Literature DB >> 34147707

Static histomorphometry allows for a diagnosis of bone turnover in renal osteodystrophy in the absence of tetracycline labels.

Hanne Skou Jørgensen1, Geert Behets2, Liesbeth Viaene3, Bert Bammens4, Kathleen Claes4, Bjorn Meijers4, Maarten Naesens4, Ben Sprangers4, Dirk Kuypers4, Patrick C D'Haese2, Pieter Evenepoel5.   

Abstract

A bone biopsy with prior tetracycline labeling is the gold standard to diagnose renal osteodystrophy. In cases of missing tetracycline labels, it is still paramount to gain clinically relevant information from the extracted bone sample, by evaluating the static histomorphometry. This study investigates the diagnostic performance of static histomorphometry for the evaluation of high and low bone turnover. Transiliac bone biopsies taken pre- or post- kidney transplantation, of sufficient quality for a full histomorphometric analysis were included (n = 205). The cohort was randomly split to provide separate exploration and validation subsets. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC). All histomorphometric parameters were significantly different across categories of low (24%), normal (60%), and high (16%) bone turnover, and all were significant predictors of both high and low bone turnover (AUC 0.71-0.84). Diagnostic performance was very good for high turnover, as a combination of static parameters resulted in negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of 80% and 96%, respectively. For low turnover, the combined model resulted in PPV of 71% and NPV of 82%. We conclude that in the absence of tetracycline labels, static histomorphometry provide an acceptable alternative for a diagnosis of bone turnover in renal osteodystrophy.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone histomorphometry; Chronic kidney disease; Chronic kidney disease – mineral and bone disorder; Kidney transplantation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34147707     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  3 in total

Review 1.  Time for Revival of Bone Biopsy with Histomorphometric Analysis in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Moving from Skepticism to Pragmatism.

Authors:  Maria Fusaro; Giulia Vanessa Re Sartò; Maurizio Gallieni; Laura Cosmai; Piergiorgio Messa; Maurizio Rossini; Iacopo Chiodini; Mario Plebani; Pieter Evenepoel; Nicholas Harvey; Serge Ferrari; Jorge Cannata-Andía; Andrea Trombetti; Maria Luisa Brandi; Markus Ketteler; Thomas L Nickolas; John Cunningham; Syazrah Salam; Carlo Della Rocca; Aldo Scarpa; Salvatore Minisola; Fabio Malberti; Filomena Cetani; Mario Cozzolino; Sandro Mazzaferro; Luigi Morrone; Giovanni Tripepi; Martina Zaninotto; Maria Cristina Mereu; Maura Ravera; Giuseppe Cianciolo; Gaetano La Manna; Andrea Aghi; Sandro Giannini; Luca Dalle Carbonare
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Natural History of Bone Disease following Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Hanne Skou Jørgensen; Geert Behets; Bert Bammens; Kathleen Claes; Bjorn Meijers; Maarten Naesens; Ben Sprangers; Dirk R J Kuypers; Etienne Cavalier; Patrick D'Haese; Pieter Evenepoel
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Contemporary kidney transplantation has a limited impact on bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Catarina Meng; Hanne Skou Jørgensen; Lieve Verlinden; Nathalie Bravenboer; Henriette de Loor; Patrick C D'Haese; Geert Carmeliet; Pieter Evenepoel
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-02-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.