Literature DB >> 34148626

Health Insurance Disruptions and Care Access and Affordability in the U.S.

K Robin Yabroff1, Jingxuan Zhao2, Michael T Halpern3, Stacey A Fedewa2, Xuesong Han2, Leticia M Nogueira2, Zhiyuan Zheng2, Ahmedin Jemal2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health insurance is associated with better care in the U.S., but little is known about the associations of coverage disruptions (i.e., periods without insurance) with care access, receipt, and affordability.
METHODS: Adults aged 18-64 years with current private (n=124,746), public (n=30,932), or no (n=31,802) insurance coverage were identified from the 2011-2018 National Health Interview Survey. Data were analyzed in 2020. Separate multivariable logistic regressions evaluated the associations of having coverage disruptions or being uninsured with care access, receipt, and affordability.
RESULTS: Overall, 5.0% of currently insured adults with private and 10.7% with public insurance reported a coverage disruption in the previous year, representing nearly 9.1 million adults in 2018. Among currently uninsured, 24.9% reported coverage loss within the previous year, representing nearly 8.1 million adults in 2018. Among adults with current private or current public coverage, disruptions were associated with lower receipt of all preventive services (AOR=0.42, 95% CI=0.37, 0.46 and AOR=0.48, 95% CI=0.40, 0.58, respectively), with forgoing any needed care because of cost (AOR=4.79, 95% CI=4.44, 5.17 and AOR=4.28, 95% CI=3.86, 4.75), and with medication nonadherence because of cost (AOR=3.55, 95% CI=3.13, 4.03 and AOR=4.09, 95% CI=3.43, 4.88) compared with that among adults with continuous coverage (p<0.05). Longer disruptions among currently insured adults were significantly associated with worse care access, receipt, and affordability, with dose-response patterns. Currently uninsured adults, especially those with longer uninsured periods, reported significantly worse care access, receipt, and affordability than currently insured adults with coverage disruptions or continuous coverage.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the importance of continuous insurance coverage; disruptions owing to the COVID-19 pandemic will likely have adverse consequences for care access and affordability.
Copyright © 2021 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34148626     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  3 in total

1.  Opioid Dose Trajectories and Associations With Mortality, Opioid Use Disorder, Continued Opioid Therapy, and Health Plan Disenrollment.

Authors:  Ingrid A Binswanger; Susan M Shetterly; Stanley Xu; Komal J Narwaney; David L McClure; Deborah J Rinehart; Anh P Nguyen; Jason M Glanz
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03

2.  Mortality Among Patients Prescribed Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder After Disenrollment from an Insurance Plan and Healthcare System.

Authors:  Anh P Nguyen; Jason M Glanz; Jo Ann Shoup; Cynthia I Campbell; Christina L Clarke; Morgan A Ford; Ingrid A Binswanger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Do Disruptions in Health Insurance Continue to Affect Access to Care Even After Coverage Is Regained?

Authors:  James B Kirby; Leticia Nogueira; Jingxuan Zhao; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.473

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.