journal: Ment Health Phys Act Date: 2011-12
Authors: Jan Gryczynski; Robert P Schwartz; Kevin E O'Grady; Lauren Restivo; Shannon G Mitchell; Jerome H Jaffe Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Li-Tzy Wu; Udi E Ghitza; He Zhu; Susan Spratt; Marvin Swartz; Paolo Mannelli Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Karen R Siegel; Edward W Gregg; Obidiugwu Kenrik Duru; Lizheng Shi; Carol M Mangione; Pamela L Thornton; Steve Clauser; Mohammed K Ali Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2021-12